So...446 is less than 6.. ...nah, never mind.
MSG: BMS_energyBuffer
MSG: BMS_energyToChargeComplete
MSG: BMS_expectedEnergyRemaining
MSG: BMS_idealEnergyRemaining
MSG: BMS_kwhChargeTotal
MSG: BMS_kwhDischargeTotal
MSG: BMS_maxDischargePower
MSG: BMS_maxRegenPower
MSG: BMS_nominalEnergyRemaining
MSG: BMS_nominalFullPackEnergy
MSG: BMS_odometer
MSG: BMS_packCurrent
MSG: BMS_packPower
MSG: BMS_packVoltage
MSG: BMS_socMin
MSG: BMS_socUI
MSG: DCDC_inletTemperature
MSG: DCDC_inputPower
MSG: DCDC_outputCurrent
MSG: DCDC_outputPower
MSG: DCDC_outputVoltage
MSG: DIS_aps12V
MSG: DIS_dissipation
MSG: DIS_drivePowerMax
MSG: DIS_mechPower
MSG: DIS_statorCurrent
MSG: DIS_torqueEstimate
MSG: DIS_torqueEstimate_ftlb
MSG: DI_analogSpeed
MSG: DI_aps12V
MSG: DI_brakePedal
MSG: DI_brakePedalState
MSG: DI_dissipation
MSG: DI_drivePowerMax
MSG: DI_epbInterfaceReady
MSG: DI_epbParkRequest
MSG: DI_gear
MSG: DI_gearHuman
MSG: DI_gearRequest
MSG: DI_gearRequestHuman
MSG: DI_mechPower
MSG: DI_motorRPM
MSG: DI_pedalPos
MSG: DI_regenPowerMax
MSG: DI_statorCurrent
MSG: DI_torqueEstimate
MSG: DI_torqueEstimate_ftlb
MSG: DI_torqueInterfaceFailure
MSG: DI_vehicleSpeed
MSG: PMS_torqueMeasured
MSG: PMS_torqueMeasured_ftlb
MSG: PM_pedalPosA
MSG: PM_pedalPosB
MSG: PM_torqueMeasured
MSG: PM_torqueMeasured_ftlb
This is very good thing! Means they are not charging the cells to 100%!!! At 4.15, thats only about 93-95% of "full" since 4.2 is considered "Full". So Charging to 100% on the car really doesn't stress the cells anywhere near what I was thinking. And even then, my own experience with my packs mirrors the above. Almost no degradation even with the tons of miles I put on.
No, you need the ratio between full and empty. Empty is somewhere between 3 and 3.2V IIRC - so 0.05V is indeed about 5% of the potential capacity.
Reasonably established as well as already published by Tesla. However, if you could read that out form the CAN messages, that means Tesla knew all along and not realized some time down the line that they couldn't reach this number (there is no way a sane person would think they could squeeze out another 50% power from somewhere). So, when JB Straubel posted his Tesla All Wheel Drive (Dual Motor) Power and Torque Specifications | Tesla Motors he also could have simply come out and stated the max power but chose instead to continue to snow people with a "chemical reactions happen, electrons flow - it's complicated" argument rather than an honest "691 will never be seen unless you strap on a couple of spaceX boosters". If on the other hand JB did not see max power numbers by Sept 21 2015 (when he posted his update), that would make him one astronaut CTO - completely disconnected from earth, floating in orbit somewhere, a Donald Trump of EV's.
My guess is T/C
