Too funny! Is that why every auto journalist to ever drive the AWD Model 3 has raved about its superior driving dynamics? And I bet that's why it performed so well for me climbing steep roads covered in snow and ice. The AWD handles snow and ice covered roads like a bat outta hell! I guess it's "disappointing" in the same way the BMW M5 is "disappointing".
EXCLUSIVE: BMW Wants Rear-Biased AWD For Next-Gen M5
"We were told any all-wheel-drive system on the next M5 would have to “deliver the feel and performance like a rear-wheel drive system but with additional traction support.” If that can be achieved “then BMW will consider it for implementation.” This seems to corroborate what the Aussie product specialist told GoAuto regarding the 20:80 torque split, a massive bias towards the rear wheels."
If you have an AWD Volvo, you need to pay thousands of dollars extra to get the rear-bias software upgrade installed! That's right, it's not a free Over-the-Air update, you have to pony up some real money to get rear wheel bias:
Polestar AWD optimisation is going to make Volvos even more fun to drive - AutoBuzz.my
"There is a Polestar tuning package for almost every Volvo vehicle out there that offers sharper throttle response, quicker gear changes and increased engine output. Now, Volvo Cars have just introduced a new Polestar-developed software upgrade that promises a more dynamic driving experience on all-wheel drive (AWD) Volvos.
The optimization software increases the amount and frequency of torque being sent to the rear wheels giving the car sharper turn-ins, better control and engagement in a corner and improved traction when pulling away. All these give the driver a more dynamic and engaging driving experience."
Sounds real "disappointing"!
Next thing you know, mswlogo will claim it's real disappointing that Tesla increased the peak HP of all Model 3's with a software update. The real "disappointing" part is that you can't even pay for it, it's loaded on your car free of charge! How disappointing.