Elon has previously said that the AP cameras do not provide the resolution necessary to provide dashcam-like capability (I believe he answered this in response to AP1 hardware before AP had been released but can't remember). In general, with video analytics (which is what AP software does with the cameras) what is best for them to do processing (contrast) is not necessarily what gives the best imagery for humans. Even looking at the videos Tesla has published of AP FSD tests to date (where they show what the cameras are seeing) shows the graininess typical of cameras optimized for video analytics.
My experience is that people who install dashcams (note I have not done so) do it for one of two reasons:
(1) they want videos they can show their friends/upload to Youtube/Vimeo/etc.
(2) they want the system to detect accidents and provide enough detail to determine culpability/serve as evidence in a potential legal case or a damages claim.
I don't think the present cameras meet that need compared to the HD-quality cameras that exist on the market for aftermarket installs. Even if the camera is good enough, doing what you require means taking a tap off the camera or cameras video signals and feeding it to some new hardware that does the required recording which adds additional cost to the vehicle. Every time you split a video signal, you lose some power and create a potential source of noise in the system. I'm not sure Tesla is interested in (or would be permitted to do that) in a certified vehicle control system. Keeping control systems "closed" so that they deliver reliable, consistent results is a first principal of system design for mission critical control systems (which arguably the AP system is). Of course, others may feel differently.