Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

EV6 to a Model Y

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Good afternoon, everyone.

I ended up trading Ruby the EV6 for a Model Y last night. My 5 months with the EV6 was fantastic, and the mechanical bits were every bit as awesome as I hoped going in. Ultimately, it was the lousy CCS charging experience combined with software that seemed like an afterthought that drove me to making the switch. For anyone interested, here are a few thoughts I have between the two.

IMG_8333.jpegIMG_7391.jpegIMG_8163.jpeg

Driving

The driving experience between the two is very different. The aggressive looks of the EV6 belie its fantastic road manners and refinement. I think my EV6 was the quietest and best-riding car I've ever had, and was MUCH better than the Model 3 that I had for two years previously. Everything was tight, there were no unusual noises, and it was a joy on the highway. In comparison, the Y has a choppier ride, a bit more noise, and a strange booming resonance when I go over bumps at higher speed. It's not enough to be intrusive and much better than my '19 Model 3 was, but not to the level of the EV6.

Compared to the athletic EV6, I think the Model Y looks like a bloated fish. But the handling is the polar opposite with the aggressive steering ratio and smaller wheel. Despite its much larger size, the Model Y is 330 lbs lighter, and you can feel it. My AWD EV6 had the slick front axle disconnect that improved high-speed efficiency, but it came at the expense of a noticeable lag as the motor spun up deliver the power that my right foot was requesting. The Y is locked in at all times, and power comes on like a hammer. The standard Y calibration has a throttle tip-in that's somewhere between normal and Sport Mode on the EV6.

For overall performance, they're extremely close. I've seen drag races where the EV6 was right next to the Model Y up to about 60 MPH, and that's about my experience. The RWD EV6 isn't anything special for performance, but my AWD model felt like a rocketship. I think my '19 Standard Range 3 would walk it above 70 MPH though; the power dropoff at higher speeds was more pronounced. Below 60, it wasn't even close. Up until the Model Y, that EV6 was the fastest thing I've owned.

Interior and Storage

The Model Y really stands out for interior usability. It has a much larger cabin with over 75 cubic feet(2.12 cubic meters) compared to 52(1.47 cubic meters) for the EV6. The difference feels smaller because of how well laid out the EV6 is, but you can't beat the massive trunk well and frunk. Today was a good reminder of why I liked that frunk in the wintertime when I loaded almost half of a shopping cart's worth of cold groceries in the frunk to keep them chilled on the hour-long ride home. It's tough to beat that convenience.

The center console of the Y is closed off to deliver a cockpit-like feel, which isn't as usable as the big open tub underneath the rotary shifter in the EV6. The wireless charger is a better compared to the single unit under the driver's arm on the EV6. I never used it on my EV6 because of wired CarPlay, but that's a language that Tesla does not speak, so I'll be using it from now on. My Y came with the optional white interior, which looks great when it's clean. I'm concerned about keeping it that way, as I'm a bit neurotic about having a decent-looking car.

The EV6 is a lot more usable than the size difference would suggest. The overall passenger room seems about even between the two, but the rear passengers sit lower than the Y. The long cargo area is great. The first photo below is my EV6 swallowing 10 bags of topsoil with a rake and hose on top. My boys were comfortably in the back seat for the ride home, and there was no noticeable squatting with the added weight. I was impressed.

IMG_8498.jpegIMG_7341.jpegIMG_7339.jpegIMG_7195.jpeg

Infotainment/Navigation.

This is the one area that Tesla has the clear advantage. This shouldn't be news to anyone here. The physical controls of the EV6 great, but it didn't take long to get used to Tesla's system again despite the critical reviews. I hate the fact that Tesla does not support CarPlay, but Tesla's in-car system remains the best in the business despite some rearranging since I last left. The second-generation system in my Y with the Ryzen processor is noticeably snappier than the one in my last Tesla. And even the old Intel chip would leave Kia's UVO system in the dust.

I never had a problem with the speed of Kia's system, though, and I always enjoyed how many options we had within the various menus. But my early-build EV6 lacked preconditioning, and it's been made clear that this feature cannot be added within a simple OTA update. The EV6 doesn't have any kind of trip-planning function and doesn't give you a battery estimate of what will remain once you arrive. That's a major oversight for a company that's been making EVs for three years now, but I expect it will eventually be corrected with an OTA update at some point down the line. This shouldn't be a hard problem for Kia to solve.

IMG_7143.jpegIMG_7183.jpeg

To my ear, Tesla has a clear advantage with their sound system. I sat in the EV6 for the first time with high hopes for the 14-speaker Meridian system, but it was a big disappointment. It sounded better than most unbranded systems that I've had in the past, and better than the one in my Standard Range '19 Model 3, but that's as much as I'd give it. I believe this is a calibration issue more than a speaker quality one, so I hope there's some kind of improvement that gets released in the future. In comparison, the Model Y has deep, powerful bass and clear highs that are somewhat neutered when driven by Bluetooth audio. Seems to be better with direct streaming through Spotify, though. I switched to Apple Music when they came out with lossless a couple of years ago, so I hope to get the holiday update to compare the two soon.

Other stuff.

Tesla has long had the best mobile app in the business, and it's gotten even better since I sold my 3. The Kia app is functionally braindead in comparison. It's capable of remotely starting the HVAC, but you only have a limited degree of control. You can set the climate temp at the start, but you can't change it without stopping the system and adjusting the settings within the app. Once you send the command, you have to wait 5-20 seconds for the signal to be sent to the car and the app confirms the change. If you try and change anything before that, you get an "Error: Command in progress." For some silly reason, you can remotely enable the steering wheel heater with climate, but not the seats? It's really bizarre to slide into a warm cabin, grab a toasty wheel, and have a freezing ass.

Kia advertises their 800v system, and for very good reason. The EV6 is a charging hero, and I don't expect the Model Y will be able to beat it. This thing would hold 220 kW from 10-60%, which made it charge the 77 kWh battery to 80% in about 20 minutes. I did this repeatedly on a road trip over the summer. Of course, this isn't possible in the winter with the lack of preconditioning, but later-build EV6es had that fixed. The Electrify America network is every bit the dumpster fire you've heard about, but when they work, it's fast. This won't last forever, though. I was also impressed with how strong the regen is on the EV6. It's noticeably stronger at all speeds to the Model Y despite the Y weighing 300 lbs less. You can do some neat things with 800v because you don't need as much current to do the same amount of work.

IMG_8524.JPEG

To conclude, my time spent with the EV6 was mostly filled with great thoughts. I really got to love the refinement and outstanding fast-charging capability. My previous experience was with a '19 Tesla Model 3 with a PTC heater that wasn't capable of achieving its 240-mile rated range in sunny weather rolling down a hill. The EV6 never disappointed me for range, and I was impressed with how well it manages energy. I certainly wouldn't rule out another Kia EV in the future, and Tesla needs to step up their game if they expect to retain their longstanding primacy in the EV market. An EV6 with a Tesla-like software experience would have the Model Y pretty well dialed in.

IMG_8498.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Thanks for sharing that, very interesting.

Seeing the EV6 GT trounce cars that sell for twice as much is impressive. It shows how much of a value the Model 3 Performance is, as well as how nice of a job Kia and Hyundai’s engineers did with their E-GMP cars. Tesla will have some real competition if their software teams get to that level.
Not really, one or two runs pouch cells have no problem. Try to run on a track for more than 10 minutes and even the Porsche/Audis will slow to a crawl due to throttling. The rest of them will shrivel up too except for the M3P.

 
  • Like
Reactions: nate704
Not really, one or two runs pouch cells have no problem. Try to run on a track for more than 10 minutes and even the Porsche/Audis will slow to a crawl due to throttling. The rest of them will shrivel up too except for the M3P.


That’s good to know, but I’m not a race car driver. I don’t know anyone who is, and I can’t think of anyone I’ve met who would care about track endurance when they bought a car.
 
That’s good to know, but I’m not a race car driver. I don’t know anyone who is, and I can’t think of anyone I’ve met who would care about track endurance when they bought a car.
That's a bizarre response. That'll never affect me... Ignores the facts that the cooling systems in all other cars are subpar and they cannot sustain max load for more 10 minutes. Like there could never a use case where superior battery cooling would be an advantage lmao.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WADan
That's a bizarre response. That'll never affect me... Ignores the facts that the cooling systems in all other cars are subpar and they cannot sustain max load for more 10 minutes. Like there could never a use case where superior battery cooling would be an advantage lmao.

That's fine. Maybe I'm the only weirdo out there who could care less. I'll poll my friends as time permits and see if they give a crap about battery cooling and track endurance.
 
That’s good to know, but I’m not a race car driver. I don’t know anyone who is, and I can’t think of anyone I’ve met who would care about track endurance when they bought a car.
I think some, perhaps a small percentage, of EV6 GT buyers would care about track endurance, similar to some MYP buyers such as myself. However, I think the EV6 GT might run into more of a problem with battery range instead of overheating when it comes to track use.

I took my MYP to a local track at Dakota County Technical College for performance driving experience 4 times during the last summer in which they provide 7 sessions of 20 minute runs. As I became a bit more proficient at driving the course, I found that my MYP could do 4 sessions before having to cut the 5th session short in order to have about 13% battery left for me to get home (IIRC, I was doing 800+Wh/Mi on the track). If the EV6 GT's real world range is similar or less than the EPA 206 miles, I think it would not make a great car for performance driving on a track since it would run out of juice pretty quick. If I was in the market today, that might be a dealbreaker for me on the EV6 GT.

Anyway, I'm sure not very many people would care about that stuff when they buy these higher performance variants, but I figured that since I have a supposedly pretty capable car, I might as well try it on a track and have some fun.
 
That's fine. Maybe I'm the only weirdo out there who could care less. I'll poll my friends as time permits and see if they give a crap about battery cooling and track endurance.
car manufactures participate in the race, especially endurance ones in order to test and develop the better system, parts, and software/hardware,. When they are successful, usually that directly relates to higher sales.
 
I think some, perhaps a small percentage, of EV6 GT buyers would care about track endurance, similar to some MYP buyers such as myself. However, I think the EV6 GT might run into more of a problem with battery range instead of overheating when it comes to track use.

I took my MYP to a local track at Dakota County Technical College for performance driving experience 4 times during the last summer in which they provide 7 sessions of 20 minute runs. As I became a bit more proficient at driving the course, I found that my MYP could do 4 sessions before having to cut the 5th session short in order to have about 13% battery left for me to get home (IIRC, I was doing 800+Wh/Mi on the track). If the EV6 GT's real world range is similar or less than the EPA 206 miles, I think it would not make a great car for performance driving on a track since it would run out of juice pretty quick. If I was in the market today, that might be a dealbreaker for me on the EV6 GT.

Anyway, I'm sure not very many people would care about that stuff when they buy these higher performance variants, but I figured that since I have a supposedly pretty capable car, I might as well try it on a track and have some fun.

That’s an interesting perspective, and I think I agree. I really wonder how much of the reduced range of the GT is attributed to the wheels compared to the beefier motors. Those wide-open spokes can’t help.

Motor Trend only got 191 miles during their first test. I briefly thought about asking my dealer about a GT in a moment of insanity a few weeks ago. It would have been a terrible choice…my biggest gripe with the EV6 was charging, and that would have been compounded by the short range. It would have been fun, though! 🏎️
 
Good thread. The EV6 and at its close cousin the Ioniq5 look like a worthwhile EV competitors, although my own impression is that they are not yet at the level of Tesla in the sophistication of their electric drivetrain and their software. But that would not be what would hold me back from considering either Korean car. What actually would hold me back are the repeated stories I have heard about negative experiences of customers with Kia and Hyundai in their interactions with the dealerships in sales and after-sales service, at least here in Canada. Admittedly, those stories are mostly about sales and service of Kia and Hyundai ICE vehicles, and it is hard to know if those experiences are necessarily worse than the experiences that people have with other car companies. But I must say that the negative impression that those stories have created have made me somewhat reluctant about the Kia/Hyundai EV option.
 
What actually would hold me back are the repeated stories I have heard about negative experiences of customers with Kia and Hyundai in their interactions with the dealerships in sales and after-sales service, at least here in Canada.
In the US, Hyundai/Kia/Genesis is one of the best sets of brands above all others with excellent reputations for value, performance, sales, and service. They have consistently had top sellers across multiple categories with very high quality. Having owned several, and several friends and family with them, I would not hesitate. Hyundai/Kia/Genesis is also way ahead of everyone else in EV development. They are a solid #2 behind Tesla with GM a distant 3rd. They are the ones to watch that will put pressure on Tesla in a few years. I‘m particularly interested in the Ioniq 7 coming in this year.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: alexgr
I learned long ago that you can find negativity about anything if you look online. Our brains also like to get lazy and apply a single experience to everything within that category. Someone has a bad experience with their dealer, so they proclaim to the world that they all suck. We see it here on TMC, and you see it on every other internet forum or group that I've ever seen.

I think that reality is a lot more complicated. My experience with Tesla service has been mixed. On my EV6 forum, there were people telling me that I couldn't get the car serviced without waiting months for an appointment, and that the techs wouldn't know what they were doing when the appointment finally came. One of my local dealers had the first appointment 6 weeks out, but the next one I looked at had openings the following week. The appointment took less than 45 minutes, and they were great. I can't assume that they're all like that, but people insisting that every Kia dealer is terrible are wrong. The same applies to Tesla service.

Heck, that same stereotype applies to dealers charging above MSRP. People insisted that every dealer did this, and that it was impossible to find an EV6 at MSRP. Blasphemy. The second dealer that I called was the one I bought from. I got my car at MSRP with no ADM, fees, or required equipment, and they beat the trade value that I was quoted from other shops.

The car business is far too complicated for generalizations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cusetownusa
I learned long ago that you can find negativity about anything if you look online. Our brains also like to get lazy and apply a single experience to everything within that category. Someone has a bad experience with their dealer, so they proclaim to the world that they all suck. We see it here on TMC, and you see it on every other internet forum or group that I've ever seen.

I think that reality is a lot more complicated. My experience with Tesla service has been mixed. On my EV6 forum, there were people telling me that I couldn't get the car serviced without waiting months for an appointment, and that the techs wouldn't know what they were doing when the appointment finally came. One of my local dealers had the first appointment 6 weeks out, but the next one I looked at had openings the following week. The appointment took less than 45 minutes, and they were great. I can't assume that they're all like that, but people insisting that every Kia dealer is terrible are wrong. The same applies to Tesla service.

Heck, that same stereotype applies to dealers charging above MSRP. People insisted that every dealer did this, and that it was impossible to find an EV6 at MSRP. Blasphemy. The second dealer that I called was the one I bought from. I got my car at MSRP with no ADM, fees, or required equipment, and they beat the trade value that I was quoted from other shops.

The car business is far too complicated for generalizations.

My Tesla service experience has been far better than my Kia service experience. Kia though is the worst dealership experience in the business...not surprised.

 
My Tesla service experience has been far better than my Kia service experience. Kia though is the worst dealership experience in the business...not surprised.

It's worst than that. These are the guys that have been making cars w/o immobilizers cuz cost cutting. No one needs another link to a stolen Hyundai with a usb cable?



Why So Many Hyundai and Kia Vehicles Are Getting Recalled for Fire Risk - Consumer Reports <--by CR lmao
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Dennisis and alexgr
I learned long ago that you can find negativity about anything if you look online. Our brains also like to get lazy and apply a single experience to everything within that category. Someone has a bad experience with their dealer, so they proclaim to the world that they all suck. We see it here on TMC, and you see it on every other internet forum or group that I've ever seen.

I think that reality is a lot more complicated. My experience with Tesla service has been mixed. On my EV6 forum, there were people telling me that I couldn't get the car serviced without waiting months for an appointment, and that the techs wouldn't know what they were doing when the appointment finally came. One of my local dealers had the first appointment 6 weeks out, but the next one I looked at had openings the following week. The appointment took less than 45 minutes, and they were great. I can't assume that they're all like that, but people insisting that every Kia dealer is terrible are wrong. The same applies to Tesla service.

Heck, that same stereotype applies to dealers charging above MSRP. People insisted that every dealer did this, and that it was impossible to find an EV6 at MSRP. Blasphemy. The second dealer that I called was the one I bought from. I got my car at MSRP with no ADM, fees, or required equipment, and they beat the trade value that I was quoted from other shops.

The car business is far too complicated for generalizations.

My only problem with Tesla Service is that they don't do their own body work, and Tesla has very few Tesla Authorized body shops. The nearest one to me (and I don't live out in the boonies any more) is an hour and forty five min drive. Combine that with the slow motion parts acquisition system and a body repair takes way longer than it should. I am still waiting on my spoiler to complete my rear hatch replacement.

Keith
 
Can only speak of the body-work situation in Tucson. Needed some touch-up paint done on the side of our MY (leased). Tesla service gave me the names of two places which are certified by Tesla in Tucson. Very happy with the result of the work done at Dan's Paint and Body. Very professional. I was told by Oscar at intake that Tesla is very fussy about the work done on Tesla autos. He went through the car most carefully and pointed out minor issues (which he fixed without additional charge) that ought to be dealt with.

Just another data point.

Rich
 
  • Like
Reactions: TomB985
My AWD EV6 had the slick front axle disconnect that improved high-speed efficiency, but it came at the expense of a noticeable lag as the motor spun up deliver the power that my right foot was requesting. The Y is locked in at all times, and power comes on like a hammer
Good review and summery of the differences and confirmation that software is still a significant Tesla advantage.
Regarding the front axle disconnect feature in the EV6, comparatively the front motor in Tesla dual motor cars is not active at constant velocity, under 50% throttle or until called on for traction in the case of rear wheel slippage to provide maximum efficiency.
 
Good review and summery of the differences and confirmation that software is still a significant Tesla advantage.
Regarding the front axle disconnect feature in the EV6, comparatively the front motor in Tesla dual motor cars is not active at constant velocity, under 50% throttle or until called on for traction in the case of rear wheel slippage to provide maximum efficiency.

I believe that. My understanding is that the efficiency gain is the result of the front motor not being in motion. Similar to how ICE trucks with conventional 4WD systems would use a front axle disconnect system to gain highway fuel economy. Efficiency is gained because the front driveline is stationary whenever the system isn’t engaged, which imparts less frictional loss.

Unpowered electric motors don’t have the same parasitic loss as a heavy ICE powertrain, but it’s still there. The motors in my EV6 would spin about 10,000 RPMs at 75 MPH. It takes energy to move a rotor that fast.