SomeJoe7777
Marginally-Known Member
Somebody shares an article that has any criticism of Tesla or the Model 3, and legions of forum members post up railing against the "hit piece" by Tesla haters.
I agree with most of what's been said in the rest of the thread, in that there are most certainly negative things about the company, the service, and the cars, but I find them minor compared to the positive things. Discussion of those items is warranted and necessary.
The knee-jerk defensive reaction to other articles on this forum is sometimes warranted. I have no problem with any author who writes a piece that addresses Tesla's very real flaws in a factually accurate manner. But to be frank, those articles are rare. Far more prevalent are articles that contain inaccurate, out-of-date, or blatantly made-up information that is presented as factual, then proceed down a path of criticism based on those assertions.
Both those authors as well as the Tesla fanboys do a disservice. The only way the flaws will get addressed is frank, truthful discussion without emotive attachment, as well as calling out the opposite in the articles that aren't accurate.