This is precisely my point.
Long ago, people stopped buying station wagons because of the negative connotations; no one wants to drive the dorky car their dad drove. Folks moved to minivans. Then people stopped buying them because no one wanted to drive a mommymobile. Someday, young people will not want to drive an SUV like their parents did. I guarantee this.
So station wagons lasted from, what, the 1950s to the 1980s, as the "default family car"?
Minivans, by comparison, only had ~15 years of being the default family car, with the SUV craze taking off about 5-10 years after minivans took off.
...but the SUV and CUV craze has only
accelerated, ~25-30 years after it started (note that the first modern CUVs were ~20-25 years ago, and were called "cute utes", and were lumped in with the small true SUVs - like, the Suzuki Sidekick/Geo Tracker, Toyota RAV4, and Honda CR-V were considered the same thing by the market, even though the Sidekick/Tracker was a real SUV), and even younger people without families are buying them.
There will always be SUVs, and minivans, and station wagons. But when this is what is being trotted out as an SUV, then what is the justification of this over a station wagon? Ride height? Are folks going to figure out soon that we don't live in Angola and ride height is such a non-requirement in the US as to be laughable?
Have you
seen the roads in large parts of the US? (Given your stated location, I suspect you have.)
Ground clearance isn't necessary, but the additional suspension travel that a higher ground clearance vehicle can have is helpful for comfort. Our roads really are developing nation bad in many states.
But, that's not really why people are buying SUVs and CUVs in droves.
The real reason is a combination of factors that basically boil down to encouraging a high seating position.
It's easier to get in and out of higher seats, and to deal with a child seat in higher seats. People getting taller, older, and heavier doesn't help this, either.
In the US market, remember that full-size pickup trucks are one of the largest market segments, and those are
huge, especially nowadays. You don't stand a chance of seeing over or around them in a smaller car. In a SUV/CUV, you do stand such a chance due to the higher seating position (and then you block the smaller cars' vision yourself, too).
Due to the prevalence of full-size pickup trucks, SUVs, and CUVs, side impacts are taken at a higher height. This requires a higher beltline to survive side impacts, reducing outward visibility out of lower cars. Elevating the seating position gets you up above the beltline, so you can actually see. Similarly, European pedestrian safety regulations, combined with the popularity of long-stroke DOHC engines for efficiency reasons (as opposed to shorter-stroke engines and cam-in-block engines), raise the hoodline, which reduces forward visibility, and creates stylistic pressures to raise the beltline. Moving the seat up restores that visibility. (Note that EVs can have lower hoodlines as a result of not having any engine up front, and Tesla takes advantage of this, but side impact is still an issue for the American market.)