You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure, my point was that the alternate uptick rule kicks in at a 10% drop from the previous day's close, not anything pre market. You called out the correct trigger of 151.03, but stated they got it to 1% of that point when it was still 3% away at the lowest point.The intraday high during the main session today was 175.05 and we touched 179.14 in the pre-Market 2 mins after the CPI data came out (b4 shortzes got their boots on):
Pre-Market High $179.14 (08:32:04 AM)
View attachment 884687
So hedgies dropped the SP about 11.9% from the high to the low (before covering into the Close), all the while avoiding triggering the uptick rule.
Nobody said they're not good at what they do, it's just that what they do is evel.
Depends who the naysayers are. When they're Apollo astronauts, he cares.^^And Musk has never been one to give two ****s what the naysayers said. If he did he wouldn't have built the companies he's built.
Never did hear any contrition from Armstrong et al when SpaceX did successfully land a rocket, then 2 rockets at once, then reused those rockets numerous times, and has now done it ~150 times!Depends who the naysayers are. When they're Apollo astronauts, he cares.
Never did hear any contrition from Armstrong et al when SpaceX did successfully land a rocket, then 2 rockets at once, then reused those rockets numerous times, and has now done it ~150 times!
Did anyone of them publicly apologize to Elon? It was well deserved...
As I stated "any one of them." Wasn't just Armstrong...Given Armstrong was dead several years by the time SpaceX landed a rocket successfully I think he gets a pass on not commenting on them accomplishing that.
As I stated "any one of them." Wasn't just Armstrong...
Thanks for the link! Answers my question.It also wasn't actually the critical anti-spaceX stuff 60 minutes claimed either- and many of them DID CALL THEM OUT ON THAT.
Including Armstrong.
Who wrote a letter to 60 minutes after the story aired pointing out they'd been incomplete in their reporting- and many others likewise criticized or corrected 60 minutes over the years.
See some examples here:
Why were Neil Armstrong, Eugene Cernan, and Neil DeGrasse Tyson all opposed to SpaceX?
Answer (1 of 10): I’m sure my answer will ruffle a lot of feathers. But here it goes… Corporativism. Some of those characters want things to stay the same, cause they have friends that might loose their jobs due to SpaceX. Or simple feel that their territory is being shrunk. None of those guys...www.quora.com
They did not. And they will not anymore than people here have apologized for past bs nor will apologize when you know what becomes something amazing they had no imagination to, well, imagine.Never did hear any contrition from Armstrong et al when SpaceX did successfully land a rocket, then 2 rockets at once, then reused those rockets numerous times, and has now done it ~150 times!
Did any one of them publicly apologize to Elon? It was well deserved...
Never did hear any contrition from Armstrong et al when SpaceX did successfully land a rocket, then 2 rockets at once, then reused those rockets numerous times, and has now done it ~150 times!
Did any one of them publicly apologize to Elon? It was well deserved...
Umm...wut?
Other than this short term benefit edge case:The current $3,750 discount right off the purchase price is already a far better deal than the tax credit that will be available next year, which won't happen at the point of purchase (not until 2024) and hinges on income limits, owing tax, etc etc
With you.Since its the holidays, I'll share what brought me here to this forum...it's to find like-minded people that care about averting climate change.
Not with you.“If we don’t act boldly, the bill that could come due will be mass migrations, and cities submerged and nations displaced, and food supplies decimated, and conflicts born of despair,” he said.
Most of it already sounds familiar to current events, yeah? Happy Holidays, everyone...
Please create a thread titled Insane Speculation and move these types of posts over there.
Not with you.
As someone who regularly gets absolutely slammed by devastating natural disasters because of where I live, I have no idea what this has to do with mass migrations, which I assume you mean to be from Central America into the US (I have to assume, because you didn't explain).
I have a post above that might apply:
Yeah, still not with you.Haiti...Dominican Republic...Cuba...Guatemala...Peru...etc. just in 2022.
Without getting into speculative territory, it's worth reading through the major events that preclude the mass migrations from those countries...e.g. Haiti.
These appear to be local govt incentives but I'm not easily finding them from official Chinese sources. Anyone have a link to the original documents in Chinese for these incentives?@Troy looks like there’s another couple incentives Tesla China just added AGAIN in Shanghai and Shengzhen
I have a suggestion that might help moderate things so I can go back to mostly just reading and not posting. If you want to talk about things not *very immediately directly related to TSLA or Tesla* you can just DM me. I like to chat!
I have no idea what you're going on about. I get hurricaned badly, regularly. It's been happening forever where I live. Can you please just DM me or something? Or talk to chatGPT?Ok, would people have to migrate en masse if the infrastructure for clean energy was available fully in their countries to have more resilient capabilities to live their lives...?
Tesla tried to prioritize deliveries of products to Puerto Rico due to a few hurricanes that hit the island the past few years. Same with Tonga...Musk is trying to at least add internet connectivity to these countries with Starlink (e.g. Google Haiti and Starlink, if interested).