You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here’s a recap from one of my posts in another thread. AWD with 9K, was charging a couple times a week to SOC 80% (rarely varied unless for road trip). Noticed a decline over summer from 310 down to 298. Switched to charging to 60% and after a couple times was back to 308 and as of last night it displays 310 rated range (using Stats).
Hey @Sherlo, can you tell us what your estimated miles at 100% are currently and also what version of the software you're running? I didn't think to ask that. I'm on 2019.36.2.1 and don't seem to be having any luck.
Happy Thanksgiving—
36.2.1 and rated miles at 100% has been ranging between 304-308. I played around with stepping up charge level in 5% increments (50-55-60-65) and think the variance comes from when the charge is shutoff (software issue).
So far no change for me. I switched to 70% for the past week. I just hit 90% this morning and there’s no change in miles. :-/
It's hard to say without CANBUS and other analytic data sets. But: Driving the MFD; keeping the HV circuits energized; and cooling the battery all leap to mind. Mostly the latter.Where is all that current/energy going in those last minutes?
It's hard to say without CANBUS and other analytic data sets. But: Driving the MFD; keeping the HV circuits energized; and cooling the battery all leap to mind. Mostly the latter.
For what it's worth, the changes I'm seeing in my projected range look like simple noise, though I only have a couple kilomiles' worth of data so far.
Interesting! If you've read the whole thread, I showed that @Allistah's data appears to correlate with temp change, as well as mine and @hcdavis3 's data.Very very very very curious... I always thought the estimated 100% range was a constant multiplied by actual pack capacity in kwh (does not adjust for temperature / driving conditions, etc...). I believe this to be the case for older SW versions. However, like others, I've been seeing rapid degradation lately.
View attachment 482594
So I exported the data from TeslaFi and changed the X-axis from odometer reading to Date, and plotted estimated 100% range vs OAT (deg F):
View attachment 482595
If someone told me that in a software update they started taking OAT and/or battery temperature into consideration when calculating range, then I think this would be very believable. Seems like Tesla could eliminate alot of angst by just announcing their intentions.
It's available for anyone to set up and host for themselves; it's an open-source program called Teslamate, and the devs are adding new charts and dashboards rather regularly.Hey that's cool! How are you seeing this data? Is this something that is only available outside the US? What other kind of data can you see? Can you share more about what you're using to get this chart?
What does this mean...?I'd suggest everybody to relax. Tesla bumped BMS energy buffer from 2 to 3.4 kWh in 19.32.x. which translates to around 6 miles or usable range loss.
Well, that would explain exactly what's happening. Where do you see this change?I'd suggest everybody to relax. Tesla bumped BMS energy buffer from 2 to 3.4 kWh in 19.32.x. which translates to around 6 miles or usable range loss.
I'll plot mine this way tomorrow as well.... but I live in SoCal, and mine started dropping when outside temps were in the 90's