Wow, I guess I should have just accelerated hard, obviously I am "Hysterical." Typical caustic, blaming KS attitude.
Tesla needs improvement here, human input controls should override the computer functions. Even if the computer thinks its a bad input.
It does, and you can. The car will quite happily let you drive into a wall, or the back of a car if you so desire.
It will try to avoid you accidentally doing that, but if you really insist, it will do so.
I am a bit disappointed in the responses, but shouldn't be surprised as I have seen this same response to many other users here who bring an issue they feel strongly about. They get shut down, told they are doing it wrong, they need to read the manual etc.
The car is a machine, everyone who uses the machine, needs to understand, to varying degrees how the machine will react. Different people have different needs and different amounts of knowledge, and motivations to understand different amounts.
The car is a General Purpose machine, which needs to cater for a wide variety of users. It has customization and controls to make it suitable for different different people, BUT it isn't a 'full custom' design, specifically for you.
So you need to learn the controls of the machine to make the machine behave how you want it to, AND adapt what you want to what the machine can do.
I want the human inputs to override the computer, that's it. This is reasonable. There is no reason why the program should second guess me when I gently press the accelerator during an AEB event. This programming is unsafe. Saying something like "Well if your foot is hovering..." is just a poor excuse.
AND IT WILL, you just need to learn how to manipulate the controls to make it do what you want.
AND PRACTICE, so that you can do that, quickly, when you need to, without having to think to hard.
If you don't do that, then, that puts you in the bucket with the rest of the people that the car is trying to protect from their mistakes, and quite rightly so.