SageBrush
REJECT Fascism
It would be interesting to know the epidemiology of 'kWh'.
At this rate someone will write about the viral load in watts
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It would be interesting to know the epidemiology of 'kWh'.
From Wikipedia:I've wondered about that.
The SI system, also called the metric system, is used around the world. There are seven basic units in the SI system: the meter (m), the kilogram (kg), the second (s), the kelvin (K), the ampere (A), the mole (mol), and the candela (cd).
Agreed. kWh is IMHO an easier metric. We just need a new name that's harder to mix with kW.
Not clear on your point. It is true that joule, watt, as well as volt, are all derived from base units.From Wikipedia:
I think the volt is fly in the ointment.
Not clear on your point. It is true that joule, watt, as well as volt, are all derived from base units.
My hypothesis is that a century ago an electrical device's power was rated in watts, rather than J/s, and that led to measuring energy in Wh (and kWh) rather than joules.
Sorry, I meant the AmpNot clear on your point. It is true that joule, watt, as well as volt, are all derived from base units.
I believe I actually started a thread on this topic simply because it's a big stumbling block for homeowners trying to buy solar. Personally, I think the average bloke could wrap his head around the "number of elon's(©) produced annually" much more easily thank kilowatt-hours.Agreed. kWh is IMHO an easier metric. We just need a new name that's harder to mix with kW.
More generally, most people are not well-versed in the hard sciences, even if some did take basic classes in high school (or college). It is hardly surprising that this stuff is a mystery to that large population, some of whom drive electric cars without understanding concepts of power versus energy.Sorry, I meant the Amp
I think most people can grasp units of amount, and amount per time
By extension -- energy, and energy per time.
Or work, and work per time
The base units of Kg, distance and seconds plug in nicely.
But Amps are a base unit and few people can translate volts*Amps into energy per time using base units
I know that my wife chokes on these ideas because she cannot shake the desire to treat 'watt' as an amount
This helped me to conceptualize Joules, Watts and Watt-Hours. Maybe somewhat oddly I had a hard time conceptualizing what a 'Joule' was. Made me realize how contrived kWh is... the 'h' basically mutates a unit of power into a unit of energy.
You call it mutation, I call it math.
In your terms, I could argue that it's actually reversing the mutation.
That's the point. Time has no business being part of an energy unit.Maybe... but Watt is a unit of Power and Joule is a unit of Energy. Just seems a little weird to use a unit of power and time to express energy instead of just using a unit of energy.
It would be like selling Gasoline by the HPh. $0.04 / HPh
Or if you said an Engine was 300k J/s in stead of 400 HP. We have different units for power and energy for a reason. It would be possible to express all energy and power as J and J/s or Wh and W but that just gets ungainly.
That's the point. Time has no business being part of an energy unit.
You might find it amusing to start from Newton's observation that an object traveling at a constant velocity has no force applied. The converse then is a force acting on an object (in the same direction as travel) must result in object acceleration, meter per second per second.I didn't really realize that there IS a time component to a Joule.
You might find it amusing to start from Newton's observation that an object traveling at a constant velocity has no force applied. The converse then is a force acting on an object (in the same direction as travel) must result in object acceleration, meter per second per second.
Work is defined as force over a distance, so we end up with meter * (meter per second per second)
Interesting that Newton's insight into gravity - Apple falling from the tree - came while he was quarantined from the plague in his country home and was out sitting under a tree. Might not have happened otherwise.Yeah... I'm still working on conceptualizing force. Amps, Volts and Watts all 'mean' something to me. Newtons not so much...
Some of the definitions of Joule include time, others not..... Energy is defined as Work / Time. Time is an inseparable part of energy. A Joule is;
View attachment 617690
I think that's why I had such a hard time conceptualizing a Joule. I didn't really realize that there IS a time component to a Joule. That's why you have to add the 'h' to kWh. The 1 h 'cancels out' the 3600 seconds in a Joule so you can express a unit of power (kW) as a unit of energy (kWh).
Kinda funny if you look at how these units are derived. A Joule is defined by moving a kg 1m so 'kg' is a basis for a Joule. A kg is now based on Planks Constant which is ~6.6E-34 (J)(s). So Js are based on kg and kg are based on Js....
Conceptualizing ?!Yeah... I'm still working on conceptualizing force
They care about the power too. They charge a load factor for commercial users.My hypothesis is that electricity companies care about use of power, so charge you for power x time.