Just as another illustration, I went to the logs for my car and did a comparison of the rate of degradation for the original and 3.0 batteries. What I did was to plot the CAC minus the starting CAC (156.7 for the original battery, 214.6 for the 3.0) vs. the mileage.
In the case of my car, I got a replacement original battery at just under 30K miles, so there are two lines. The replacement battery was grossly unbalanced when it was installed, so it took quite some time to get back to the new battery CAC, so I just ignored that portion of its lifetime and called 0 for it when it hit 156.7. You'll notice that it kept going up for a few thousand miles before it started to go down for real.
Anyway, the point of this is the dramatic difference in slope. It took about 22K miles for the 3.0 battery to have the same amount of loss that my (second) original battery did in 82K, and there's no apparent end in sight.
I'm starting to wonder whether my original Roadster will last long enough for the new Roadster to make it; I didn't pay the 250K to get a Founders' edition, so I probably need at least four more years. Projecting this slope out four more years gives me a CAC of 98Ah, which not in range mode is more-or-less a first edition Leaf.
View attachment 271721
I'm curious why your original battery only lasted 22k miles. It shows a similar slope to the 3.0 battery, if I squint hard enough. What happened to the original?
I have ~46k miles on my original battery, and currently see a CAC of about 139.5. It was about 142.5 when I bought the car 3 years ago, though per the graphs below, perhaps I should peg that a bit higher. Standard charge is down to about 163 miles ideal range now, vs 175. That's about 3 AH of CAC reduction over 18k miles, in 3 years, or a point CAC loss every 2,700 miles since birth. Lifetime, it seems to follow your replacement battery's slope, but more recently the decline seems to have accelerated, more like your original one. That's what has me a bit worried.
Last week, a 95 mile round trip to the airport (with a 1,000 ft elevation gain on the return) left me with about 50 miles ideal left, and that was without the heat or A/C running. Comfortable margin, but I wouldn't want to go a whole lot lower. 25 miles ideal is where my range anxiety starts kicking in. (I also get anxious when my cell phone gets down to about 20% too.) Family is some 150 to 220 miles away, so I was thinking about springing for the new battery later this year, but these graphs keep telling me not to do it. Like
@dpeilow, I intend to keep the car "forever", vs springing for the new Roadster. There's something about owning and driving the car that started it all that has me hooked...
Last year, during the annual spring de-leafing ritual, I asked the service folks about the 3.0 battery longevity. They, of course, had heard nothing of the issue. I forwarded them a link to this thread, but never heard anything back. Will follow up again in a few months. Perhaps re-forwarding them the link at the time I make my appointment will at least give them notice that I (we) need an answer. Is the observed decline real, or just an accumulated estimation error that will sort itself out over time? That's not a gamble I want to risk $29k on, given that my original battery isn't in that bad a shape. Yet.
For the curious (myself included), here is my original battery's CAC history. I'm guessing the initial ramp was also partly due to the car not being driven or charged regularly in the several months prior to my purchase at the end of 2014, so things were a probably bit out of balance. But the decline is very noticeable after that. Also note that I retired mid-2016 (40.5 k miles at the time), so the miles driven dropped off significantly after that, from about 250/week to maybe 10/week now, with infrequent distance visits to family.
@bolosky, if this data would be of any use, I can send you the spreadsheet.