misuse of kW and kWh leads to genuine confusion IME.
Yep. That's why I pay particular attention to ensure I'm using the units correctly and harangue others especially if they know better.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
misuse of kW and kWh leads to genuine confusion IME.
It would be like selling Gasoline by the HPh. $0.04 / HPh
Yep. That's why I pay particular attention to ensure I'm using the units correctly and harangue others especially if they know better.
View attachment 617750
Perhaps we can discuss something besides units. Inline with the thread title:
100% of New US Power Capacity Was Wind & Solar Power in October
Bluewaters coal-fired power station written off as worthless as renewables rise
Australian coal-fired power plant bought for $1.2b now 'effectively has no value'
The owners of Australia's newest coal-fired power station have written down the value of the asset to zero, wiping out a $1.2 billion investment in the face of an onslaught of renewable energy.
There are not enough voting buttons for this!Bluewaters coal-fired power station written off as worthless as renewables rise
Australian coal-fired power plant bought for $1.2b now 'effectively has no value'
The owners of Australia's newest coal-fired power station have written down the value of the asset to zero, wiping out a $1.2 billion investment in the face of an onslaught of renewable energy.
Bluewaters coal-fired power station written off as worthless as renewables rise
Australian coal-fired power plant bought for $1.2b now 'effectively has no value'
The owners of Australia's newest coal-fired power station have written down the value of the asset to zero, wiping out a $1.2 billion investment in the face of an onslaught of renewable energy.
Bloomberg says coal is going to come back.
Bloomberg: Global Thirst for Coal to Return Once Pandemic Ends.
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?: Global
Then stop focusing on CO2. The pollution emitted from coal burning is millions to billions of times greater than NG. Over 6.5 million people die a year from air pollution. It's the #1 cause of cancer. It kills many times more ecologically.I enjoy watching coal die as much as the next person but NG makes me sad. Stanford's Jacobson says NG is worse than coal from a GHG perspective and I don't see any reason to doubt him.
Bad headline for two reasons:
1) It's really just return to normality
2) It should be hunger for coal, since it's a solid.
You do have to factor in methane leakage. Methane is a powerful (~30x CO2) greenhouse gas.Then stop focusing on CO2. The pollution emitted from coal burning is millions to billions of times greater than NG. Over 6.5 million people die a year from air pollution. It's the #1 cause of cancer. It kills many times more ecologically.
NG plants are also ~45% thermodynamically efficient verses about 35% for coal. So that only leaves extraction as the source for the claim that coal is better. I doubt this assertion too because NG comes with oil extraction. Have you seen what coal strip mines look like? Having run the numbers, NG is the most responsible stop-gap while renewables (wind/tide/solar/etc NOT biomass) ramp up to almost all of our energy generation. Not fission, not coal, not oil, etc.
Just a fart in the wind compared to pollution or fission storage. And in Canada, most, if not all, capture methane, unlike the US were there is so much methane flaring that some areas, like North Dakota, look like cities when flying over.You do have to factor in methane leakage. Methane is a powerful (~30x CO2) greenhouse gas.
Large Methane Leaks Reveal Long-Standing Shortfalls in OversightJust a fart in the wind compared to pollution or fission storage. And in Canada, most, if not all, capture methane, unlike the US were there is so much methane flaring that some areas, like North Dakota, look like cities when flying over.