zoomer0056
Active Member
You gotta set it like that, it's an option. Auto direction is also a beta feature.And with the S it suggests mode of travel and all you need to do is tap and go!!
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You gotta set it like that, it's an option. Auto direction is also a beta feature.And with the S it suggests mode of travel and all you need to do is tap and go!!
Tesla only publishes the numbers furnished to them via EPA testing, so how exactly is TESLA overstating the range?Well, the “redesign” and interior “changes” don’t make me want to get one; eliminating the stalks is a mistake, the yoke isn’t compulsory as it was on the MS or even an option, good.
The additional range? not really, as it’s been proven Tesla overestimates its range and this very website posted articles where the real range was 10 to 13% shorter than its official EPA, so maybe you’ll get what they were previously telling you.
Would it kill them to put an little dash in front of the driver? doesn’t need to be like the MS but something …
Also, it looks like the design was thought out to please the Asian markets, it looks like a BYD/Hyundai/Kia, no wonder it was launched in China first.
Yeah, hatchbacks are way more usefull than a trunk. Prices just went down, you can get an S for $70k with incentive.Love the highland. Only disappointed is no hatchback.
Really, it's not difficult. Swipe up for forward, swipe down for reverse, tap P for park. Eezy peezy.Still doesn't sound very intuitive to me. So you have to swipe to let the car know of your intention on turns if Nav is not active?
The swipe on the screen is for forward or reverse. If you are asking about turn signals, those are buttons on the steering wheel.Still doesn't sound very intuitive to me. So you have to swipe to let the car know of your intention on turns if Nav is not active?
That's what I want to know too. There are so many roundabouts here. Turning left requires 2 signal actions in a round about. Signal your intention of a turn when entering the round about, and signaling the opposite direction to exit the round about. Without nav, how does it know which one you want to exit?Curious. How does the car know where you want to go when nav is not used? Also, how does it work on roundabouts? I really don't want to think about which button to press when the wheel is upside down...
This thread probably doesn't need to devolve into how Tesla is the worst offender on overstating range, but the numbers from the EPA can be done with 2 different tests. Tesla chooses the set of tests that gives them the highest, most unrealistic number, and publishes those. Pretty much every other manufacturer uses the other set of tests that provide results that are much closer to what you will actually see.Tesla only publishes the numbers furnished to them via EPA testing, so how exactly is TESLA overstating the range?
There are still indicator buttons. They just are on the steering wheel and not the stalk. You are getting confused with the other stalk which is used to put the car in drive/reverse and used with cruise control. Drive/Reverse is now automatic or able to be chosen manually on the screen. Cruise control must be a button on the wheel now.That's what I want to know too. There are so many roundabouts here. Turning left requires 2 signal actions in a round about. Signal your intention of a turn when entering the round about, and signaling the opposite direction to exit the round about. Without nav, how does it know which one you want to exit?
Hey I love my 22’ M3LR/boost! (Hw3 and USS and already 576km range..not the reduced).now all the "old" model 3 owners: "hate it, ugly, old one looks better, no stalks" lol
from many who dont own any tesla, the new version is preferred simply by looks. old one just seems dated now, i mean its been like that since 2018, doesnt look sporty or sleek with the bulbous body and headlights making it look like a fish or a creature. the new headlights and tailights give it more of a sleek edgy look. although could have been better with more depth on lower part of front bumper with fogs, as is looks plain, but headlights are very welcomed.
then add all the new features, ambient lighting, increase range, better sound insulation better sound, etc etc. a $5K discount is not enough to warrant to buy the OLD 23 version over highland.
sorry those who just bought the 23, went from a new car to old in a matter of days
Not confused. When in a round about your wheel is no longer in the upright position. Now, when signaling your exit you need to find the signal button on an interface that may be upside down.There are still indicator buttons. They just are on the steering wheel and not the stalk. You are getting confused with the other stalk which is used to put the car in drive/reverse and used with cruise control. Drive/Reverse is now automatic or able to be chosen manually on the screen. Cruise control must be a button on the wheel now.
So let me understand this. If it was your company, you would use the formula that provides the worst stats? How is that ethical?This thread probably doesn't need to devolve into how Tesla is the worst offender on overstating range, but the numbers from the EPA can be done with 2 different tests. Tesla chooses the set of tests that gives them the highest, most unrealistic number, and publishes those. Pretty much every other manufacturer uses the other set of tests that provide results that are much closer to what you will actually see.
Yes they are doing nothing illegal. Yes the test is obviously flawed that is used by the EPA, but just because something is not illegal does not make it ethical.
Do we know the variables they took into account for the EPA Range ? For ex : MY LR gives 330 but only if you can get an efficiency of 250 kw/h mile. I get that efficiency when I drive my ev like my old Honda with zero sprints , sticking to speed limits and only on inner roads. In fact when the weather is cooler ( I live in Central FL) sometimes I even get efficiency of 220 . I am not sure how we can get this efficiency in highways. Any thoughts/suggestions appreciated!This thread probably doesn't need to devolve into how Tesla is the worst offender on overstating range, but the numbers from the EPA can be done with 2 different tests. Tesla chooses the set of tests that gives them the highest, most unrealistic number, and publishes those. Pretty much every other manufacturer uses the other set of tests that provide results that are much closer to what you will actually see.
Yes they are doing nothing illegal. Yes the test is obviously flawed that is used by the EPA, but just because something is not illegal does not make it ethical.
I don't know why people defend this but again, Tesla is CHOOSING to provide misleading information.So let me understand this. If it was your company, you would use the formula that provides the worst stats? How is that ethical?
There will still be a fan to blow air through the seats, but that air will not be cooled by AC directly. It will just be cabin air. I think ventilated seats (with a fan) are still a nice upgrade over what we have now.Has anyone addressed the "ventilated" vs cooled seats? To me, ventilated just means the seat material has the small holes / perforated material in it but there is no "active cooling" of the seats. So the seats are ventilated but not actually cooled?