I looked at it too, I like everything about it except how cramped and inefficient it is. The S has 120 CF of interior volume and the I5 M60 only has 109 CF
(classifying it as a compact car). The trunk is equally cramped with only 11 CF compared to the S's 25 CF (also no frunk). A
lso the AWD range (21" wheels) is pretty low at 240 miles opting for the 19" wheels would yield 256 miles vs 405 miles more in line with the S's 19" wheels. I do like the active roll bars, that would be a pretty cool option, but I couldn't find lateral acceleration numbers / Skidpad to see the benefit. I doubt it beats the 1.08g's that a PLAID delivers. It also strange that the Model X is more efficient than all the i5's with 103 MPGe vs the i5's 85 MPGe, giving even the X (classified as an SUV) a range advantage of over 108 miles verses the i5 (a compact car) in top config, with almost equal performance 3.5 0-60 vers 3.8 for the Base X. The i5 in the most efficient config gets 105 MPGe in the RWD variant with 19" wheels, increasing range to 295 (still out performed by Tesla's entry level LR 3 @ 358 miles / 131 MPGe and LR AWD Y @ 330 Miles / 122 MPGe with 0-60 dropping to 5.7 seconds, Tesla had never made a car this slow in any variant, even the X which is classified as an SUV can keep up with this i5. Top speed is limited to 120 MPH in the base I5 and 144 MPH with summer tires and 130 MPH with All Season tires in the fully loaded i5 M60, verses 155 in both the Base S and X and maxed out to 200 MPH in the top end PLAID S.
I not going to touch price, as it's more expensive in the base config than a base S or even a base X, put can be outperformed by pretty much any Tesla made in the last year or so, configuration dependent.
Summary a $42K Tesla can beat a $85K BMW... why would anyone buy this, especially the RWD base model. I bet the new 3 coming out will beat the performance of this car in top spec.