You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, I just laid down the simple truth about your approach to "debate" .. and your response was (a) exactly as expected and (b) underlined the point of my post. And I'm certainly not the rabid monkey in this debate.Spare me your sanctimonious lectures. When this was directed to me, I'm sure you jumped up and down with jubilant glee.
"If there is a rabid monkey throwing poo in the kitchen it's not a bad idea to stay out."
Well, you just undermined your entire argument against me with your endorsement of the rabid monkey. This is why I don't behave so high and mighty. I am amongst a bunch of bottom feeders here.No, I just laid down the simple truth about your approach to "debate" .. and your response was (a) exactly as expected and (b) underlined the point of my post. And I'm certainly not the rabid monkey in this debate.
You could have actually laid out your concerns about the majority opinions on global warming .. I'd have respected that, regardless if I agreed or not. But all these sad insults? Really, is that how your mind works? Shout and scream like a child?
You obviously don’t understand the point Spencer was making nor what the 97% of climate scientists are saying.As Dr. Spencer already told us, the amount is so tiny our instruments can't even measure it.
Which is based on more than 20,000 papers and results are public. So please show us his errors.That stupid ass 97% figure came from this guy, John Cook. Complete delusional nonsense!
![]()
The Truth about Skeptical Science
Source: Skeptical Science Forums Skeptical Science is a climate alarmist website created by a self-employed cartoonist , John Cook (who ...www.populartechnology.net
Yes IF we warm some 4 degrees which is likely if we do not change our way then yes we will melt the ice sheets with the accompanying sea level rise.Are you trying to make the point that the human species will cause the sea level to rise 200 feet?
Yes IF we warm some 4 degrees which is likely if we do not change our way then yes we will melt the ice sheets with the accompanying sea level rise.
Yep, and instead of playing it safe by advancing renewables and increasing implementation, he figures it is better not to change his comfort/life style and let the kids worry about the future. Typical A******* boomer. Again, the smart money would be to increase interconnection and help the country be truly energy independent. Imagine a gas or coal plant that does not need to be fed - because nature feeds it! I guess Mitch would rather there be no rain and no pipe system and instead people have to bring buckets to the river or village well to collect water... very Mad Max / 3rd world that only 1 party is trying to lead us to.
You must think Waterworld was a realistic movie.Yes IF we warm some 4 degrees which is likely if we do not change our way then yes we will melt the ice sheets with the accompanying sea level rise.
There are plenty!Which is based on more than 20,000 papers and results are public. So please show us his errors.
lol Wattsupwiththat.There are plenty!
![]()
97 Articles Refuting The '97% Consensus' on global warming
The 97% “consensus” study, Cook et al. (2013) has been thoroughly refuted in scholarly peer-reviewed journals, by major news media, public policy organizations and think tanks, highly c…wattsupwiththat.com
lol Wattsupwiththat.
Which is based on more than 20,000 papers and results are public. So please show us his errors.
Do the math. As it is the future if we do not change.You must think Waterworld was a realistic movie.
97 out of over 20,000 is quite a small number. More people than that believe the world is flat or that Trump won the election. And I looked at the list and I have yet to find one written by a climate scientist.There are plenty!
![]()
97 Articles Refuting The '97% Consensus' on global warming
The 97% “consensus” study, Cook et al. (2013) has been thoroughly refuted in scholarly peer-reviewed journals, by major news media, public policy organizations and think tanks, highly c…wattsupwiththat.com
What about the one written by FoxNews? Haha.97 out of over 20,000 is quite a small number. More people than that believe the world is flat or that Trump won the election. And I looked at the list and I have yet to find one written by a climate scientist.
You didn't even look at it. Those are 97 separate articles investigating the bogus 97% claim.97 out of over 20,000 is quite a small number. More people than that believe the world is flat or that Trump won the election. And I looked at the list and I have yet to find one written by a climate scientist.
There is much more than Fox News.What about the one written by FoxNews? Haha.