Note that the UN regulation is not a “law”.
May be because you have not looked at Honda Legend related posts ? Search and you will understand.
The funny thing is liability actually does give me confidence in L3-L5 systems. It's L2 systems, where the liable party has a poor understanding about the capabilities and limitations of the system, that need more oversight.
Yes, It is regulation my mistake for calling it a law.
I didn't change the subject. You were the one who brought libertarian views into the discussion.
Perhaps bring this information into this thread titled "Autonomous Car Progress", we love to discuss these things in this thread.
You did not think this one through, did you? Is this not you asking me to explain something to you that you claim can be easily found?
You made an incredible claim such as the one above but you won't provide any information to back up that claim. If you have read or come across said information that you claim is out there, would it not be nice to share it with fellow enthusiasts on this board? And here I thought the purpose of this thread was to share information pertaining to the progress of ADS.
Would you look at this @EVNow . @diplomat33 shared information and he wasn't even asked to. He did it by himself because he figured it was pertinent to the discussion. Lol
www.vice.com
That’s an angle I knew was possible hadn’t thought about. The Police have been experimenting with using Boston Dynamic’s autonomous robot Spot to do surveillance.Slightly off-topic:
San Francisco Police Are Using Driverless Cars as Mobile Surveillance Cameras
“Autonomous vehicles are recording their surroundings continuously and have the potential to help with investigative leads,” an internal training document states.
Some malls are using security robots like Parents upset after Palo Alto security robot injures child. I've seen these around and some of my FB friends have posted videos of them. There was a happy ending to the above: Boy hurt by Stanford mall robot tours robot company.
www.oregonlive.com
Is that legal ?Slightly off-topic:
San Francisco Police Are Using Driverless Cars as Mobile Surveillance Cameras
“Autonomous vehicles are recording their surroundings continuously and have the potential to help with investigative leads,” an internal training document states.
Get off your lazy couch and do some searching and stop begging me to do your work.
As it was explained to me: if you are outside on a public street or sidewalk you “have no reasonable expectation of privacy “. That is why dashcams are OK.
Yep, I've seen posts years ago on Nextdoor about Starship delivering in a neighborhood sorta near me but that stopped (long story). Some people were commenting on how they had trouble w/sidewalks and others said one almost became a new hood ornament. Seems like I posted about this in 2019: Self-driving delivery robots causing traffic troubles.These little guys have been delivering food at my daughter university for about 2 years. They stick to the sidewalk, move a bit faster than walking and has a limited service range but she says it’s cute to watch them maneuver around people. How they kept folks fed when the cafeterias were closed. Sad however when one got stuck in the tracks and was taken out by a train.
Robots are delivering food to Oregon State students; university heralds it as ideal for coronavirus pandemic
Kerry Paterson, who heads up Oregon State’s residential-dining services, says the “contactless” delivery system is a particularly valuable option for this pandemic year.
