Garlan Garner
Banned
What?I have, which is why I and some others got a chuckle out of your conflicting positions.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What?I have, which is why I and some others got a chuckle out of your conflicting positions.
Concerning Superchargers.......yes.I thought that that was destination chargers. You're saying that Tesla doesn't pay anything for the electricity at all of the SCs?
You must also think that it's ok to pirate movies since it's only a copy?
I have, which is why I and some others got a chuckle out of your conflicting positions.
What conflict? Hello?I have, which is why I and some others got a chuckle out of your conflicting positions.
Nope....The engineers are done. Tesla has paid the engineers handsomely I'm sure. I'm almost positive that the engineers don't get paid "per car".
The software is owned by Tesla. Tesla can do whatever they want. I'm a software engineer myself. My company owns the software. They can give it away or throw it on the shelf and never use what I wrote. I'm a non factor in the sales department.
My comment is: They can duplicate the software I wrote all they want and give it away. I make no more money nor do they take any money from me. There is no loss on the books of my company if they give my software away. Much of the software I've written has been MD'd anyway.
Anyone want a copy of Windows 3.1? I'm sure Microsoft won't lose a penny off of a copy of it.
What?
What conflict? Hello?
Yeah....like free supercharging for Model S and X owners and NOT for Model 3 owners.Impatient?
That something of value should be free in one instance, but not in another.
Giving away software costs nothing more than the time to duplicate it. Especially to people who wouldn't have bought it anyway.
Tesla is a perfect example of what I'm talking about.Difference Between Economic and Accounting Profit
Garlan, you start off so far from the end it can't be explained in a few sentences on a forum. Businesses aren't out to make accounting profits, though that is what they report. They are out to make economic profits.
And I still say the mentioned awards/gifts wont hurt Teslas profits. My argument is ( and forever has been )that neither duplicating software nor free supercharging nor a paint other than black will hurt Teslas profits. For goodness sake - they haven't made any profits. I believe the reason the stock went up after this last earnings call is because Tesla didn't lose as much money as predicted.Garlan, you've been the one stating it won't hurt their profits, not me. If it isn't about profit, why would you make that part of your argument?
Elon bobblehead in 3... 2... 1...
Concerning Superchargers.......yes.
Tesla is increasingly able to make businesses pay for the electricity delivered by its Superchargers
Don't you guys remember this article? I've been following this.
Walmart made an interesting comment. - "We would love to install superchargers at our stores at a rate of 100 per store, however the clientele of Tesla owners isn't our focused target group".
I believe we all know what that means. Rich people don't shop at Walmart enough for this endeavor. Just maybe the Model 3 will change things in more ways than what its intended to. LOL
Concerning Superchargers.......yes.
Tesla is increasingly able to make businesses pay for the electricity delivered by its Superchargers
Don't you guys remember this article? I've been following this.
Walmart made an interesting comment. - "We would love to install superchargers at our stores at a rate of 100 per store, however the clientele of Tesla owners isn't our foc
I thought that that was destination chargers. You're saying that Tesla doesn't pay anything for the electricity at all of the SCs?
You must also think that it's ok to pirate movies since it's only a copy?
That would be Hilarious.All I want is an easter egg of Elon thanking us first day folks for trusting in his company. Optionally, it should play every time the car turns on.
Of course the developers don't get paid by the car, but they do get paid. The only way Tesla has of recouping that payment is by charging for the software that was developed. Tesla has determined that that cost will be $5,000, they feel that that is enough to recoup what they paid for initial development, ongoing troubleshooting, and future enhancements (which the customer will not be charged for). Sure they can copy it as many times as they want to for little cost but it isn't the cost of the copying that they need to cover.Nope....The engineers are done. Tesla has paid the engineers handsomely I'm sure. I'm almost positive that the engineers don't get paid "per car".
The software is owned by Tesla. Tesla can do whatever they want. I'm a software engineer myself. My company owns the software. They can give it away or throw it on the shelf and never use what I wrote. I'm a non factor in the sales department.
My comment is: They can duplicate the software I wrote all they want and give it away. I make no more money nor do they take any money from me. There is no loss on the books of my company if they give my software away. Much of the software I've written has been MD'd anyway.