whitex
Well-Known Member
"They" was referring to dealership. While they (the dealer) will work with you and the manufacturer, they (dealer) will side with you if the problem cannot be repaired. I had an experience with a Lexus dealer over a bluetooth noise issue. On the third repair attempt, they (the dealership repair shop) worked hard with the manufacturer (Toyota) engineers and they (the dealer) finally fixed the issue. They (the dealer) also told me that it was going to be their (the dealer's) last attempt, and if it had failed, they (the dealer) would assist me with the lemon law claim.I don’t know who ‘they’ is, but in my experience it’s not the manufacturer in the dealer model. In my one experience filing (and winning) a lemon law case, the manufacturer did everything they could to dissuade me from pursuing that path. Right up to the end, within minutes before entering the arbitration room, the manufacturer’s (Mazda) rep said, “You seem like a nice couple, but you won’t win this case”. Instead they tried offering an insulting cash settlement. That simply made my wife and I more determined to win, which we did. Supportive? Hardly.
So I see no difference in filing a lemon law claim with either the Tesla model or the dealer model. Neither model results in a manufacturer who is eager to help you down the lemon law path.
The math is simple, dealer make money on warranty repairs, manufacturers lose money. If manufacturer refuses to fix issues, the dealers are on customer side as they don't save any money by not fixing things, they actually lose money (directly by not being able to perform the repairs and indirectly by losing future customers).
Last edited: