sub
Active Member
I don't think they are intentionally hiding flaws.
But I do think the dramatic lighting and design ethos attached to it is very likely intentional - irrespective of what they building realities were. After all, they could have gone for more traditional, expansive overhead lighting to achieve an effect similar to natural light, but instead they went for dramatic effect. A co-incidence? I doubt it.
Tesla seems to like dramatic effect, even when it is counterintuitive for the delivery inspection process, apparently.
Isn't your point proving the lighting wasn't sufficient for the inspection?
And you would lack the ability to decline delivery, in that event of take it home and inspect later. There might be disagreements on what was there and not, etc. Even if it isn't intentionally hard for the inspection (and I agree, I don't think it is), the dramatic lighting may still play a part in hiding some flaws that otherwise might have resulted in the buyer decliding delivery. Asking to take the car outside sounds possible, but again, an extra effort that people may be reluctant to do...
So as an end-result, the lighting may hinder the delivery inspection. IMO that seems like a fact. No?
So you're saying that the design was intentional? Thanks, I'm pretty sure nothing designs itself. The problem I have with your statement is your at best implying they did it that way to "hide" flaws.
Sorry, you have no proof of that but if it makes you sleep better you go ahead and have fun with that.
I was literally there 24 hours ago, have you been there? You can see fine, I spotted tiny clear cost bubbles (1mm) no problem. I personally hate bright artificial lights.
I could see well enough to know there was no issue with the vehicle that would cause me to refuse delivery. I also am not the type to spend an hour going through a checklist at the location, did the rest of it at my house at my leisure. I don't assume the worst in people at all times, Tesla will take care of any issues.