You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here's the referenced blog article with more details:
Engine: [...] set 300hp as the target performance for their car
0-60: 6.5 seconds (which is just a whisper slower than the Karma)
Emissions: 50 C02 (g/km)
Pricing: [...] Estimated Atlantic price range: $50,000-$60,000
Battery Size/Supplier/Range: [...] speculation, thanks to a 10-Q we dug up here at InsideEvs.com is that it will indeed be A123 again, the same supplier to the Karma. As for the range itself, even privately Fisker gave out the stock answer, “varies on use of the all-electric mode.” I am going to chalk this up to them not actually knowing, and the EPA’s rating of the Karma’s range (at 32 miles) catching them off guard after promoting much higher numbers.
Release Date: [...] The plant, which they purchased in July of 2010, is expected to under going re-tooling between 2012 and 2013, with the first prototype anticipated to being completed in mid 2013, with full production anticipated to start mid-2014, and thus making the Atlantic a model year 2015.
The Fisker Atlantic extended-range plug-in vehicle will start production about a year after its previously estimated mid-2013 date, Inside EVs blog reports, citing leaked company documents that were dated "a few weeks ago."
The Atlantic, formerly known as Project Nina, will compete pricewise against the BMW 3 and 5 Series sedans as well as the Mercedes-Benz C-Class and E-Class, Jaguar XF and Audi A4 and A6. That would put the model in the $50,000 to $60,000 range, according to the publication. The model, which will still be produced at Fisker's Delaware plant, will have 300 horsepower, a 0-60 time of 6.5 seconds and emissions of 50 kilograms per kilometer, Inside EVs said, citing the documents.
Battery Size/Supplier/Range: This seems to be one area Fisker hasn’t noted (at least not here). The speculation, thanks to a 10-Q we dug up here at InsideEvs.com is that it will indeed be A123 again, the same supplier to the Karma.
As for the range itself, even privately Fisker gave out the stock answer, “varies on use of the all-electric mode.” I am going to chalk this up to them not actually knowing, and the EPA’s rating of the Karma’s range (at 32 miles) catching them off guard after promoting much higher numbers.
So far so good right? Sure, the car is a little more money than initial estimates, but aren’t they always? The main thing is that the car’s performance matches its aggressive appearance.
... 0-60 [6.5 sec] not bad (especially compared to the Karma)...
Really? To compete with " pricewise against the BMW 3 and 5 Series sedans as well as the Mercedes-Benz C-Class and E-Class, Jaguar XF and Audi A4 and A6."
And what about Tesla's Blue Gen? Do you think for even a moment that Elon and JB would put out something that would not at minimum beat a 4.9 sec 1-60 mark?
... I could do with more stylish designs (to me anyway), but I would never forego the latter 2 in exchange for it (which I'd be doing with a Karma or Atlantic it seems).
Speaking of which, the Atlantic in 2014, The Blue Gen in 2016? Both are aiming at the exact same market.
Fair point, though I think some of it has to do with Franz's own style....).
Tesla Gen III is priced in the $30,000s; Atlantic in the $50,000s. They are not competing in the same space. An extra $20k is a big step up. ...
Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiaturIt's no secret though that I think the Karma is all show and no go, and while the Atlantic seems to be quicker, it's shaping up to be the same. Fisker seems to be OK with that, as does their buyers.
Speaking of which, the Atlantic in 2014, The Blue Gen in 2016? Both are aiming at the exact same market.
Welcome Jay. That overlap will become more apparent as battery range increases. Eventually, the luxury/green hybrid segment will begin to seriously look at BEVs.I think they both have their own niche. Tesla being uber-range/performance BEVS, and Fisker in the premium luxury/green hybrid segment. I'm not sure there is a ton of overlap, or at least not so much that they threaten each other...they have a lot more to worry about besides.
...
As for fancy, future tense models. Tesla has the Bluestar, but I can tell you Fisker has designs on a third model of their own. With that said, I believe the fate of both these imagined cars lie largely in how these company's second offerings go, and how they manage being 'real', volume auto manufacturers.
PS
Fisker does a great job at naming cars! Tesla, not so much.