Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Prediction: Coal has fallen. Nuclear is next then Oil.

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
That's quite an about-face! Even as recently as 2018, the IEA didn't project renewables to exceed gas and coal until 2040! Might we actually see it happen sooner than 2024? Maybe even 2023 with the deployment of more megapacks?

I think you're confusing the IEA (International Energy Agency) with the EIA (Eternal coal In America). Hence the 2420 joke. ;)
 
I think you're confusing the IEA (International Energy Agency) with the EIA (Eternal coal In America). Hence the 2420 joke. ;)

Yes, I wasn't confused. The EIA getting it wrong was to be expected. The IEA getting it wrong was a real head-scratcher. Their worst one was in 2017: IEA Gets Hilariously Slammed For Obsessively Inaccurate Renewable Energy Forecasts

Their 2018 report showed renewables growing faster (but only making up 40% of global energy), but relied on bioenergy to provide that growth: Good News, Bad News: Renewable Energy Growing But Not Fast Enough

So for their most recent report to acknowledge that wind and solar will surpass fossil fuels in 2024 ... that's a HUGE jump!
 
  • Like
Reactions: nwdiver
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
Bloomberg: Primary Energy vs Final Energy: Why Replacing Fossil Fuels Won't Be So Hard.
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

The way we think about how much fossil fuels contribute to our energy mix overplays its utility. That’s because much of the energy from burning fossil fuels is lost as waste heat and noise, or as BloombergNEF’s Colin McKerracher puts it: “just sound and fury, signifying nothing.”

The average efficiency of coal power plants globally is about 33%, according to the World Coal Association. That is, only a third of the energy stored in the black lumps is converted to electricity. Many modern internal combustion engine cars have an efficiency of about 20%, transforming only a fifth of gasoline’s energy into motion.

As the world consumes more energy from renewables in the form of electricity, it manages similar economic output while consuming less primary energy. Generating electricity from solar and wind is highly efficient, and motors inside electric vehicles convert more than 80% of the energy stored in batteries into motion.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: SmartElectric
As the world consumes more energy from renewables in the form of electricity, it manages similar economic output while consuming less primary energy.
Yep, and devices like heat pumps still have a lot of room for improvement. There is also a vast conservation potential that is untapped.

Remember the UK physicist who was so far off the mark because he missed these rather basic points ? He must be amazed that the UK is only a few short years away from being fossil free
 
  • Like
Reactions: mspohr
Stranded assets...
CPS Energy says hefty debt means coal plant has to stay open - for now

CPS Energy’s chief executive said Wednesday that the city-owned utility owes too much money on its newer coal-fired power plant unit to commit to closing it this decade — a move some activist groups are demanding.

In a virtual meeting with the San Antonio Express-News’ Editorial Board, CPS president and CEO Paula Gold-Williams said the utility still owes $1 billion on its Spruce 2 coal unit, which went online in 2010.

“Our coal plant, one of the last built in the U.S., for good reason, is an economic loser,” said Greg Harman, an organizer with the Sierra Club. “(Gold-Williams) warns today that walking away is not an option. But there is no better response to the alternative of losing tens of millions of dollars a year that these coal purchases represent.”
 
  • Informative
Reactions: SmartElectric
Stranded assets...
CPS Energy says hefty debt means coal plant has to stay open - for now

CPS Energy’s chief executive said Wednesday that the city-owned utility owes too much money on its newer coal-fired power plant unit to commit to closing it this decade — a move some activist groups are demanding.

In a virtual meeting with the San Antonio Express-News’ Editorial Board, CPS president and CEO Paula Gold-Williams said the utility still owes $1 billion on its Spruce 2 coal unit, which went online in 2010.

Our coal plant, one of the last built in the U.S., for good reason, is an economic loser,” said Greg Harman, an organizer with the Sierra Club. “(Gold-Williams) warns today that walking away is not an option. But there is no better response to the alternative of losing tens of millions of dollars a year that these coal purchases represent.”

I'm glad Greg Harman was able to express that thought. They're already in the hole $1B, why dig it deeper?!
 
Electric Power Monthly! A day late because vacation.

November edition, for capacity changes and generation September 2020.

It finally happened. Coal rolling 12 month generation fell below that of nuclear.

After a relatively good August, September saw coal generation return to the previous pattern of decline.

Coal capacity was reduced by 650MW in September 2020, to 222,390.6MW. Forecast capacity reductions are unchanged at -4,785.4MW.

Coal's rolling 12 month share dropped another 0.30% to 19.42%, a drop of 5.26% from 12 months ago. Coal was 48.21% of generation in 2008. September 2020 generation was 68.4TWh compared to 85.9TWh in 2019, and rolling 12 month generation falling to 788.5TWh compared to 1,030.4TWh a year ago.

Nuclear capacity reduced by 601.4MW in September 2020, to 96,519.5MW. Planned capacity reductions increased by 2,300MW to -3,317.9MW. The increase is due to the planned closure of Exelon's plan in Byron, IL in September 2021. (In November 2021, Excelon's remaining Dresden, IL plant will also be closed, reducing nuclear generation capacity by another 1,797MW).

Nuclear generation was down in August 2020 (69.0TWh v 71.9TWh), with rolling generation at 798.5TWh compared with 803.8TWh to July 2019.

Coal generation in September is generally one of the low high months, as demand is falling from the summer peak. That September generation is now lower than the annual April lows from 2018 and earlier shows how much generation has dropped.

Rolling 12 month coal generation has fallen 241.9TWh in 12 months. Coal generation during that period was 9.6TWh less than nuclear. While we could expect an uptick in capacity factors compared to last year's mild winter, coal capacity reduced over 11GW in the past 12 months, and over 6GW year to date, with another 3GW of closures planned for 2020Q4. With nuclear reductions being much less, and none planned for 2020Q4, it's possible that rolling nuclear generation will remain above that of coal through the next 12 months.

Coal generation capacity factors fell to 43.6%, down from 51.6% in September 2020, and much lower than 55.3% in 2018.

Coal:

Capacity (MW):
PeriodPriorChangeNewChange
Month223,040.6-650.0222,390.6-0.29%
YTD228,657.4-6,266.8222,390.6-2.74%
Rolling233,847.0-11,456.4222,390.6-4.90%
Plan +12mo-5,435.40.0-4,785.4-2.15%

Capacity Factor (MW):
ValuePriorChangeNewChange
Month Capacity235,012.7-12,622.1222,390.6-5.37%
Month Factor51.6%-8.0%43.6%-15.50%
Rolling 12mo Factor49.9%-9.5%40.4%-19.02%

Generation (GWh):
YearMonthYTDRollingMonth %YTD%Rolling
201985,918750,0491,030,45023.70%23.58%24.68%
202068,396573,646788,55320.24%18.63%19.42%
Difference-17,522-176,403-241,897-3.46%-4.96%-5.26%

Nuclear:

Capacity (MW):
PeriodPriorChangeNewChange
Month97,120.9-601.496,519.5-0.62%
YTD98,119.0-1,599.596,519.5-1.63%
Rolling98,119.0-1,599.596,519.5-1.63%
Plan +12mo-1,619.3-2,300.0-3,317.9-3.44%

Capacity Factor (MW):
ValuePriorChangeNewChange
Month Capacity98,106.1-1,586.696,519.5-1.62%
Month Factor92.8%1.8%94.6%1.94%
Rolling 12mo Factor92.6%0.5%93.1%0.49%

Generation (GWh):
YearMonthYTDRollingMonth %YTD%Rolling
201965,892610,178805,18618.18%19.18%19.28%
202065,727598,925798,15719.45%19.45%19.65%
Difference-165-11,253-7,0291.27%0.26%0.37%
 
Electric Power Monthly! A day late because vacation.

November edition, for capacity changes and generation September 2020.

It finally happened. Coal rolling 12 month generation fell below that of nuclear.

After a relatively good August, September saw coal generation return to the previous pattern of decline.

Coal capacity was reduced by 650MW in September 2020, to 222,390.6MW. Forecast capacity reductions are unchanged at -4,785.4MW.

Coal's rolling 12 month share dropped another 0.30% to 19.42%, a drop of 5.26% from 12 months ago. Coal was 48.21% of generation in 2008. September 2020 generation was 68.4TWh compared to 85.9TWh in 2019, and rolling 12 month generation falling to 788.5TWh compared to 1,030.4TWh a year ago.

Nuclear capacity reduced by 601.4MW in September 2020, to 96,519.5MW. Planned capacity reductions increased by 2,300MW to -3,317.9MW. The increase is due to the planned closure of Exelon's plan in Byron, IL in September 2021. (In November 2021, Excelon's remaining Dresden, IL plant will also be closed, reducing nuclear generation capacity by another 1,797MW).

Nuclear generation was down in August 2020 (69.0TWh v 71.9TWh), with rolling generation at 798.5TWh compared with 803.8TWh to July 2019.

Coal generation in September is generally one of the low high months, as demand is falling from the summer peak. That September generation is now lower than the annual April lows from 2018 and earlier shows how much generation has dropped.

Rolling 12 month coal generation has fallen 241.9TWh in 12 months. Coal generation during that period was 9.6TWh less than nuclear. While we could expect an uptick in capacity factors compared to last year's mild winter, coal capacity reduced over 11GW in the past 12 months, and over 6GW year to date, with another 3GW of closures planned for 2020Q4. With nuclear reductions being much less, and none planned for 2020Q4, it's possible that rolling nuclear generation will remain above that of coal through the next 12 months.

Coal generation capacity factors fell to 43.6%, down from 51.6% in September 2020, and much lower than 55.3% in 2018.

Coal:

Capacity (MW):
PeriodPriorChangeNewChange
Month223,040.6-650.0222,390.6-0.29%
YTD228,657.4-6,266.8222,390.6-2.74%
Rolling233,847.0-11,456.4222,390.6-4.90%
Plan +12mo-5,435.40.0-4,785.4-2.15%

Capacity Factor (MW):
ValuePriorChangeNewChange
Month Capacity235,012.7-12,622.1222,390.6-5.37%
Month Factor51.6%-8.0%43.6%-15.50%
Rolling 12mo Factor49.9%-9.5%40.4%-19.02%

Generation (GWh):
YearMonthYTDRollingMonth %YTD%Rolling
201985,918750,0491,030,45023.70%23.58%24.68%
202068,396573,646788,55320.24%18.63%19.42%
Difference-17,522-176,403-241,897-3.46%-4.96%-5.26%

Nuclear:

Capacity (MW):
PeriodPriorChangeNewChange
Month97,120.9-601.496,519.5-0.62%
YTD98,119.0-1,599.596,519.5-1.63%
Rolling98,119.0-1,599.596,519.5-1.63%
Plan +12mo-1,619.3-2,300.0-3,317.9-3.44%

Capacity Factor (MW):
ValuePriorChangeNewChange
Month Capacity98,106.1-1,586.696,519.5-1.62%
Month Factor92.8%1.8%94.6%1.94%
Rolling 12mo Factor92.6%0.5%93.1%0.49%

Generation (GWh):
YearMonthYTDRollingMonth %YTD%Rolling
201965,892610,178805,18618.18%19.18%19.28%
202065,727598,925798,15719.45%19.45%19.65%
Difference-165-11,253-7,0291.27%0.26%0.37%

Isn't there a capacity factor threshold that makes the power plant uneconomic to even operate (fuel and labor costs exceed revenue)?
 
Varies from plant to plant but I think the average is probably ~110% ;)

It's almost entirely labor. Fuel cost for a nuclear plant is a rounding error, IIRC it's <$0.20/MWh.

Jokes aside, 100% (or close to it) must include capitalization costs. I meant just operating costs, as that's the point where people realize when a project is truly dead.
 
Here's a graph of cumulative planned utility-scale summer capacity changes (excluding most small changes) from the EIA data, up to and including 12/2025.

Note that these are planned, not forecast changes.

This isn't weighted by capacity factor, but you see how net additions are currently dominated by renewables, natural gas combined cycle, followed by batteries and NG combustion turbine, but with the renewable additions flattening.

Below 0, we see conventional and older generation, with net reductions for coal, nuclear, NG steam turbine and petroleum liquids.

It looks possible that
These changes are a small part of total capacity. Just for coal there is still over 220,000MW of generation capacity, while planned net retirements to the end of 2025 are less than 30,000MW.

eia202011202010202512_cum_cap_changes.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: ReddyLeaf
  • Helpful
  • Informative
Reactions: Big Earl and mspohr