You're calling it a workaround and delegation but having Apple or Google developing this integration seems quite beneficial for a bunch of reasons. The car makers wouldn't even need OTA patches to upgrade the UI functionality because that's all being done by Apple/Google over the internet and through the devices, which would then port through to the screens in the vehicle. CarPlay has already improved quite a bit since I first used it last year without any updates required in the vehicles themselves.I saw that post and my thought was that those 79% are not Tesla owners.
I believe Apple CarPlay is a workaround for oem to provide a decent UI experience in their cars as they don’t focus on that (UI) and prefer to delegate to Apple or Google.
I saw it for myself and read regular complains about CarPlay that I just don’t have with the Tesla interface.
Tesla has focused since day one and is still aiming at a great UI experience.
But it is a work in progress.
Correct me if I’m wrong but you have a new S or X.
Legacy S and C have plenty of customization on the IC (dashboard).
Like I wrote, it’s a work in progress and I hope for you it is ported to your cars sooner than later.
This is a great opportunity for the phone makers to capitalize on the fact that everyone connects their phone to their car and these cars have tons of screens nowadays.
What makes less sense and seems less efficient is OEMs putting a lot of energy into developing their own UIs and then phone manufacturers also doing their own thing for the interface tied to the devices that we all connect to our vehicles. If phone makers can take on more of that, with the added benefit of building it into the UI on the devices themselves and upgradability through cell/internet connections in those devices, I can see all kinds of benefits. And the world benefits from not having multiple companies doing overlapping work, focus can be put elsewhere.
Last edited: