Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

EV6 to a Model Y

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Good afternoon, everyone.

I ended up trading Ruby the EV6 for a Model Y last night. My 5 months with the EV6 was fantastic, and the mechanical bits were every bit as awesome as I hoped going in. Ultimately, it was the lousy CCS charging experience combined with software that seemed like an afterthought that drove me to making the switch. For anyone interested, here are a few thoughts I have between the two.

IMG_8333.jpegIMG_7391.jpegIMG_8163.jpeg

Driving

The driving experience between the two is very different. The aggressive looks of the EV6 belie its fantastic road manners and refinement. I think my EV6 was the quietest and best-riding car I've ever had, and was MUCH better than the Model 3 that I had for two years previously. Everything was tight, there were no unusual noises, and it was a joy on the highway. In comparison, the Y has a choppier ride, a bit more noise, and a strange booming resonance when I go over bumps at higher speed. It's not enough to be intrusive and much better than my '19 Model 3 was, but not to the level of the EV6.

Compared to the athletic EV6, I think the Model Y looks like a bloated fish. But the handling is the polar opposite with the aggressive steering ratio and smaller wheel. Despite its much larger size, the Model Y is 330 lbs lighter, and you can feel it. My AWD EV6 had the slick front axle disconnect that improved high-speed efficiency, but it came at the expense of a noticeable lag as the motor spun up deliver the power that my right foot was requesting. The Y is locked in at all times, and power comes on like a hammer. The standard Y calibration has a throttle tip-in that's somewhere between normal and Sport Mode on the EV6.

For overall performance, they're extremely close. I've seen drag races where the EV6 was right next to the Model Y up to about 60 MPH, and that's about my experience. The RWD EV6 isn't anything special for performance, but my AWD model felt like a rocketship. I think my '19 Standard Range 3 would walk it above 70 MPH though; the power dropoff at higher speeds was more pronounced. Below 60, it wasn't even close. Up until the Model Y, that EV6 was the fastest thing I've owned.

Interior and Storage

The Model Y really stands out for interior usability. It has a much larger cabin with over 75 cubic feet(2.12 cubic meters) compared to 52(1.47 cubic meters) for the EV6. The difference feels smaller because of how well laid out the EV6 is, but you can't beat the massive trunk well and frunk. Today was a good reminder of why I liked that frunk in the wintertime when I loaded almost half of a shopping cart's worth of cold groceries in the frunk to keep them chilled on the hour-long ride home. It's tough to beat that convenience.

The center console of the Y is closed off to deliver a cockpit-like feel, which isn't as usable as the big open tub underneath the rotary shifter in the EV6. The wireless charger is a better compared to the single unit under the driver's arm on the EV6. I never used it on my EV6 because of wired CarPlay, but that's a language that Tesla does not speak, so I'll be using it from now on. My Y came with the optional white interior, which looks great when it's clean. I'm concerned about keeping it that way, as I'm a bit neurotic about having a decent-looking car.

The EV6 is a lot more usable than the size difference would suggest. The overall passenger room seems about even between the two, but the rear passengers sit lower than the Y. The long cargo area is great. The first photo below is my EV6 swallowing 10 bags of topsoil with a rake and hose on top. My boys were comfortably in the back seat for the ride home, and there was no noticeable squatting with the added weight. I was impressed.

IMG_8498.jpegIMG_7341.jpegIMG_7339.jpegIMG_7195.jpeg

Infotainment/Navigation.

This is the one area that Tesla has the clear advantage. This shouldn't be news to anyone here. The physical controls of the EV6 great, but it didn't take long to get used to Tesla's system again despite the critical reviews. I hate the fact that Tesla does not support CarPlay, but Tesla's in-car system remains the best in the business despite some rearranging since I last left. The second-generation system in my Y with the Ryzen processor is noticeably snappier than the one in my last Tesla. And even the old Intel chip would leave Kia's UVO system in the dust.

I never had a problem with the speed of Kia's system, though, and I always enjoyed how many options we had within the various menus. But my early-build EV6 lacked preconditioning, and it's been made clear that this feature cannot be added within a simple OTA update. The EV6 doesn't have any kind of trip-planning function and doesn't give you a battery estimate of what will remain once you arrive. That's a major oversight for a company that's been making EVs for three years now, but I expect it will eventually be corrected with an OTA update at some point down the line. This shouldn't be a hard problem for Kia to solve.

IMG_7143.jpegIMG_7183.jpeg

To my ear, Tesla has a clear advantage with their sound system. I sat in the EV6 for the first time with high hopes for the 14-speaker Meridian system, but it was a big disappointment. It sounded better than most unbranded systems that I've had in the past, and better than the one in my Standard Range '19 Model 3, but that's as much as I'd give it. I believe this is a calibration issue more than a speaker quality one, so I hope there's some kind of improvement that gets released in the future. In comparison, the Model Y has deep, powerful bass and clear highs that are somewhat neutered when driven by Bluetooth audio. Seems to be better with direct streaming through Spotify, though. I switched to Apple Music when they came out with lossless a couple of years ago, so I hope to get the holiday update to compare the two soon.

Other stuff.

Tesla has long had the best mobile app in the business, and it's gotten even better since I sold my 3. The Kia app is functionally braindead in comparison. It's capable of remotely starting the HVAC, but you only have a limited degree of control. You can set the climate temp at the start, but you can't change it without stopping the system and adjusting the settings within the app. Once you send the command, you have to wait 5-20 seconds for the signal to be sent to the car and the app confirms the change. If you try and change anything before that, you get an "Error: Command in progress." For some silly reason, you can remotely enable the steering wheel heater with climate, but not the seats? It's really bizarre to slide into a warm cabin, grab a toasty wheel, and have a freezing ass.

Kia advertises their 800v system, and for very good reason. The EV6 is a charging hero, and I don't expect the Model Y will be able to beat it. This thing would hold 220 kW from 10-60%, which made it charge the 77 kWh battery to 80% in about 20 minutes. I did this repeatedly on a road trip over the summer. Of course, this isn't possible in the winter with the lack of preconditioning, but later-build EV6es had that fixed. The Electrify America network is every bit the dumpster fire you've heard about, but when they work, it's fast. This won't last forever, though. I was also impressed with how strong the regen is on the EV6. It's noticeably stronger at all speeds to the Model Y despite the Y weighing 300 lbs less. You can do some neat things with 800v because you don't need as much current to do the same amount of work.

IMG_8524.JPEG

To conclude, my time spent with the EV6 was mostly filled with great thoughts. I really got to love the refinement and outstanding fast-charging capability. My previous experience was with a '19 Tesla Model 3 with a PTC heater that wasn't capable of achieving its 240-mile rated range in sunny weather rolling down a hill. The EV6 never disappointed me for range, and I was impressed with how well it manages energy. I certainly wouldn't rule out another Kia EV in the future, and Tesla needs to step up their game if they expect to retain their longstanding primacy in the EV market. An EV6 with a Tesla-like software experience would have the Model Y pretty well dialed in.

IMG_8498.jpeg
 
Last edited:
All I'm saying is that your wh/mi numbers are far higher than the numbers i've seen on the Model 3 forums for RWD variants. I drove a Model Y up and down California during Thanksgiving for 8 days and my average was about 350 wh/mi which is slightly better than my EV6 at highway speeds. They are pretty much a wash. A Model 3 is SIGNIFICANTLY more efficient than either car on average so I think something wasn't right with your car.

First let me say, I believe you when you are reporting the energy consumption on your old M3... there was something seriously wrong with that M3!

Keith
My experience seemed to match what others found at the time. I spent a lot of time on this forum and others at the time reading about range loss. The overall impression that I got was that it was normal.

At 0*, that car was good for just over 100 miles. So just over a 50% range loss in those cold temperatures. In comparison, my Model Y loses nearly the same amount. At -5*, my range based on my consumption data would have been 164 miles with a full charge. This is less reduction than my Model 3, which makes sense because it has a more efficient heating system.

Respectfully, I just think people can't wrap their heads around the fact that I don't drive like many others. And people on this forum take issue with the idea that another car may be more efficient than a Tesla, and try and find ways to justify why that's not the case.
 
It's tough to get a meaningful comparison. I used TeslaFi to gather data on my 2019 Model 3 and my current Y, but there was never a good way to do that with the EV6. I also don't have any experience driving the two in similar conditions because of the cold weather that hit Minnesota the night that I drove the Y home.

But from my experience, my AWD EV6 was more efficient than my 2019 Model 3 SR+ was in warmer weather. I drove from my parents' house in New Hampshire to my house in Minnesota back in May of 2021 with my Model 3. I made the same trip in the EV6 at the end of July of this year. I went on a longer route in 2021, but otherwise the conditions were very similar. The A/C in the Model 3 didn't work as hard because of the more temperate weather. The trip this year with the EV6, in comparison, was in much hotter weather, and I probably drove a couple MPH faster.

And the EV6 was more efficient.

Model 3 in 2021:

View attachment 888946

EV6 in July, 2022:

View attachment 888947

392 wh/mi for the Model 3 vs. 312 wh/mi for the EV6. I was very impressed.

My experience seemed to match what others found at the time. I spent a lot of time on this forum and others at the time reading about range loss. The overall impression that I got was that it was normal.

At 0*, that car was good for just over 100 miles. So just over a 50% range loss in those cold temperatures. In comparison, my Model Y loses nearly the same amount. At -5*, my range based on my consumption data would have been 164 miles with a full charge. This is less reduction than my Model 3, which makes sense because it has a more efficient heating system.

Respectfully, I just think people can't wrap their heads around the fact that I don't drive like many others. And people on this forum take issue with the idea that another car may be more efficient than a Tesla, and try and find ways to justify why that's not the case.

You literally said your EV6 was more efficient than your Model 3 in warm weather. I quoted this in post 152. I don't dispute your cold weather findings but in warm weather, my M3P gets 290 wh/mi vs. my EV6 that gets 350 wh/mi. I have the least efficient Model 3 and i'm getting significantly better efficiency than you and i'm pegged at 80-85 miles on the highway.

We have over 10k miles on the Ev6 with the same spec car you do and there is no way its more efficient than the Model 3 in warm weather. Its not even close and my personal experience mirrors the same efficiency i'm seeing on both the EV6 forums and the Model 3 forums. In fact, I've never seen a Model 3 RWD get anything near 400 wh/mi in warm weather unless someone was seriously hooning it in canyons. I can't touch 400 wh/mi average unless i'm in track mode driving extremely quick in canyon runs in warm weather.
 
  • Like
Reactions: boredwitless
True re not being able to integrate non-Tesla chargers into the travel planning. But given the unreliability of non-Tesla charging networks - discussed extensively in this thread - would you actually want to rely on other chargers in your travel planning?

This is something that I have considered in debating whether to get a CCS adapter for our Model 3 - i.e., while it might be handy to have access to CCS charging in some situations, the chargers that I plan to actually rely on will still be Tesla's.
Oh, I absolutely prefer superchargers for several reasons, but there are times when you need other options.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RayzorEV
True re not being able to integrate non-Tesla chargers into the travel planning. But given the unreliability of non-Tesla charging networks - discussed extensively in this thread - would you actually want to rely on other chargers in your travel planning?

This is something that I have considered in debating whether to get a CCS adapter for our Model 3 - i.e., while it might be handy to have access to CCS charging in some situations, the chargers that I plan to actually rely on will still be Tesla's.

I use my CCS adapter as an option to avoid V2 Superchargers. But I don't rely on them, when I make travel plans the CCS will be my primary choice over a V2 Supercharger, but I only use them if there is a Supercharger nearby to use as a fallback if the CCS is not working.

Keith
 
I use my CCS adapter as an option to avoid V2 Superchargers. But I don't rely on them, when I make travel plans the CCS will be my primary choice over a V2 Supercharger, but I only use them if there is a Supercharger nearby to use as a fallback if the CCS is not working.

Keith

That’s very interesting. V3 Superchargers weren’t real common when I sold my 3 back in 2021, but I don’t remember a big difference for the little battery in my SR+. It would top out at 140 kW with the V3 units, and I think V2 would deliver around 120-ish. How do speeds compare between a functioning CCS unit and a V2?
 
  • Like
Reactions: timberlights
That’s very interesting. V3 Superchargers weren’t real common when I sold my 3 back in 2021, but I don’t remember a big difference for the little battery in my SR+. It would top out at 140 kW with the V3 units, and I think V2 would deliver around 120-ish. How do speeds compare between a functioning CCS unit and a V2?
A well functioning CCS unit using the current standard of 500 amps max will put 190ish KW into a model Y. The new standard (not implemented most places yet) is 800 amps max, and when that comes on line they will be able to feed the Model Y as much power as it asks for, matching V3 power.

My problem with V2 is that they put out between 120 KW and 150 KW only if you don't have to share. If it is a busy travel day you will be sharing power with another car. Best thing about the V3 isn't the 250 KW peak power (that is for such a short time it makes little difference on your overall charge time) it is the fact that they don't share power between them, so your charge time doesn't double when someone pulls up next to you.

Keith

PS: Take note of the "well functioning" emphasis above... this is why I only use them if there is a Supercharger near by as a backup :D
 
Good information, thank you. I didn't know that V3 Superchargers didn't split power with their neighbors. I'm still trying to come up with justification to fork out $250 for the CCS adapter after spending $62K to get away from CCS.

CCS's value will improve with their reliability, which seems to have a long way to go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fourdoor
A well functioning CCS unit using the current standard of 500 amps max will put 190ish KW into a model Y. The new standard (not implemented most places yet) is 800 amps max, and when that comes on line they will be able to feed the Model Y as much power as it asks for, matching V3 power.

My problem with V2 is that they put out between 120 KW and 150 KW only if you don't have to share. If it is a busy travel day you will be sharing power with another car. Best thing about the V3 isn't the 250 KW peak power (that is for such a short time it makes little difference on your overall charge time) it is the fact that they don't share power between them, so your charge time doesn't double when someone pulls up next to you.

Keith

PS: Take note of the "well functioning" emphasis above... this is why I only use them if there is a Supercharger near by as a backup :D
Granted, but when I last looked at a CCS charging map for places along routes I normally travel in this part of Canada, it seemed that a large proportion of them were 50 kW units. I think that I would prefer even a V2 Supercharger over that - plus, of course, the V2 Supercharger actually will be likely to work, while the functioning of the CCS charger will be hit-and-miss.
 
Granted, but when I last looked at a CCS charging map for places along routes I normally travel in this part of Canada, it seemed that a large proportion of them were 50 kW units. I think that I would prefer even a V2 Supercharger over that - plus, of course, the V2 Supercharger actually will be likely to work, while the functioning of the CCS charger will be hit-and-miss.

Yup, even a shared V2 (or urban supercharger) is better than a 50 KW CCS charger. Using plugshare you can filter stations based on minimum power output. And if there are not currently any high power CCS stations where you plan on driving don't waste money on the CCS adapter :)

Keith
 
That’s very interesting. V3 Superchargers weren’t real common when I sold my 3 back in 2021, but I don’t remember a big difference for the little battery in my SR+. It would top out at 140 kW with the V3 units, and I think V2 would deliver around 120-ish. How do speeds compare between a functioning CCS unit and a V2?

It's also worth remembering that the SR+'s maximum charging rate is lower than all other Model 3s, so it wasn't able to take full advantage of V3 chargers in the first place.

V2 Superchargers hit 150KW maximum, same as most US EA chargers until recently.

V3 Supercharger max out at 250KW, while newer EA CCS stations are 350KW max.

Some Taycans and eTron GTs can pull up to 270KW, while some Teslas can pull up to 250KW, but only for a short while and under the right conditions.

For maintaining elevated charging rates for the longest time, Hyundai/Kia's E-GMP platform is among the best, though some Lucid models do well in that metric too.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: TomB985
It's also worth remembering that the SR+'s maximum charging rate is lower than all other Model 3s, so it wasn't able to take full advantage of V3 chargers in the first place.

V2 Superchargers hit 150KW maximum, same as most US EA chargers until recently.

V3 Supercharger max out at 250KW, while newer EA CCS stations are 350KW max.

Some Taycans and eTron GTs can pull up to 270KW, while some Teslas can pull up to 250KW, but only for a short while and under the right conditions.

For maintaining elevated charging rates for the longest time, Hyundai/Kia's E-GMP platform is among the best, though some Lucid models do well in that metric too.

My experience with my M3P is really good in terms of charging...especially at a V3 Supercharger. I've done about 23 minutes with a preconditioned battery and 10-80% charge...but i have the 2019 model with the NCA pack vs the newer NCMs. My EV6 is usually about that speed...i've only hit over 220kw once with the EV6 as it has no preconditioning but it sustains the high rate of charge longer. In practice though, the EV6 is more versatile meaning you can get to a charger with 50% and it really boogies to 80% even without preconditioning.

Its also way easier to find V3 Superchargers than 350kw EA stations...i'm not going to go into reliability because EA is garbage.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: TomB985
It's also worth remembering that the SR+'s maximum charging rate is lower than all other Model 3s, so it wasn't able to take full advantage of V3 chargers in the first place.

V2 Superchargers hit 150KW maximum, same as most US EA chargers until recently.

V3 Supercharger max out at 250KW, while newer EA CCS stations are 350KW max.

Some Taycans and eTron GTs can pull up to 270KW, while some Teslas can pull up to 250KW, but only for a short while and under the right conditions.

For maintaining elevated charging rates for the longest time, Hyundai/Kia's E-GMP platform is among the best, though some Lucid models do well in that metric too.

Thanks for the detail. I was aware that the smaller battery in my SR+ was more limited on V3, but the details were a bit fuzzy. I’ll probably go for the CCS adapter to have some more options. I remember how great the Supercharger network was, and I’ve been impressed with how many more stations have been installed since I lost my Model 3 18 months ago.

The EV6 was really impressive with a properly-functioning charger, but the experience was really iffy. It was great when it worked, though!

1672345002780.jpeg
 
All those cars are so close, its nearly indistinguishable though. Like if you want to pass someone, you're going to have to pull at least a car length and a half ahead (and thats if you want to cut them off). Even from a launch, if you cant decisively get in front of someone, you're going to miss your turn ;)

These guys were running a 1/2mi too!!! Thats definitely into felonies (if you're not on an airstrip/track).

In either case, a bunch of very fast cars!
 
New cars vs chrome trimmed teslas. It's hilarious how quiet it all is, love it. They could be hooning down the street and you'd never know it.

If they brought the new Model X (non-Plaid), it would have been 2nd. Of course, if they just put the Model S dual motor setup in the Model 3, it would smoke them all especially from a highway roll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thesmokingman
Thanks for sharing that, very interesting.

Seeing the EV6 GT trounce cars that sell for twice as much is impressive. It shows how much of a value the Model 3 Performance is, as well as how nice of a job Kia and Hyundai’s engineers did with their E-GMP cars. Tesla will have some real competition if their software teams get to that level.