-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Mobileye will launch a self-driving taxi service in Israel in 2019
- Thread starter Bladerskb
- Start date
strangecosmos
Non-Member
Mobileye has a separate partnership with BMW, so I think this Volkswagen collaboration is just one of the projects it’s working on. That makes more sense. Hopefully Mobileye will be scaling to at least tens of thousands of vehicles globally by 2022.
So eyeq5 adds a central vision processor and finally adds hardware security ? I guess it means you can Frankenstein multiple eyeq4 have higher tdp and we'll hopefully hardware security is not important..
The difference IS the open system i referred to, vision central computer = eyeq4 software. open software platform is the only new thing. With an open platform comes the need for hardware security.
Something that has not been completely clear to me regarding Intel/Mobileye eyeq series has been what sort of interface they provide.
Would it be correct to say than from eyeq1-4 it was a blackbox for the oem in a sense?
In other words what is the typical api that the eyeq4 chip provides?
Is it a list of lane line positions, pedestrian pixel/coordinates, and a few other simple values?
Is it more elaborate than this?
For example, do I feed the eyeq chip data from the radar??
Ie. How does GM uses the same chip as few other automakers on their cars (nissan, lexus, toyota?) and they have different capabilities?
Is that something that GM coded by reading the data from the eyeq chips?
Do you have no choice but to pay extra to mobileye to provide extra features??
No, the open vs closed is not the only new thing - they clearly expect a continuing evolution in functionality in terms of levels of autonomy (4-5 from 3) and in terms of driver interaction (Mind Off vs Eyes Off).
What documents are you reading?
Feel free to provide EVIDENCE from Mobileye which contradicts this:
Latest news is (as of today) from May 2018: Mobileye In The News - Mobileye
Which is a kind of Mad Max demo around Jerusalem: A lap of Jerusalem in Intel's surprisingly aggressive self-driving car
together with speculation/promise of future work.
Which is a kind of Mad Max demo around Jerusalem: A lap of Jerusalem in Intel's surprisingly aggressive self-driving car
together with speculation/promise of future work.
Mad max? Please dont compare mobileye system to that wack sh*t.
No that is simply marketing. A eyeq3 can be used for L3 sdc for example. Proven by the Audi A8 using a eyeq3. Just as eyeq4 can be used for level 4 and 5 sdc proven by the fact several companies today are using it for their level4 and 5 systems.
Aptiv (Delphi) uses eyeq4.
Notice that there is no actual new feature or listed feature improvements listed under eyeq5.
Last edited:
Nissan systems uses mobileye eyeq4 chips.
They said it wont be a prototype fleet and cars have massive servers because it's easier to debug each individual systems that way during development. Nevertheless the car will use 4x eyeq4.
Lastly google cars struggle to merge during dense traffic because of how conservative they are programmed. Mobileye driving policy handles this flawlessly in a more aggressive Isreal.
Now is waymo more validated than mobileye driving policy? Ofcourse. But for how long though? Because what mobileye is gunning for is a system they can drop anywhere in the world and all you need to do is adjust a few preferences and bam, its fully self driving. Waymo? Not so much.
They plan to expand to other cities and sell the AV kit to other companies. This partnership is quite different from the bmw, aptiv or Nissan. Because its fully mobileye written software end to end.
Their plan is to get it self driving in isreal and then drop it anywhere in the world and have it work there too. That would be a true av kit system and they are making it happen because of REM mapping in prod uploading map data today.
Last edited:
I think it's just as exciting or more exciting than Waymo because it can demonstrate that the technology isn't limited to fleet vehicles.
Sure it's a taxi/fleet type thing, but it's just to demonstrate it. The important thing is Intel/Mobile eye is a solution provider unlike WayMo/Cruise which might force the technology to only being for fleet cars.
As someone who wants self-driving in a car I own I say this is exciting news.
The only thing not very exciting is it's in Israel so I can't exactly try it out. Can't wait for a self-driving taxi service to arrive in Seattle.
I don't think we want the autonomous section of this website to exclude anything/anyone that's related to autonomous driving. MobileEye is absolutely one of the most important companies when it comes to self-driving cars. There is a reason Intel bought it for 15 billion dollars.
Sure it's a taxi/fleet type thing, but it's just to demonstrate it. The important thing is Intel/Mobile eye is a solution provider unlike WayMo/Cruise which might force the technology to only being for fleet cars.
As someone who wants self-driving in a car I own I say this is exciting news.
The only thing not very exciting is it's in Israel so I can't exactly try it out. Can't wait for a self-driving taxi service to arrive in Seattle.
I don't think we want the autonomous section of this website to exclude anything/anyone that's related to autonomous driving. MobileEye is absolutely one of the most important companies when it comes to self-driving cars. There is a reason Intel bought it for 15 billion dollars.
Something that deeply confuses me regarding mobileye.
Their car ran a red light.
They claimed it was due to the camera transmitter causing interference with the street/signal RF system.
Is their advance driving policy reliant on having working RF transmitters on street lights?
WTF?
Their car ran a red light.
They claimed it was due to the camera transmitter causing interference with the street/signal RF system.
Is their advance driving policy reliant on having working RF transmitters on street lights?
WTF?
Several companies? Level 4 and 5 is here already? Uh huh.
Care to link to the evidence that proves these systems are up and running?
No rush. Take your time.
Nice! My main motivation for buying a Tesla was the Autopilot. I make 95% of my daily commute on Autopilot.
I want that level 4 or 5 you talk about, and I would be willing to change my Tesla for an alternative with this superior level of autonomy.
Could you tell me which brand / model should I buy now, today, on 2018 for that level 4/5? Please note that I live on a small town near Madrid (Spain/Europe). Half of my daily commute are on secondary roads, where we have just one lane on each direction and the paintings are not very clear (although Autopilot interprets and drives them as good as I do).
Please, no demos, videos, dreams nor future availability, for that we already have the 2016 Tesla FSD demo which at this point we all agree it's just bullshit.
lunitiks
Cool James & Black Teacher
Mobileye - Generating Augmented Corner-Case Lane Markings for NN training
Detecting lanes and road markings are some of the great challenges autonomous driving technologies face today. In Mobileye, we do it by training neural networks. This method requires an enormous amount of data from many countries, different weather conditions etc. However, in some road scenarios the available data set is still too small, or the data is not accurate. In this session, I will discuss how we developed a system that uses Python with OpenCV to generate augmented images and matching ground truth data in order to improve accuracy of neural networks.
Detecting lanes and road markings are some of the great challenges autonomous driving technologies face today. In Mobileye, we do it by training neural networks. This method requires an enormous amount of data from many countries, different weather conditions etc. However, in some road scenarios the available data set is still too small, or the data is not accurate. In this session, I will discuss how we developed a system that uses Python with OpenCV to generate augmented images and matching ground truth data in order to improve accuracy of neural networks.
Last edited:
you mean using simulator generated images? it also has the problem of looking the same. the real world however never looks the same.
Even in the mobileye presentation lines are not very realistic (other than perspective corrected and blended).
Also, I do not see how texture or scenery would or should matter to an autonomous system therefore road with all the markings could be fully computer generated.
Also, I do not see how texture or scenery would or should matter to an autonomous system therefore road with all the markings could be fully computer generated.
Similar threads
- Article
