You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So what do those of you who own an EV think about the maintenance costs they've calculated for for the Model 3? $400 for the first 4 years and 800 for the 5th. Is that realistic? Tesla's own Maintenance plan for the RWD Model S costs $2325 for 4 years and should include everything. Can't imagine why the Model 3 would cost double that in the first 5 years.For prospective Model 3 customers who are already accustomed to paying for a BMW 3-Series or equivalent vehicle, the elimination of the tax credit will likely make no difference. The upfront cost between the cars is similar and the Tesla has lower projected TCO.
For prospective Model 3 customers who are stretching their budget from a Honda Civic or Toyota Camry, there will be financial effects from losing the tax credit.
See this analysis:
Obviously you're in on the deception. Can't fool us!FYI: Another TMC member checked the cars being readied for delivery: 1910 is a legitimate number for all those that were sure it was a fake photo.
What would you have to spend money on with the vehicle under warranty?$400 for the first 4 years and 800 for the 5th. Is that realistic?
This is a much better representation of what's going on. I understand the#vin would have some correlation with total built/delivered. But having it on the y axis is very misleading itself. You can have a single 1910 spotted without any other cars. In this case there is an almost doubling effect on the y axis and make it look impressive but in truth it would be dismall if there were only one 1910 built
Are we talking about a net loss in reservations? or net loss in sales? Incentives on Tesla cars would only last in 2018 anyway, and Tesla has more than enough reservations to fill in 2018. And IMO after 2018 there will be enough orders continuously coming in, so there will be no impact on Tesla sales. This is basically doing what Elon wanted in anti-selling the M3 for the entire 2017 which is to reduce the backlog for 2018.
Not necessarily. It's just that $7500 less or more will shift the overall balance.
No, they didn't do some research. The majority of reservations came in at a time many of the crucial details were completely unknown. And since the $1000 was fully refundable, there was no need to either. For most reservations holders, the real research will start once they are invited to configure and asked to pony up another $2500 but now non-refundable.
After the credit hits 200,000 it runs the next quarter and then 50% for the next 6 months.Given that the tax credit was going to run out 1-2Q 2018, the biggest impact is on the people who reserved M3 on day 1(& maybe 1st week). Day 1 had like 400K reservations of which like 125K -150K were US. The assumption was that not all of the 125K reservation holders would end up getting the tax credit anyway.
So while there might be an impact, there is one more thing that we can assume about the day one reservation holders - most likely to be Tesla fanboys, EV enthusiasts etc etc. So with this skewed biased population in data sample, chances of changes in rule having big impact should be reduced.
You are correct if the ramp was smooth and few people are watching it closely. % of reported vin over total production will decrease as production rate increase because the Model 3 will be less "special". But I don't think we're there yet. Hence the 1910 could still be a similar case of that 10xx in late Sep.I disagree with this. It is highly unlikely that they would build cars with high VIN #s like 1910 without being on some kind of ramp to build the other 1909.
IMO, highest VIN is a better indicator than unique VINs because the latter is highly dependent on people posting every single VIN they see.
With unique VINs, you get a lumpy graph that flattens out as public interest in individual sightings decreases. You will never see a true exponential ramp in that graph because people stop posting unimportant VINs.
With highest VIN, you get an absolute state that doesn't depend on quantity of postings. The number is always increasing just as total production is always increasing. You can simply adjust for uncertainty based on # of confirmed VINs which is also visible in that graph, and do something to your liking like divide 1910 by 2 to get an estimate.
Example:
When there are only 100 Model 3s in the wild, people will post every single VIN they see, so we may get 30 unique VINs from that 100.
When there are 10000 Model 3s in the wild, you won't have 3000 people posting unique VINs, but you may have someone who posts a notably high VIN # like 99xx.
We saw 10xx in late Sep?You are correct if the ramp was smooth and few people are watching it closely. % of reported vin over total production will decrease as production rate increase because the Model 3 will be less "special". But I don't think we're there yet. Hence the 1910 could still be a similar case of that 10xx in late Sep.
I was wrong. 521 was the highest known vin before October. Still, my point is the relationship between total production and highest vin number is not linear and I think it still stands.We saw 10xx in late Sep?
Edit: AFAIK the high VIN in Sep were 505 spotted on 9/29, and 521 spotted on 9/30
VIN 1979 delivered.I was wrong. 521 was the highest known vin before October. Still, my point is the relationship between total production and highest vin number is not linear and I think it still stands.