My household has owned the LEAF, Prime PHEV, and Tesla Model 3. I admit that I don't spend as much attention to fuel economy as I used to but yesterday's drive up a mountain in our Model 3 was so impressive that I started comparing to our other EVs
LEAF: used only in town/suburbia driving. In temperate weather ~ 175 Wh/mile. Best results are ~ 140 Wh/mile
Prime: Amazing fuel economy in small town driving. My best results were 100 Wh/mile round trip in ideal driving but 130 - 140 Wh/mile were routine.
Model 3: In temperate weather in suburbia ~ 180 Wh/mile. We live in the foothills of a mountain that hits 10,400 feet at its peak. Yesterday we drove to the top for hiking. The round trip is 78 miles, and net elevation climb is ~ 4,000 feet. The drive up consumed 376 Wh/mile and the drive home -22 Wh/mile for a net consumption of 177 Wh/mile. That is pretty remarkable -- consumption up and down a mountain about the same as suburbia driving. It demonstrates that while the Model 3 gives up some daily driving energy economy due mostly to weight from the large battery, it can shine when exemplary regen is the name of the game.
-----
Tangent:
I used to argue with a Prime owning Engineer who thought that EVs could never reach the performance of long range ICE or hydrogen cars due to the weight penalty. He is wrong for a couple of reasons but second * among them is that his rule of thumb does not apply in an EV world where a good drivetrain and a large battery have outstanding regen.
* First reason of course is that long distance driving is highway driving where the weight penalty reduces to rolling resistance, m*g*f
LEAF: used only in town/suburbia driving. In temperate weather ~ 175 Wh/mile. Best results are ~ 140 Wh/mile
Prime: Amazing fuel economy in small town driving. My best results were 100 Wh/mile round trip in ideal driving but 130 - 140 Wh/mile were routine.
Model 3: In temperate weather in suburbia ~ 180 Wh/mile. We live in the foothills of a mountain that hits 10,400 feet at its peak. Yesterday we drove to the top for hiking. The round trip is 78 miles, and net elevation climb is ~ 4,000 feet. The drive up consumed 376 Wh/mile and the drive home -22 Wh/mile for a net consumption of 177 Wh/mile. That is pretty remarkable -- consumption up and down a mountain about the same as suburbia driving. It demonstrates that while the Model 3 gives up some daily driving energy economy due mostly to weight from the large battery, it can shine when exemplary regen is the name of the game.
-----
Tangent:
I used to argue with a Prime owning Engineer who thought that EVs could never reach the performance of long range ICE or hydrogen cars due to the weight penalty. He is wrong for a couple of reasons but second * among them is that his rule of thumb does not apply in an EV world where a good drivetrain and a large battery have outstanding regen.
* First reason of course is that long distance driving is highway driving where the weight penalty reduces to rolling resistance, m*g*f
Last edited: