Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

EV6 to a Model Y

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Good afternoon, everyone.

I ended up trading Ruby the EV6 for a Model Y last night. My 5 months with the EV6 was fantastic, and the mechanical bits were every bit as awesome as I hoped going in. Ultimately, it was the lousy CCS charging experience combined with software that seemed like an afterthought that drove me to making the switch. For anyone interested, here are a few thoughts I have between the two.

IMG_8333.jpegIMG_7391.jpegIMG_8163.jpeg

Driving

The driving experience between the two is very different. The aggressive looks of the EV6 belie its fantastic road manners and refinement. I think my EV6 was the quietest and best-riding car I've ever had, and was MUCH better than the Model 3 that I had for two years previously. Everything was tight, there were no unusual noises, and it was a joy on the highway. In comparison, the Y has a choppier ride, a bit more noise, and a strange booming resonance when I go over bumps at higher speed. It's not enough to be intrusive and much better than my '19 Model 3 was, but not to the level of the EV6.

Compared to the athletic EV6, I think the Model Y looks like a bloated fish. But the handling is the polar opposite with the aggressive steering ratio and smaller wheel. Despite its much larger size, the Model Y is 330 lbs lighter, and you can feel it. My AWD EV6 had the slick front axle disconnect that improved high-speed efficiency, but it came at the expense of a noticeable lag as the motor spun up deliver the power that my right foot was requesting. The Y is locked in at all times, and power comes on like a hammer. The standard Y calibration has a throttle tip-in that's somewhere between normal and Sport Mode on the EV6.

For overall performance, they're extremely close. I've seen drag races where the EV6 was right next to the Model Y up to about 60 MPH, and that's about my experience. The RWD EV6 isn't anything special for performance, but my AWD model felt like a rocketship. I think my '19 Standard Range 3 would walk it above 70 MPH though; the power dropoff at higher speeds was more pronounced. Below 60, it wasn't even close. Up until the Model Y, that EV6 was the fastest thing I've owned.

Interior and Storage

The Model Y really stands out for interior usability. It has a much larger cabin with over 75 cubic feet(2.12 cubic meters) compared to 52(1.47 cubic meters) for the EV6. The difference feels smaller because of how well laid out the EV6 is, but you can't beat the massive trunk well and frunk. Today was a good reminder of why I liked that frunk in the wintertime when I loaded almost half of a shopping cart's worth of cold groceries in the frunk to keep them chilled on the hour-long ride home. It's tough to beat that convenience.

The center console of the Y is closed off to deliver a cockpit-like feel, which isn't as usable as the big open tub underneath the rotary shifter in the EV6. The wireless charger is a better compared to the single unit under the driver's arm on the EV6. I never used it on my EV6 because of wired CarPlay, but that's a language that Tesla does not speak, so I'll be using it from now on. My Y came with the optional white interior, which looks great when it's clean. I'm concerned about keeping it that way, as I'm a bit neurotic about having a decent-looking car.

The EV6 is a lot more usable than the size difference would suggest. The overall passenger room seems about even between the two, but the rear passengers sit lower than the Y. The long cargo area is great. The first photo below is my EV6 swallowing 10 bags of topsoil with a rake and hose on top. My boys were comfortably in the back seat for the ride home, and there was no noticeable squatting with the added weight. I was impressed.

IMG_8498.jpegIMG_7341.jpegIMG_7339.jpegIMG_7195.jpeg

Infotainment/Navigation.

This is the one area that Tesla has the clear advantage. This shouldn't be news to anyone here. The physical controls of the EV6 great, but it didn't take long to get used to Tesla's system again despite the critical reviews. I hate the fact that Tesla does not support CarPlay, but Tesla's in-car system remains the best in the business despite some rearranging since I last left. The second-generation system in my Y with the Ryzen processor is noticeably snappier than the one in my last Tesla. And even the old Intel chip would leave Kia's UVO system in the dust.

I never had a problem with the speed of Kia's system, though, and I always enjoyed how many options we had within the various menus. But my early-build EV6 lacked preconditioning, and it's been made clear that this feature cannot be added within a simple OTA update. The EV6 doesn't have any kind of trip-planning function and doesn't give you a battery estimate of what will remain once you arrive. That's a major oversight for a company that's been making EVs for three years now, but I expect it will eventually be corrected with an OTA update at some point down the line. This shouldn't be a hard problem for Kia to solve.

IMG_7143.jpegIMG_7183.jpeg

To my ear, Tesla has a clear advantage with their sound system. I sat in the EV6 for the first time with high hopes for the 14-speaker Meridian system, but it was a big disappointment. It sounded better than most unbranded systems that I've had in the past, and better than the one in my Standard Range '19 Model 3, but that's as much as I'd give it. I believe this is a calibration issue more than a speaker quality one, so I hope there's some kind of improvement that gets released in the future. In comparison, the Model Y has deep, powerful bass and clear highs that are somewhat neutered when driven by Bluetooth audio. Seems to be better with direct streaming through Spotify, though. I switched to Apple Music when they came out with lossless a couple of years ago, so I hope to get the holiday update to compare the two soon.

Other stuff.

Tesla has long had the best mobile app in the business, and it's gotten even better since I sold my 3. The Kia app is functionally braindead in comparison. It's capable of remotely starting the HVAC, but you only have a limited degree of control. You can set the climate temp at the start, but you can't change it without stopping the system and adjusting the settings within the app. Once you send the command, you have to wait 5-20 seconds for the signal to be sent to the car and the app confirms the change. If you try and change anything before that, you get an "Error: Command in progress." For some silly reason, you can remotely enable the steering wheel heater with climate, but not the seats? It's really bizarre to slide into a warm cabin, grab a toasty wheel, and have a freezing ass.

Kia advertises their 800v system, and for very good reason. The EV6 is a charging hero, and I don't expect the Model Y will be able to beat it. This thing would hold 220 kW from 10-60%, which made it charge the 77 kWh battery to 80% in about 20 minutes. I did this repeatedly on a road trip over the summer. Of course, this isn't possible in the winter with the lack of preconditioning, but later-build EV6es had that fixed. The Electrify America network is every bit the dumpster fire you've heard about, but when they work, it's fast. This won't last forever, though. I was also impressed with how strong the regen is on the EV6. It's noticeably stronger at all speeds to the Model Y despite the Y weighing 300 lbs less. You can do some neat things with 800v because you don't need as much current to do the same amount of work.

IMG_8524.JPEG

To conclude, my time spent with the EV6 was mostly filled with great thoughts. I really got to love the refinement and outstanding fast-charging capability. My previous experience was with a '19 Tesla Model 3 with a PTC heater that wasn't capable of achieving its 240-mile rated range in sunny weather rolling down a hill. The EV6 never disappointed me for range, and I was impressed with how well it manages energy. I certainly wouldn't rule out another Kia EV in the future, and Tesla needs to step up their game if they expect to retain their longstanding primacy in the EV market. An EV6 with a Tesla-like software experience would have the Model Y pretty well dialed in.

IMG_8498.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I believe that. My understanding is that the efficiency gain is the result of the front motor not being in motion. Similar to how ICE trucks with conventional 4WD systems would use a front axle disconnect system to gain highway fuel economy. Efficiency is gained because the front driveline is stationary whenever the system isn’t engaged, which imparts less frictional loss.

Unpowered electric motors don’t have the same parasitic loss as a heavy ICE powertrain, but it’s still there. The motors in my EV6 would spin about 10,000 RPMs at 75 MPH. It takes energy to move a rotor that fast.
The big difference is that Tesla uses an induction motor for the front, which is less efficient than a permanent magnet motor. The trade-off is that it can be "shut-down" electronically making it so you can be more efficient when you don't need it... The EV6 uses a permanent magnet motor in the front which is more efficient than an induction motor when in use, but the trade-off is that you cannot "shut it down", which is why it needs to be physically disconnected with a clutch, which adds weight, complexity, and a bit of lag when engaging, etc.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: nate704 and TomB985
No lag and instant acceleration was one of my reasons for buying a Tesla. I had a Subaru WRX (CVT) prior to the Tesla. Terrible lag from the CVT transmission. Anything with acceleration lag is a Hard Pass.

You don't need to put up with it in the EV6. Just switch to i-Pedal or Sport Mode and the front motor is locked in 100% of the time. It's every bit as snappy as my Y in those modes.
 
You don't need to put up with it in the EV6. Just switch to i-Pedal or Sport Mode and the front motor is locked in 100% of the time. It's every bit as snappy as my Y in those modes.
True, but then you lose efficiency. I get the best of both worlds in my MYP. I like the specs of the EV6 GT. However it's just not up to what the MYP can achieve in range.
 
True, but then you lose efficiency. I get the best of both worlds in my MYP. I like the specs of the EV6 GT. However it's just not up to what the MYP can achieve in range.

To be fair, the lag in Eco/Normal mode is still way better than anything you get in ICE. Its all relative. Also, past 75/80 mph, I believe the front motor actually engages. I average about 400wh/mi going 80-85mph on I-5 during my summer road trips. Not super great but charging was extremely fast...when the charger worked 😁
 
To be fair, the lag in Eco/Normal mode is still way better than anything you get in ICE. Its all relative. Also, past 75/80 mph, I believe the front motor actually engages. I average about 400wh/mi going 80-85mph on I-5 during my summer road trips. Not super great but charging was extremely fast...when the charger worked 😁
Good to know, I haven't driven one yet. My old WRX (CVT transmission) was beyond horrible for lag. Glad these are better than standard ICE lag.👍
 
Just for reference, the coupling of a CVT with a hybrid engine on my former car - a Ford C-Max (owned now by daughter) - was silky smooth, with no lag at all, including nice low-end power and good passing power as well (up to a limit - it was not a sports car :)). So a CVT does not have to laggy. The hybrid C-Max was quite a decent automobile at a reasonable price - too bad Ford made no effort to sell it. They just want to sell trucks and SUVs.
 
Just for reference, the coupling of a CVT with a hybrid engine on my former car - a Ford C-Max (owned now by daughter) - was silky smooth, with no lag at all, including nice low-end power and good passing power as well (up to a limit - it was not a sports car :)). So a CVT does not have to laggy. The hybrid C-Max was quite a decent automobile at a reasonable price - too bad Ford made no effort to sell it. They just want to sell trucks and SUVs.
Your lack of lag was probably due to the electric part of the drivetrain. Due to the nature of a CVT, they have a single metal drive belt that sends power through the transmission. It can not snap power otherwise the metal belt would snap or stretch.
 
Yes but efficiency suffers quite a bit. Also, the non GT version really runs out of steam past 60 mph.

That’s something I noticed right away. My EV6 seemed much faster below 50 MPH than my RWD Model 3. But above 60 MPH, the 3 would walk away from it. I think that was about power-to-weight ratio. My EV6 Wind was a 🐖 at 4,700 lbs, which is 300 lbs more than the larger Y. But the RWD Model 3 was about a thousand pounds lighter with nearly as much power.

320 HP pushing 4,700 lbs is quite snappy below highway speeds, but it runs out of steam.

Just for reference, the coupling of a CVT with a hybrid engine on my former car - a Ford C-Max (owned now by daughter) - was silky smooth, with no lag at all, including nice low-end power and good passing power as well (up to a limit - it was not a sports car :)). So a CVT does not have to laggy. The hybrid C-Max was quite a decent automobile at a reasonable price - too bad Ford made no effort to sell it. They just want to sell trucks and SUVs.

Your lack of lag was probably due to the electric part of the drivetrain. Due to the nature of a CVT, they have a single metal drive belt that sends power through the transmission. It can not snap power otherwise the metal belt would snap or stretch.

Nope, not these CVTs. Most hybrids use a variant of Toyota’s Hybrid Synergy Drive which has no belt at all. It’s a continuously engaged planetary gear set with a 3-way input that takes power from the ICE and two electric motors. The smallest motor/generator is what controls the speed of the ICE. Absolutely nothing like a belt-driven CVT, and they can respond much faster for two reasons: The small motor can let the engine rev a lot faster than a pulley can adjust, and the big motor provides torque instantly to make up while the ICE is spinning up.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: alexcue
Good afternoon, everyone.

I ended up trading Ruby the EV6 for a Model Y last night. My 5 months with the EV6 was fantastic, and the mechanical bits were every bit as awesome as I hoped going in. Ultimately, it was the lousy CCS charging experience combined with software that seemed like an afterthought that drove me to making the switch. For anyone interested, here are a few thoughts I have between the two.

View attachment 886384View attachment 886380View attachment 886382

Driving

The driving experience between the two is very different. The aggressive looks of the EV6 belie its fantastic road manners and refinement. I think my EV6 was the quietest and best-riding car I've ever had, and was MUCH better than the Model 3 that I had for two years previously. Everything was tight, there were no unusual noises, and it was a joy on the highway. In comparison, the Y has a choppier ride, a bit more noise, and a strange booming resonance when I go over bumps at higher speed. It's not enough to be intrusive and much better than my '19 Model 3 was, but not to the level of the EV6.

Compared to the athletic EV6, I think the Model Y looks like a bloated fish. But the handling is the polar opposite with the aggressive steering ratio and smaller wheel. Despite its much larger size, the Model Y is 330 lbs lighter, and you can feel it. My AWD EV6 had the slick front axle disconnect that improved high-speed efficiency, but it came at the expense of a noticeable lag as the motor spun up deliver the power that my right foot was requesting. The Y is locked in at all times, and power comes on like a hammer. The standard Y calibration has a throttle tip-in that's somewhere between normal and Sport Mode on the EV6.

For overall performance, they're extremely close. I've seen drag races where the EV6 was right next to the Model Y up to about 60 MPH, and that's about my experience. The RWD EV6 isn't anything special for performance, but my AWD model felt like a rocketship. I think my '19 Standard Range 3 would walk it above 70 MPH though; the power dropoff at higher speeds was more pronounced. Below 60, it wasn't even close. Up until the Model Y, that EV6 was the fastest thing I've owned.

Interior and Storage

The Model Y really stands out for interior usability. It has a much larger cabin with over 75 cubic feet(2.12 cubic meters) compared to 52(1.47 cubic meters) for the EV6. The difference feels smaller because of how well laid out the EV6 is, but you can't beat the massive trunk well and frunk. Today was a good reminder of why I liked that frunk in the wintertime when I loaded almost half of a shopping cart's worth of cold groceries in the frunk to keep them chilled on the hour-long ride home. It's tough to beat that convenience.

The center console of the Y is closed off to deliver a cockpit-like feel, which isn't as usable as the big open tub underneath the rotary shifter in the EV6. The wireless charger is a better compared to the single unit under the driver's arm on the EV6. I never used it on my EV6 because of wired CarPlay, but that's a language that Tesla does not speak, so I'll be using it from now on. My Y came with the optional white interior, which looks great when it's clean. I'm concerned about keeping it that way, as I'm a bit neurotic about having a decent-looking car.

The EV6 is a lot more usable than the size difference would suggest. The overall passenger room seems about even between the two, but the rear passengers sit lower than the Y. The long cargo area is great. The first photo below is my EV6 swallowing 10 bags of topsoil with a rake and hose on top. My boys were comfortably in the back seat for the ride home, and there was no noticeable squatting with the added weight. I was impressed.

View attachment 886383View attachment 886385View attachment 886386View attachment 886387

Infotainment/Navigation.

This is the one area that Tesla has the clear advantage. This shouldn't be news to anyone here. The physical controls of the EV6 great, but it didn't take long to get used to Tesla's system again despite the critical reviews. I hate the fact that Tesla does not support CarPlay, but Tesla's in-car system remains the best in the business despite some rearranging since I last left. The second-generation system in my Y with the Ryzen processor is noticeably snappier than the one in my last Tesla. And even the old Intel chip would leave Kia's UVO system in the dust.

I never had a problem with the speed of Kia's system, though, and I always enjoyed how many options we had within the various menus. But my early-build EV6 lacked preconditioning, and it's been made clear that this feature cannot be added within a simple OTA update. The EV6 doesn't have any kind of trip-planning function and doesn't give you a battery estimate of what will remain once you arrive. That's a major oversight for a company that's been making EVs for three years now, but I expect it will eventually be corrected with an OTA update at some point down the line. This shouldn't be a hard problem for Kia to solve.

View attachment 886389View attachment 886388

To my ear, Tesla has a clear advantage with their sound system. I sat in the EV6 for the first time with high hopes for the 14-speaker Meridian system, but it was a big disappointment. It sounded better than most unbranded systems that I've had in the past, and better than the one in my Standard Range '19 Model 3, but that's as much as I'd give it. I believe this is a calibration issue more than a speaker quality one, so I hope there's some kind of improvement that gets released in the future. In comparison, the Model Y has deep, powerful bass and clear highs that are somewhat neutered when driven by Bluetooth audio. Seems to be better with direct streaming through Spotify, though. I switched to Apple Music when they came out with lossless a couple of years ago, so I hope to get the holiday update to compare the two soon.

Other stuff.

Tesla has long had the best mobile app in the business, and it's gotten even better since I sold my 3. The Kia app is functionally braindead in comparison. It's capable of remotely starting the HVAC, but you only have a limited degree of control. You can set the climate temp at the start, but you can't change it without stopping the system and adjusting the settings within the app. Once you send the command, you have to wait 5-20 seconds for the signal to be sent to the car and the app confirms the change. If you try and change anything before that, you get an "Error: Command in progress." For some silly reason, you can remotely enable the steering wheel heater with climate, but not the seats? It's really bizarre to slide into a warm cabin, grab a toasty wheel, and have a freezing ass.

Kia advertises their 800v system, and for very good reason. The EV6 is a charging hero, and I don't expect the Model Y will be able to beat it. This thing would hold 220 kW from 10-60%, which made it charge the 77 kWh battery to 80% in about 20 minutes. I did this repeatedly on a road trip over the summer. Of course, this isn't possible in the winter with the lack of preconditioning, but later-build EV6es had that fixed. The Electrify America network is every bit the dumpster fire you've heard about, but when they work, it's fast. This won't last forever, though. I was also impressed with how strong the regen is on the EV6. It's noticeably stronger at all speeds to the Model Y despite the Y weighing 300 lbs less. You can do some neat things with 800v because you don't need as much current to do the same amount of work.

View attachment 886381

To conclude, my time spent with the EV6 was mostly filled with great thoughts. I really got to love the refinement and outstanding fast-charging capability. My previous experience was with a '19 Tesla Model 3 with a PTC heater that wasn't capable of achieving its 240-mile rated range in sunny weather rolling down a hill. The EV6 never disappointed me for range, and I was impressed with how well it manages energy. I certainly wouldn't rule out another Kia EV in the future, and Tesla needs to step up their game if they expect to retain their longstanding primacy in the EV market. An EV6 with a Tesla-like software experience would have the Model Y pretty well dialed in.

View attachment 886383
Thank you for taking the time to put your thoughts coming from the EV6 to a Tesla. I agree and one of the main reasons I went with Tesla is the SC network. Yesterday, I used a CCS for the first time and was struggling trying to get the adapter in the hole and stick it in and out and wiggling it around for the car to recognize it. It took like 5 minutes before I was going to give up and go to a SC. I am returning the CCS and will stick with Tesla and the J1772 chargers.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Dayreg
... Yesterday, I used a CCS for the first time and was struggling trying to get the adapter in the hole and stick it in and out and wiggling it around for the car to recognize it. It took like 5 minutes before I was going to give up and go to a SC. I am returning the CCS and will stick with Tesla and the J1772 chargers.
I've used my Tesla CCS1 adapter many times and the issue has never been inserting it into the Tesla charge port but rather with the EA infrastructure. I urge you to give it another try as there should be no problem putting the adapter plug into your EV.

Rich


Attaching adapter to CCS1.
dipTb9B.jpg


Wifey can do it!!
wNnJr54.jpg


At another EA station.
7x5I5sr.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: TomB985
I've used my Tesla CCS1 adapter many times and the issue has never been inserting it into the Tesla charge port but rather with the EA infrastructure. I urge you to give it another try as there should be no problem putting the adapter plug into your EV.

Rich


Attaching adapter to CCS1.
dipTb9B.jpg


Wifey can do it!!
wNnJr54.jpg


At another EA station.
7x5I5sr.jpg
Love that!! okay, I will try again. I am going to return the Lectron and purchase the Tesla one and see if I get the same result. It could have been the actual one I used.. who knows..
 
  • Like
Reactions: RichAZ/CapeCod
Love that!! okay, I will try again. I am going to return the Lectron and purchase the Tesla one and see if I get the same result. It could have been the actual one I used.. who knows..
OK, got it now. Thought you were having trouble with the Tesla adapter, which didn't compute. Yeah, give the Tesla unit a try. It really is a piece of cake to use. No guarantees on how the EA system will work out for ya!

Rich
 
That’s something I noticed right away. My EV6 seemed much faster below 50 MPH than my RWD Model 3. But above 60 MPH, the 3 would walk away from it. I think that was about power-to-weight ratio. My EV6 Wind was a 🐖 at 4,700 lbs, which is 300 lbs more than the larger Y. But the RWD Model 3 was about a thousand pounds lighter with nearly as much power.

320 HP pushing 4,700 lbs is quite snappy below highway speeds, but it runs out of steam.





Nope, not these CVTs. Most hybrids use a variant of Toyota’s Hybrid Synergy Drive which has no belt at all. It’s a continuously engaged planetary gear set with a 3-way input that takes power from the ICE and two electric motors. The smallest motor/generator is what controls the speed of the ICE. Absolutely nothing like a belt-driven CVT, and they can respond much faster for two reasons: The small motor can let the engine rev a lot faster than a pulley can adjust, and the big motor provides torque instantly to make up while the ICE is spinning up.
 
If you want to debate the efficency and engineering of Tesla compared to legacy ev's, I welcome you to look under the hood and frunks.
The amount of parts bin kludge engineering is funny. Tesla is completely different and such a clean slate, engineered purely as an ev.

If you want to debate body and build engineering... yeah the legacy makers have it over Tesla. The cost cutting Tesla does in manufacturing is, in some areas, unacceptable.

For the consumer, both are good products. Knowing what I know now, i'm interested to see how Teslas hold up in 10 yrs. The good thing is there will be a lot of parts cars floating around if dismantlers can figure out a good system to dismantle ev's and send the batteries off for recycling or secondary market sales.