stopcrazypp
Well-Known Member
They are probably talking about the mud visible on the control arm here:Well, the only two pics showing damage are 5 and 7:
View attachment 734894
View attachment 734893
Looks to me like this 2nd pic is the front edge of the battery.
The two scratches do seem to line up, but I'm not at all sure why they would indicate off-roading? If the first contact at the leading edge were a rock, why wouldn't it leave a scratch all the way down, as opposed to half-way down the battery pack?
The front aero shield is also grimy, although it could be road grime.
I'm not sure why it matters if it's off road or not though, as the warranty doesn't cover collision damage anyways (that damage is clearly from driving over something). For example if you have a tear hole on the front aero shield, Tesla doesn't cover that either. There is a provision to cover the battery in case of a fire, even if the owner was at fault (other than purposeful damage to it), but the battery here didn't catch on fire, so that part doesn't apply here.
The back damage looks fairly cosmetic to me, the second picture showing the front damage looks more serious as there seems to be a crack, which would need to be sealed. Ideally the pack is disassembled to see if there is any internal damage. Actually the bottom plate looks fairly thick to me, clearly not just thin sheet metal. Whatever item the car hit, lobbed off a decent sized piece. Others have also scrapped the bottom and the damage looks largely cosmetic. The weak part actually isn't the pack plate thickness, it's the front coolant couplings, combined with a regular fabric-like front aero shield. The pack itself can be totally fine but if you damage those coolant couplings the official repair is to replace the whole pack (that's also where the whole $700 controversy came).
Scraped the bottom of my model 3 last night :(
Last edited: