Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Australia Expansion

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Tesla does not have infinite resources. Biggest investment goes to biggest potential.

Texas, with a population over 26.5M, only has five SpC 2.5 years after the first Texans bought a Model S.

Australia will get Supercharger build out much faster than Texas.

Australia is potentially a big growth market. From zero to potentially thousand(s) in a year or 2, if main route Superchargers are in place. You're right about us getting a much faster rollout than Texas regardless, 16 planned within 2 years. Seems to be the same chicken/egg scenario here as there though.

- - - Updated - - -

Interesting reading, even though it was written in 2013 with only the US market in mind, many of the assumptions would remain much the same for Australia and the rest of the world, for Tesla to become the dominant global player in fast charging. Also interesting are the cost estimates for each Supercharger station and the breakdown of those costs.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/1300141-supercharging-tesla


..

The rapid-recharging business offers at least as great an opportunity for Tesla as the electric car business. While Tesla's advanced electric car technology and IP gives them competitive advantage in the car business, Tesla would need to raise vast amounts of capital and displace powerful, established incumbents before reaping the benefits of industry dominance building cars. By building only enough cars to demonstrate the superiority and lower costs of their technology, licensing partners, then taking on the rapid-recharging business, Tesla can grow dramatically without having to compete against existing car companies and without needing to raise outsized amounts of new capital.


Pursuing the SuperCharger business, leveraged by their electric car expertise, IP, large car maker partners, and innovative 'free' pricing, positions Tesla to dominate the rapid-recharging business and profit from disruption as electric motors and batteries replace ICEs and gas tanks. While their partners and licensees drive disruption of the car business, Tesla can make a bundle for their shareholders by dominating the rapid-recharging business that enables electric car road trips.
..
The capital cost for one 'nominal' SuperCharger station is estimated at just under $1.2 million.

Supercharger station costs.jpg


For Australia, assume these costs are considerably higher without the availability of State and Federal government incentives and credits, around 35% higher plus inflation and currency conversion. That's approaching $2 million per station with 6 chargers and 12 slots. Some Australian routes, at least initially, could be serviced by stations with 3 chargers and 6 slots, reducing startup costs significantly. With plans for around 16 Superchargers to link the east coast cities by the end of 2016, cost would not seem to be the limiting factor.

Australia 2016.jpg


…A 6 charger station can service more than twice the cars a 3 station charger can before drivers have to wait to plug in. Adding a large battery to the SuperCharger station will allow us to level out demand and operate 6 chargers while only drawing power from 3 chargers from the utility and getting the rest of the needed power from the battery. The battery can then be recharged from the grid when fewer than 3 cars are being charged. The problem of course is that this battery is expensive. Conveniently, the battery can be used to store power when rates are low and return it to the grid when rates are high (rate arbitrage), to store energy at low rate periods for use charging cars at other times, or to supply ‘stabilization services’ to the grid. Any and all of these things help to economically justify the battery.

If this study is accurate, the costs aren't trivial but are still insignificant when you contemplate the vision of building the global electric intercity network on all 6 continents and the potential for large income streams into the future. With more manufacturers joining the partnership, there's plentiful upside from increasing volumes. With the introduction of battery storage into Superchargers, the equation becomes even more favourable. Since Tesla have announced they’re looking to power the network in Australia with solar energy, batteries make even more sense here.

Fundamental is the idea that, in an otherwise slow take-up market, fast implementation of charging infrastructure will drive uptake of EV’s in general and Tesla & partner manufacturers in particular. In the absence of government support that exists in every other market, in the short term here in Australia, it’s up to Tesla to be the catalyst for change until governments catch up.
 
Except that I don't think they are using batteries in SCs for the foreseeable future. They are not using solar canopies for chargers because it is cheaper for Tesla to buy green energy and roll out more SCs quicker and cheaper than putting solar canopies over only some. I figure they will roll out solar harvesting at the suitable superchargers down the line once the network is established.

So roughly 50% of the cost has been eliminated for now and will be seen as an upgrade for certain locations in the future.
 
Tesla does not have infinite resources. Biggest investment goes to biggest potential.

Texas, with a population over 26.5M, only has five SpC 2.5 years after the first Texans bought a Model S.

Australia will get Supercharger build out much faster than Texas.
Why bring Texas into it? Texas is coming up on 3000 Model S deliveries and we still can't leave the state, so it doesn't appear that the lack of a Supercharger buildout has made an impact. I wonder if Oz will have 3K deliveries two years from now.
 
Except that I don't think they are using batteries in SCs for the foreseeable future. They are not using solar canopies for chargers because it is cheaper for Tesla to buy green energy and roll out more SCs quicker and cheaper than putting solar canopies over only some. I figure they will roll out solar harvesting at the suitable superchargers down the line once the network is established.

So roughly 50% of the cost has been eliminated for now and will be seen as an upgrade for certain locations in the future.
Tesla IS deploying batteries at Supercharger sites. Hawthorne, Tejon Ranch, Barstow and Gilroy already have active battery systems. There are pictures here on TMC. Solar canopies are less prevalent, but Hawthorne and Tejon have them and there are large "mystery footings" that were installed at Barstow when the site was recently re-built. Those large footings are likely for supporting a solar canopy.