No. They both show a decrease. The exact same decrease. Look at the annual data line, not the smoothing line.Sorry to insult your religion. I'm not. My point was that in 2017 on chart A you see a drop. In 2017 on chart B you see an increase.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. They both show a decrease. The exact same decrease. Look at the annual data line, not the smoothing line.Sorry to insult your religion. I'm not. My point was that in 2017 on chart A you see a drop. In 2017 on chart B you see an increase.
No. They both show a decrease. The exact same decrease. Look at the annual data line, not the smoothing line.
OK, so we should be celebrating! We're turning the problem around!! (A point I originally made!)
Yeah absolutely, exactly like celebrating today's gains or losses in the market and claiming it represents a trend. Very well thought out.
What's to think out? We're talking about slivers of degrees. My day continues as if nothing is going to happen, because, well, nothing is going to happen... but hey, if you're that passionate about it, I'm not knocking you. I appreciate and respect peoples' passion and dedication towards their beliefs, whether it be in God, the Sun, climate change, or whatever. I just don't buy into it further than it is actually happening (which I don't deny).
Actually I am an engineer and for me it is simply reviewing and understanding the data available, and a basis in critical thinking that gives credence to expert opinion, no belief system needed. Lack of understanding of the science and a belief that it "won't affect me today" is understandable I suppose, there are many many people globally that replace knowledge and understanding with personal beliefs and don't buy in to many things. Many, many people are reaching the "magic threshold" on many topics where they have no understanding of how things work, so for them it is "magic". It is in thee cases where belief systems start to replace understanding. I am sorry to say I don't respect this and I do not agree that a non-expert opinion or belief on any topic is equivalent to an expert opinion based on critical data analytics.
You can look out your window and think this is the equivalent of scientific analysis for creating a view on the global climate, I have no issue with that. I do have an issue with treating this as some type of equivalent view that should be given the same weight in public discourse.
If you're an engineer, than you certainly fully understand that data can be manipulated to enhance an outcome. It's only as black and white as you choose it to be. Certainly there is no argument of an acceleration of global warming over the last 50 years. The argument (and thus, belief) is whether or not it is man-made, and if so, what percentage of the acceleration is due to man. Yes, I said it, percentage. 100%? 10%? 1%? There is absolutely zero scientific evidence that explains why. And that, my friend, is where the entire religion comes in to play.
How about summer setting 95° and winter 69°? 55° is pretty fricken cold unless you're the Iceman.WHAT YOU CAN DO
summer setting 78
winter setting 55
under desk heater? lap blanket?
incandescent lamp (30w to start) desk lamp for heat + light.
JUST DO IT - save a few dollars
Yes this is exactly my point, that you have a "belief" but are not a climate scientist. I am very sure if I checked your view 1-2 years ago it would be that climate change in it's entirety was a hoax. As many of the "science disbelievers" you now have come to grips with the fact that the climate is actually changing, but still don't want to "believe" that there is a causality associated with the now admitted change. Again for me it is not a "belief" it is critical analysis of the available information. At this stage, it is growing tiresome providing facts and data in these types of discussions, much like a debate about the earth being flat or gravity being non existent and caused by the acceleration of the flat plane in an upward direction. I would urge anyone who cannot understand the science and therefore replaces the conclusions of the best scientists in the world with their "beliefs" to consider if that alone makes sense.
Have a great day, going to leave the last word for you
OMG we go to the same church.
This should really just be posted every so often. The fact is that there is no way to convince people when their head is buried in the...uhh...we'll just say sand.
What exactly is your point?You so eloquently prove my point. Thanks, man! Have a great day! <Last word!>
goals - your environment matters - when are you actually at home on your feet? which room?How about summer setting 95° and winter 69°? 55° is pretty fricken cold unless you're the Iceman.
What exactly is your point?
Glacial period - WikipediaWell, I thought the whole story was tongue in cheek, sort of to make everyone feel good for the holidays.
What do I know?
Like most religions, take it with a grain of salt. Just for starters, all scientists do NOT agree that climate change has been going on for millions of years. There is no factual evidence of that, although many scientists bend the evidence to their own beliefs. And there are many scientists that disagree.