As we all know, when people have issues they yell the loudest. That does not make it a scientific survey - far from it.
Not only do people with problems yell the loudest, but forums like this are also guilty of amplifying issues in two primary ways:
1) People with an issue are far more likely to go to a forum than the multitudes without the issue.
2) These forums have literally thousands of low post count aliases who are fake Tesla owners. Sure, the forum owners try to delete fake accounts but they have to identify them first which can be a daunting task. These aliases are created by troll farms whose goal is to dissuade Tesla purchases by curious potential Tesla buyers who are browsing the forums prior to purchase. Because privacy is such a big deal these days, it's very difficult to very that people are who they say they are. Also, there may not be much incentive to delete suspect accounts when more accounts equal more advertising revenue.
As I type this, I am looking at a Toyota ad to win a
free "Western Washington ROAD TRIP". I live in Western Washington. The right side of the ad says "
Click to get a free trade-in value now!". This ad tells me a number of things;
A) Toyota knows they compete with Tesla for purchasers of new vehicles and they are targeting people specifically interested in a new Tesla. This makes sense because Toyota is popular with buyers looking for reliable vehicles with low servicing costs.
B) Toyota targets its advertising dollars in a sophisticated manner, customizing the ad to be most effective for each state of the country.
C) Toyota finds it useful to spend considerable money advertising dollars on a Tesla forum because they know people visit Tesla forums before they purchase a Tesla.
D) Advertising on a Tesla forum works and is worth the money they spend on it (or they wouldn't bother).
I hope the owners of this site don't take offense at me for pointing out what should be plainly obvious or think I'm criticizing them for taking money from Toyota, a company trying to prevent you from buying a Tesla, because I recognize it costs real time and money to run a site like this and that money needs to come from somewhere. I certainly don't expect it to come from the pockets of the site owners out of the goodness of their hearts.
Rather, my point is, Toyota, and other companies, know that people visit auto forums before deciding who to give their money to. It doesn't take many negative stories to create a negative impression in the minds of unsophisticated buyers of a brand. That is all it takes to convert a Tesla sale into a Toyota sale (for example). Giving a potential new car buyer a negative feeling about a competitor is more valuable than all the positive advertising money can buy. Because that consumer is going to buy a car, it's just a matter of which car it's going to support.
Talk of EV's running on coal, batteries requiring toxic mining, Tesla's being shoddily built or having a short lifespan all play into the hands of traditional automakers, suppliers for traditional automakers, dealerships of traditional automakers and those with a stake in the continuing demand for oil and gas. These competing interests recognize this fact and don't stop at the little ad banners you see at the top and bottom of every page. These competing interests would have to be more principled than they are to stay out of the body of the forums because negative advertising is even more effective than positive advertising. This is how real issues that are not endemic to the Model 3 are amplified to make them appear endemic. You can identify who these people are because they will often try to transfer the faults of early Model S Tesla's to Model 3, a car that is a new clean-sheet design that shares almost nothing with the Model S. In fact, Tesla is now upgrading the Model S and X with technology originally deployed in the Model 3.