You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't have a smoke detector in my garage. I suppose I'm behind the times.
Since mid after noon, the BBC has confirmed the Fire Service statement that the fire started in a diesel vehicle.
Why is there this visceral dislike and need to vilify EVs?
I'd like to blame it on the significant proportion of morons that comprise the population of just about every developed country but, I hear this nonsense sprouted by people who, one would think, should know better....
...then again, look at our politicians.
Of course the mire of falsehoods and lunatic beliefs into which the world is slipping, is not confined to comments about EVs..... if only it was.
I’m sure it’s been tested and great idea if it works, but I wouldn’t have thought there were many voids in a Tesla battery to take a significant amount of water.
Just don't share the garage with a Range Rover.I don't have a smoke detector in my garage. I suppose I'm behind the times.
Of course it is quite possible the car park could have collapsed with just ICE vehicles we will never know. As I have mentioned ICE burn at up to 1000 degrees and steel loses 50% of its strength at only 500 degrees so who knows.The working rationale, at least as I see it, is
- ICE started the fire, a diesel Land Rover
- the presence of EVs altered the fire brigade response because of the way they burn
- EVs also burn at a much hotter temperature which can cause buildings to collapse, which is what seems to have happened
The thing that’s conflated is the original cause of the fire, and what’s turned it into the massive inferno.
It may be we end up not parking EVs next to ICE just as you don’t put a naked flame next to a combustible material, EVs appear less likely to spontaneously catch fire, but if they’re effectively set on fire, they can burn more ferociously.
And I think in essence, that’s the story.
So then, Elon's team need to be looking at fire retardant/ suppression systems ( as indeed should carpark operators).The working rationale, at least as I see it, is
- ICE started the fire, a diesel Land Rover
- the presence of EVs altered the fire brigade response because of the way they burn
- EVs also burn at a much hotter temperature which can cause buildings to collapse, which is what seems to have happened
The thing that’s conflated is the original cause of the fire, and what’s turned it into the massive inferno.
It may be we end up not parking EVs next to ICE just as you don’t put a naked flame next to a combustible material, EVs appear less likely to spontaneously catch fire, but if they’re effectively set on fire, they can burn more ferociously.
And I think in essence, that’s the story.
Fire detection is great but fire prevention....
Of course it is quite possible the car park could have collapsed with just ICE vehicles we will never know. As I have mentioned ICE burn at up to 1000 degrees and steel loses 50% of its strength at only 500 degrees so who knows.
The last thing I want in the event of a fire is more active circuits…it is also connected to the lighting system, and triggers all lights in the house come on to assist half-asleep, dazed, occupants fleeing the building.
I know this car park looks relatively new
The last thing I want in the event of a fire is more active circuits…
Yes. From this video --> It looks very likley that the next cars to catch fire were diesel or petrol.The working rationale, at least as I see it, is
- ICE started the fire, a diesel Land Rover
Its been discussed earlier in the thread..Yes. From this video --> It looks very likley that the next few cars to catch fire were diesel or petrol.
Maybe.
BEVs and PHEVs make up about 3% of the cars on the road in the UK. It is a reasonable assumption that most of the cars in the car park had a fuel tank.
- “Running fuel fires due to failure of plastic fuel tanks in early stages of vehicle fires can be expected. It is estimated 85% of European vehicles are thought to have plastic fuel tanks.” (BRE Fire Spread in Car Parks BD2552 p.12).
When this is investigated, I expect they will find that melting fuel tanks contributed to the spread of the fire. At Liverpool, fuel ran down the ramps and the drainage system.
That is a considerable leap. We've seen buildings collapse from fuel fires before. I'm not aware of any colapses caused by EV fires. Happy to be corrected if you have a source.
okay . . .
Looking forward to the first full-EV RRJust spotted in promoted section of a website, But of a turn up for the books although I suspect the 85 dislikes were people still thinking it was an EV.
View attachment 981569
Full article.
Luton airport inferno comes five years after Liverpool Land Rover fire
The blaze at Luton airport yesterday also comes six months after Land Rover recalled several models of the Range Rover and Range Rover Sport to address issues that could potentially lead to fires.www.dailymail.co.uk
And judging by comments, its not just EV's that Daily Fail readers have issues with!
View attachment 981571
Ah but that is also an anti EV argument. According to the Daily Mail EV's weigh twice as much as ICE cars /sAnd many car parks were not designed when the overweight vehicles that we have these days were common. Add that to cars being packed in tight. There are some hidden benefits of extra wide spaces.
I know this car park looks relatively new, but it’s going to depend on what weight loadings they used to determine structural specifications.
At the temperatures of car fires, even non EVs, Steel loses almost all of its strength. so it would be like trying to make a structure that you wanted to resist water out of cardboard.