Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

GM Chevy Volt

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Volt based minivan coming?
Chevy-Volt-MPV5-Exterior-02 Photo, image of Chevy-Volt-MPV5-Exterior-02 on December 22, 2010 #11103 from Rumor Central
Chevy-Volt-MPV5-Exterior-02.jpg

Chevy_Volt_MPV5-1024x682.jpg

Chevy Volt MPV5 is a Winner | Honk Blog
 
The Chevrolet Volt is attracting new faces in the face of persistent critics

GM reports customers searching online for fuel-efficient transportation often begin looking at the Volt, then cross-shop the Cruze.

“Since April, nearly 200,000 visitors searching for information on the Chevrolet Volt also searched for information on the Cruze,” GM said.

In fact, Web traffic data from both Chevy.com and Edmunds.com show the Cruze is the most cross-shopped vehicle to the Volt, GM said, adding the Cruze has been the number-one selling compact in the U.S. for the past couple of months.

Nor are some Chevy dealers altogether unhappy about this. We at GM-Volt have been personally told by a Chevy dealer the Volt was overpriced, as he attempted to switch us to the Cruze. We have heard several similar reports besides.

Perhaps GM’s disclosure is an attempt also at “transparency” on Chevrolet’s behalf, as the company openly says the Volt is still a magnet leading to the Cruze.
“As far as image goes … the Volt is huge because it’s also helping sell the Cruze,” said Inder Dosanjh, a Chevrolet dealer in Dublin, Calif. who was quoted by Chevrolet in the same press release.

Coming from gm-volt.com ...
 
Yeah, there are two Voltec EVSEs right in front of the GM advanced tech research center (next to Fry's electronics).
They are clearly marked for GM use only.
Also, those Voltecs might only be 16A.

ae52091abbe983447afd00a2ac5dee9e.png

5657167688_9deff37e5e_m.jpg


If you are in that area, there are a couple of 'public' ChargePoints at the CreekSide Inn a couple of blocks away.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, there are two Voltec EVSEs right in front of the GM advanced tech research center (next to Fry's electronics).
They are clearly marked for GM use only.
Also, those Voltecs might only be 16A.
If you are in that area, there are a couple of 'public' ChargePoints at the CreekSide Inn a couple of blocks away.

Ours are not exclusively marked (yet) and are hidden from view. We have no public J options in the area for nearly 50 miles that I know of.
 
Over here:
Public EVSE Charging Stations, Retrofitting, and Who is Responsible?
DonC wrote:
DonC said:
...Here is why you need one charger per spot and why sharing chargers isn't desirable. First, for security purposes, if you unplug the Volt it sets off the security alarm and I get sent an email alert...
Now the reason the Volt doesn't like being unplugged, is that, unlike your Leaf, the Volt doesn't charge and then shut down. It has a thermal management system that constantly uses plug in power to keep the battery at the desired temperature and/or to precondition the car. That's why your Leaf essentially goes dead after a charge but the Volt shows a blinking green light -- it's blinking because it may still be using grid power even after the battery has been charged. This leads to the second reason why I don't want you to pull the plug on my Volt: on a day like today you'd be degrading my battery...

As people compare the efficiency of gas use compared to MPGe of different vehicles, how does this factor in?
If you leave a Volt plugged in for a long time with it "constantly conditioning the battery" how much extra energy was used for maintenance?
If a gas car's tank is fully sealed and doesn't leak, then it shouldn't lose MPG just sitting there, but I gather a Volt's MPGe goes down from being parked and left on charge. The car readouts probably only track based on miles driven versus energy pulled from the pack, not energy used at the wall to control temperature of the pack. Perhaps someday the "wall to wheel" efficiency needs to take into account the average power used by a particular vehicle when it is just left plugged in for long periods of time.
 
Further reading suggest that the Volt may actually self drain the battery when the car isn't driven for a while to help make the pack last longer.
(Storing at 50% SOC is better than 100% particularly if it is hot.)
A Leaf doesn't do that as you have no "fallback plan" when your battery runs out, but a Volt engineer can decide "we would rather have you burn some extra gas to help the battery pack last longer since we have a long battery warantee to consider."

Public EVSE Charging Stations, Retrofitting, and Who is Responsible?
 
...
A Leaf doesn't do that as you have no "fallback plan" when your battery runs out, but a Volt engineer can decide "we would rather have you burn some extra gas to help the battery pack last longer since we have a long battery warantee to consider."...

Those proud Volt owners that are doing 99 percent of their driving in full electric mode are doing more damage to their battery than a Leaf or Roadster owner.
Haven't heard it for a while but one of the downsides to the Volt hybrid is that the battery gets fully charged and discharged many more times than a larger range full electric traveling the same amount of all electric miles per year.

The Volt's battery management system when not charging may be trying to coddle that battery like the Roadster does but the owner above really needs it much more for sustained battery life.
 
Full cycle case:

Roadster 100K miles @ 240 miles per charge = 416 cycles
Volt 100K miles @ 40 miles per charge = 2500 cycles

And a typical Li-ion cycle life chart tends to be in a few thousands I think.
So, yeah, they are probably hoping most people don't do 100% EV driving in their Volt.

And if a typical daily drive is 40 miles, and people charge every night, the Roadster owner only does a small 16% daily DoD compared to 100% for the Volt. Night and day.
(Yeah, I know, particular battery chemistry is a big factor too, but still...)

Lithium Cobalt:
High-Power Cobalt-Based Lithium-ion Battery - Battery University
partone-5a5.jpg
 
Last edited:
Those proud Volt owners that are doing 99 percent of their driving in full electric mode are doing more damage to their battery than a Leaf or Roadster owner.
Haven't heard it for a while but one of the downsides to the Volt hybrid is that the battery gets fully charged and discharged many more times than a larger range full electric traveling the same amount of all electric miles per year.

The Volt's battery management system when not charging may be trying to coddle that battery like the Roadster does but the owner above really needs it much more for sustained battery life.

I've read that the chevy volt's battery only charges to 80-90% and never goes below 30% of total battery capacity (16kwH, it uses 10-11kwH for driving).The Volt's battery will stay in that sweet spot while the unconditioned LEAF will have range swing wildly with temperature and degrade quicker. The Volt's battery is thermal conditioned just like the roadster. I will track down the facts in a bit.
 
Those proud Volt owners that are doing 99 percent of their driving in full electric mode are doing more damage to their battery than a Leaf or Roadster owner.

Yes they are. PHEV duty cycles have got to be the hardest on battery life. The Volt compensates by only using 65% of the rated capacity, which helps cycle life. Active thermal management, like the Roadster (maybe even better than the Roadster in cold climates), helps also.

If you think about it, the Volt drivers that seldom use gas, are arriving home with some EV miles left, and are not using the full 65% capacity. The volt drivers that use Gas everyday are putting a "full" cycle on the pack. Someone driving 80 mi to work, charging during the day, then driving 80 mi home would be the toughest case, not the 99% EV driver.

GSP
 
If the info I saw is correct, and the Volt "self-drains" the pack to ~50%SOC when not driven for a while, one would hope that they could use V2G to give the power back the grid when plugged in. Unfortunately, I would bet (at least for now) they just "burn off" the power in an effort to keep the pack in storage charge range. Does anyone know how they do this? Run the A/C and Heat while unattended until the pack is at a lower SOC?
Some of this Volt behavior seems to be (at least in part) behind why GM was so keen to make sure Volts can be left plugged in for long periods at airports and such. I gather that someone could remotely command the Volt to adjust pack SOC and cabin climate just before they get back to their car if it is left plugged in.
I wonder if voltage self-drained and then added back later is factored into the MPGe numbers?