I can add Sunworks to that list. i did have luck with the field guys and got my inverter located inside my garage instead of outside on a dark South facing wall. My point to h2ofun was the installers have to interface with the authority having jurisdiction and I have run enough construction projects to know the value of a contractor's means and methods. It can be a fruitful collaboration.
Sunrun has a policy where customers are
never allowed to talk to the designers or engineers. They say it requires a lot of training to do their job, and talking to customers just messes them up. But this stubborn "customer is an idiot" mentality stays around even if the customer identifies an issue where the data collected about the home is patently false once someone looks at the house. So Sunrun would rather turn out a botched design over and over and over and over instead of taking the 15 minutes to get their data right.
I can't imagine Tesla being any better; they plug magic into some generic AI and people just kind of have to live with it. This means extreme set backs from skylights; gaps away from eaves even if they aren't the roof access for fire safety, and other completely dum-dum things to make things easy for the installer to get past inspection.
This totally sucks if you're a customer since the designer's prime directive seems to do the least amount of work possible to achieve a barely working system. Good, smaller shops may actually employ people who have the time and care to do things correctly. You need someone who empathizes with the homeowner to design something that the homeowner would be happy with as well as being fully functional.
For the mega-corps, if there's a form a customer needs to submit to get an
AHJ to back off; they might not do it. If there's a need to push an
interpretation of code with an AHJ, the corporates won't take the time.
Nevada County doesn't say anything about a lockable blade disconnect on the AC or DC side of an inverter. So by the strict interpretation of their own rules, OCPD disconnects that de-energize the DC panels should be fine as long as they're documented on the build plan / permit diagram. But now it'll be up to h2ofun to get a hold of an inspector at his local office and push the agenda that OCPDs are valid disconnects under published rules around worker safety in his county.
https://www.mynevadacounty.com/Docu.../Residential-Solar-PV-Submittal-Checklist-PDF
It's now the customer's job to do the legwork to request his county to produce documentation or an interpretation of existing documentation indicating why so many lockable blade disconnects are required instead of OCPDs.
Tesla has published data that discusses the topic around disconnects (link is below ... provided by azmag.gov). Basically Tesla says the onboard switch on the Powerwall itself is a "activation" switch. In the event an AHJ requires a disconnect that is more than 5 feet away or on the other side of the wall as the Powerwall, an OCPD (not a huge ugly ass switch) is code compliant as long as it is labeled and accessible.
http://azmag.gov/Portals/0/Documents/MagContent/Tesla_Powerwall 2_AC_AHJ_Documentation 1_3.pdf?ver=2018-02-22-161120-593
This is why pairing indoor mounted Powerwalls with an outdoor mounted Gateway 2 (with the labels it needs and OCPDs easily available for Powerwall shutdown) is supposed to be allowed.
I ran into an issue in Contra Costa because their inspectors believe the Powerwall's on-board switches were too tiny and hard to see by a worker even if a bright red sticker were put on the Powerwall unit. I guess they took their own interpretation of 706.7 (2017) that a disconnecting means cannot be smaller than an OCPD. They would have been fine with OCPDs as disconnecting means, but Sunrun decided to put blade disconnects because why the hell not.
I think h2ofun should be able to get this done in Nevada County without blade disconnects. It just might not be worth his own headache to pull this off.