LinkedIn - we are coming for you
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ah yes, because you'll want potential employers to see your unhinged social media posts
Also, could start as ads with links in your feed.Is Instagram good for recruitment?
If your business is looking to recruit the next generation of millennials, Instagram is the place to start. Even if millennials are not your target market, Instagram is still a highly effective recruitment platform that attracts all ages.
There's quite the gap between your filtered sunset photos and your unhinged rants against the rightwing/leftwing media, wef, covid vaccines, etc.Also, could start as ads with links in your feed.
"Considering" clearly means something which may or may not happen, there is no requirement for signed documents when thinking about something. There was never any question that Elon could have gotten the funding if he decided to follow through with this "speculation" about taking Tesla private. The jury made the correct decision.Jury Clears Elon Musk of Wrongdoing Related to 2018 Tesla Tweets
A jury on Friday decided Elon Musk didn’t deceive investors with his 2018 tweets about electric automaker Tesla.www.nbcbayarea.com
Jury sucks. What does "funding secured" mean if there's not a deal on paper?
Now a bunch of CEOs need to come out and say that <insert large company here> is "considering" acquiring their company for $X per share. Could pump up the stock price a bit, even if the news is later proven false, and they won't get in trouble because that word apparently means nothing."Considering" clearly means something which may or may not happen, there is no requirement for signed documents when thinking about something. There was never any question that Elon could have gotten the funding if he decided to follow through with this "speculation" about taking Tesla private. The jury made the correct decision.
Eh. I wouldn't take it personally. If you're not getting down votes then you're not taking enough chances.There's quite the gap between your filtered sunset photos and your unhinged rants against the rightwing/leftwing media, wef, covid vaccines, etc.
Edit: I see our resident good natured rascal is still abusing the down vote button
Like I tell my JV basketball playing son - "if you aren't fouling, you aren't trying."If you're not getting down votes then you're not taking enough chances.
Some people are acting like some types of reactions increment your reaction score and some decrement it, but it's my understanding that ALL reactions increment your reaction score.Eh. I wouldn't take it personally. If you're not getting down votes then you're not taking enough chances.
In any case, a negative reaction is not and should not be a reflection on how one feels about another person, rather how they feel about that post.Some people are acting like some types of reactions increment your reaction score and some decrement it, but it's my understanding that ALL reactions increment your reaction score.
Thumbs down, Whah, Sob!
Am I trapped in some hellish Middle School thread?
Interesting false narrative you created. Facts: The share price was rising sharply before Elon tweeted because of reports of Saudi interest. Also since neither Elon nor Tesla sold shares after the "Pump" what would be the point of "pumping the stock"? Timeline:Now a bunch of CEOs need to come out and say that <insert large company here> is "considering" acquiring their company for $X per share. Could pump up the stock price a bit, even if the news is later proven false, and they won't get in trouble because that word apparently means nothing.
People forget (or don't know) the sequence of events on Aug 07, 2018: My comment #65,409
"TSLA jumped from the low 340s to the high 350s in the morning of Aug 8 after the Financial Times broke the story (12:18 pm EST) of the $2B Saudi investment in Tesla."The SP only ran up another $6 after Elon's tweet (12:48 pm EST) before NASDAQ halted trading, but the SP was increasing rapidly anyway. The tweet acted as confirmation of Saudi interest in Tesla."
The Event timeline:
Here is an annotated Google chart of TSLA share price during the time in question:
- Saudi Arabia’s sovereign fund builds $2bn Tesla stake | Financial Times | (2018-08-07 12:18 ET)
- DISQUS: BREAKING: Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund builds $2bn Tesla stake. TSLA SP up $10 in 3 minutes. | Artful Dodger (2018-08-07 12:24 ET)
- Elon Musk on Twitter: "Am considering taking Tesla private at $420. Funding secured." | (2018-08-07 12:48 ET)
View attachment 903216
As anyone can plainly see, more than half of the share price jump happened after the Financial Times broke the story, but BEFORE Elon's tweet. Yes, 30 mins after the FT story, Elon confirmed it's validity, so naturally further TSLA buying interest appeared.
But clearly, it was the FT news of the Saudi PIF buying TSLA stock that initiated the SP jump on Aug 7, 2018, NOT Elon's tweet.
Did anybody see what happend to $LCID stock Jan 27, 2023 on the rumor that the Saudi PIF would buy out the remainder of Lucid's shares? That was a 100% pop going from $9 to $18, and causing the exchange to halt trading 9 separate times. Note that TSLA shares only rose a max ~9% (from $340 to $370) after the Saudi news on Aug 7, 2018.
In some cases, it appears to be the actual "Q" safe space. Lots of that stuff being thrown around cryptically.This is the TSLAQ "safe space."
Yeah, the decision felt technically correct. It was still a bone-headed gratuitous tweet though."Considering" clearly means something which may or may not happen, there is no requirement for signed documents when thinking about something. There was never any question that Elon could have gotten the funding if he decided to follow through with this "speculation" about taking Tesla private. The jury made the correct decision.
I prefer to think of it as where facts fight worship to a draw.You missed the memo? This is the TSLAQ "safe space."
I wasn't suggesting it was a pump and dump. More like plain old financial statement fraud. As for motive, given that he didn't personally sell any shares after making the statement, well, Elon's whined about people shorting TSLA for many years...Interesting false narrative you created. Facts: The share price was rising sharply before Elon tweeted because of reports of Saudi interest. Also since neither Elon nor Tesla sold shares after the "Pump" what would be the point of "pumping the stock"? Timeline:
I wasn't suggesting it was a pump and dump. More like plain old financial statement fraud. As for motive, given that he didn't personally sell any shares after making the statement, well, Elon's whined about people shorting TSLA for many years...