Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Russia/Ukraine conflict

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Putin appears to be taking sides now with Shoigu calling for Russia’s “volunteer detachments” fighting in Ukraine to be placed under the direct control of the defense ministry "as quickly as possible".

Let’s see where this goes and if there is further meltdown from Prigozhin. We may have another accidental fall out of window or accidental ingestion of life incompatible substances soon.


Putin sides with military chiefs over placing Wagner under direct control
 

So knives re coming out. No idea if this is completely true but who cares

It's classic Putin. Putin has stayed in power by having subordinates who could challenge him fight one another. For an autocrat, it's good politics. For a country fighting a major war, it's incredibly dumb.

Putin appears to be taking sides now with Shoigu calling for Russia’s “volunteer detachments” fighting in Ukraine to be placed under the direct control of the defense ministry "as quickly as possible".

Let’s see where this goes and if there is further meltdown from Prigozhin. We may have another accidental fall out of window or accidental ingestion of life incompatible substances soon.


Putin sides with military chiefs over placing Wagner under direct control

From an organizational point of view it does make sense to put all units under one command. Having separate commands with no overarching structure is weak.

However, the only commander Russia has who has any competence is Prigozhin. They won't do it, but they should give Prigozhin Shoigu's job.

Good. Hungary would probably forward it to Russia anyways as "humanitarian aid".

It would be difficult for them to get them to Russia. The only mechanism would be on a cargo flight because there is no land connection between the two countries Hungary could use. And a transport plane capable of loading the vehicles would be noticed and would get the rest of NATO riled up. If they managed to get off the ground in Hungary, the plane would be intercepted as soon as it entered the airspace of any other country and forced down on the soil of a NATO ally.

Then Hungary would be put on the list of pariah countries. Hungary's economy is interwoven with the EU's at this point. Cutting them off economically would be devastating. Leaving the EU has been bad for the UK economy when they had years to prepare. Culling an EU member overnight, especially a smaller economy would be a disaster.

Orban can play games on the edges to help Russia, but he can't be too blatant. The real world consequences for being too blatant would ruin Hungary. Orban and Erdogan need to be curbed. The rabid conservatives running Poland are fortunately also rabid pro-Ukraine, but they aren't very good for Poland long term either.

Anyway, blocking new NATO weapon systems to Hungary until they come back into the fold is a good first step. Before the war Turkey was in negotiations to get F-35s, but they bought an S-400 system from Russia and the deal was killed because of that. In the end Turkey will probably never see their S-400.
 
Prigozhin is a hard liner, but he speaks the truth far more than his Russian fascist mafia counterparts:

He is also a cold-blooded killer and a psychopath. If he says something truthful, it is for gain or manipulation. He is an inside outsider, which leads him act a bit differently than the uniformed and Gov apparatus. He lies for enjoyment, and tells the truth for enjoyment or gainl

The one time I thought he was being unusually forthright was when he told a reporter that 'Putin's Cook' is a misnomer; 'Putin's Butcher' was a more apt description.
 
He is also a cold-blooded killer and a psychopath. If he says something truthful, it is for gain or manipulation. He is an inside outsider, which leads him act a bit differently than the uniformed and Gov apparatus. He lies for enjoyment, and tells the truth for enjoyment or gainl

The one time I thought he was being unusually forthright was when he told a reporter that 'Putin's Cook' is a misnomer; 'Putin's Butcher' was a more apt description.

Somebody can be a psychopath and quite intelligent or a psychopath and an idiot. Many of the leaders on the Russian side are idiots (at least at military operations), Prigozhin is the exception. He actually is a very good military leader as well as a psychopath.

Prigozhin and Girkin are both Russian patriots, but unlike most of the other Russian leaders, they are realists who state what's really going on rather than making up things to make the Russian military progress sound good.
 
What you call a patriot, I call a murdering war-monger happy to use state sponsored terrorism. One psychopathic mass murderer following the orders of another psychopathic mass murderer [Putin] does not a 'patriot' make.

You can be a patriot and a mass murdering war monger happy to use to use state sponsored terrorism. A patriot being someone who loves their country and wants to advance their countries goals. A patriot doesn't necessarily mean a social-democrat wishing to establish a social-democratic utopia in their country. Or simply a "good person."

It is better to understand your enemy so you can out think him. Rather than simply throwing insults.
 
What's inside Germany's first-ever national security strategy?

Apparently the Russian invasion of Ukraine has gotten Germany to think more about national defense. Are other NATO countries doing the same?

The German government laid out a number of goals in its strategy, which was released on the same day that Germany committed to spending nearly €4 billion to purchase an Arrow 3 air defense system.

The first point was that Germany should reach NATO's two-percent spending target "on a multi-year average" - a longstanding goal which the country repeatedly struggled to achieve prior to the war in Ukraine.

Counterespionage, measures against sabotage and cyber defense are to be strengthened within the country, while defense technology is to be bolstered at the European level, it went on to say.

Furthermore, the paper stated, rules on arms export control are to be standardised across the EU.

The area of defense includes strengthening the Bundeswehr (Germany’s army), civil defense and civil protection, as the paper states. It goes beyond military measures to securing things like clean water supply and medicines in an emergency situation.

Resilience involves defending "our free democratic basic order against illegitimate influence from outside,” it continued.

To this end, "one-sided dependencies in the supply of raw materials and energy" should also be reduced and supply relationships diversified, it said, pointing to an over-dependence on China and - prior to the outbreak of the war in Ukraine - Russia.

In the area of sustainability, the focus is on combating the climate, biodiversity and ecosystem crises, strengthening global food security and global pandemic prevention.
 
Will Denmark and the Netherlands in a combined effort buy 14 more Leopard 2 tanks and send them to UKR? My German is unfortunately pretty bad... Perhaps someone else can verify...

 
  • Like
Reactions: unk45 and madodel
And my Hebrew is non-existent... :cool:

But allegedly...

One Israeli media 'outlet' claims that two countries are buying about ~200+ Merkava 2 and 3 tanks no longer in use by the Israeli Armed Forces. One of those countries is allegedly a European country. The tank has never been exported before, and this could be some kind of Ukrainian purchase, or two other countries that are buying them and then sending them to Ukraine.

A google translate:
The Ministry of Defense does not specify the names of the two countries that agreed to the purchase of more than 200 used Israeli tanks in light of the sensitivity of the process, but the deal is on the verge of a final signature and is expected to be completed within about three months. Officials at the Ministry of Defense told Ynet that because some mechanical parts in these tanks are American-made, especially the engine, approval from the Ministry of Defense in Washington is required to complete the transaction.”
The cost is expected to be tens of millions of dollars, or a few hundred thousand euros per tank – therefore rather cheap compared to various Western tanks. The Merkava Mark 2 has a 105 mm main cannon and the Merkava Mark 3 has a 120 mm (main cannon).

The Merkava is also unique in its design in that it has the engine at the front, which leads to higher survivability for the crew who, in addition to frontal armor, also have an engine between them and the enemy. The drive wheels are therefore located at the front as on an IFV [?]. In addition, there is a modular compartment with a rear door behind the turret, which can either be used as an extended ammunition magazine, to accommodate some troops or for evacuation of wounded from the battlefield.

The Merkava tank is [allegedly] widely considered to have the best crew survivability in the world. A contributing factor is that the rear doors can be used for evacuation backwards if the tank is knocked out.

It's however not certain that these tanks are intended for battle in Ukraine. It could also be that some other European country quickly needs to replace the tanks they have sent to Ukraine.

 
Last edited:
And my Hebrew is non-existent... :cool:

But allegedly...

One Israeli media 'outlet' claims that two countries are buying about ~200+ Merkava 2 and 3 tanks no longer in use by the Israeli Armed Forces. One of those countries is allegedly a European country. The tank has never been exported before, and this could be some kind of Ukrainian purchase, or two other countries that are buying them and then sending them to Ukraine.

A google translate:

The cost is expected to be tens of millions of dollars, or a few hundred thousand euros per tank – therefore rather cheap compared to various Western tanks. The Merkava Mark 2 has a 105 mm main cannon and the Merkava Mark 3 has a 120 mm (main cannon).

The Merkava is also unique in its design in that it has the engine at the front, which leads to higher survivability for the crew who, in addition to frontal armor, also have an engine between them and the enemy. The drive wheels are therefore located at the front as on an IFV [?]. In addition, there is a modular compartment with a rear door behind the turret, which can either be used as an extended ammunition magazine, to accommodate some troops or for evacuation of wounded from the battlefield.

The Merkava tank is [allegedly] widely considered to have the best crew survivability in the world. A contributing factor is that the rear doors can be used for evacuation backwards if the tank is knocked out.

It's however not certain that these tanks are intended for battle in Ukraine. It could also be that some other European country quickly needs to replace the tanks they have sent to Ukraine.

Google Translate understood it like a Talmud scholar. One interesting point is that the US DOD needs to approve the sale, since the tanks contain US components. At least we know that the tanks aren't going to either Russia or North Korea. 🤔
 
And my Hebrew is non-existent... :cool:

But allegedly...

One Israeli media 'outlet' claims that two countries are buying about ~200+ Merkava 2 and 3 tanks no longer in use by the Israeli Armed Forces. One of those countries is allegedly a European country. The tank has never been exported before, and this could be some kind of Ukrainian purchase, or two other countries that are buying them and then sending them to Ukraine.

A google translate:

The cost is expected to be tens of millions of dollars, or a few hundred thousand euros per tank – therefore rather cheap compared to various Western tanks. The Merkava Mark 2 has a 105 mm main cannon and the Merkava Mark 3 has a 120 mm (main cannon).

The Merkava is also unique in its design in that it has the engine at the front, which leads to higher survivability for the crew who, in addition to frontal armor, also have an engine between them and the enemy. The drive wheels are therefore located at the front as on an IFV [?]. In addition, there is a modular compartment with a rear door behind the turret, which can either be used as an extended ammunition magazine, to accommodate some troops or for evacuation of wounded from the battlefield.

The Merkava tank is [allegedly] widely considered to have the best crew survivability in the world. A contributing factor is that the rear doors can be used for evacuation backwards if the tank is knocked out.

It's however not certain that these tanks are intended for battle in Ukraine. It could also be that some other European country quickly needs to replace the tanks they have sent to Ukraine.

This is the tank that is used commonly to argue about the definition of "tank," given it has a rear door like a IFV or APC and can be used to transport troops in a pinch.
 
Zeihan talks about Russian demographics and if Putin will disappear. It doesn't sound very promising for Putin's disappearance. He thinks this war only ends when one side cries uncle.


Zeihan can be a bit over the top sometimes, but in this case I agree with him. When this war ends, it will end in Russia, not Ukraine. If Ukraine has a good run and forces Russia completely off their territory, then the Russians will be left sitting on their side of the border attacking Ukrainian territory, but they will still be fighting until something happens to bring down the Russian system.

One thing when he was talking about the demographics is that Russia never had the expertise to develop oil fields very well. My sister is a petroleum Geologist and she left the major oil companies around 1990 to go work for a small Geology company in town (Bakersfield, CA). The guy who owned the company had been a manager at Occidental and was getting some projects that Oxy didn't have the internal staff to handle.

Occidental was working with the Russians to rehab their oil industry and my sister's company was digitizing and processing the data. It's standard practice that whenever someone drills an oil well, before putting it into production various instruments are dropped down the well and data is collected on the formations and layers surrounding the well. One measure is resistivity of the rock, another sends signals out into the surrounding rock and the return signals are recorded.

Even by the 1980s the technology to do this was fairly common knowledge and even the Soviets did it, but to a standard well below any western company. I saw a bunch of the well logs. They were printed on paper akin to what you would find in a restroom. It may have been restroom paper towel roll. For rubber bands they used cut up bicycle inner tube. Western data collection is all done in one of a handful of standard scales, but these were all scaled to fit the paper.

From analyzing the data my sister concluded that Soviet Geologists didn't know what they were doing, or if they did, they were not allowed by the system to do their job properly. The Russian oil production was in steep decline at that point due to horrible mismanagement of the oil fields. Many of these oil fields had been originally opened up by Occidental Petroleum in the 1920s and 1930s when Occidental was doing a lot of business in the USSR. Armand Hammer who had founded Oxy was a physician in the early USSR and was kicked out by Stalin shortly after Lenin's death. He took with him a lot of Russian state treasures he had acquired and it's how most of the Faberge eggs got to the west.

For decades afterwards the Soviets just drilled more wells in known fields hoping to increase production. The management of the oil reservoirs was terrible.

Even among the graybeards educated before the collapse of the USSR, there is not a lot of oil expertise. Russia would have to get expertise from the west to continue to develop most of their oil plays. China is coming along in its native expertise, but they don't have the sophistication to develop complex plays yet.

What's inside Germany's first-ever national security strategy?

Apparently the Russian invasion of Ukraine has gotten Germany to think more about national defense. Are other NATO countries doing the same?

After WW II the allies basically turned Germany into a pacifist state. Germany's government has hamstrung the military at every turn since the end of the Cold War. This war has forced Germany to wake up to the reality that NATO needs to be strong again.

The Perun video on Germany's military goes into detail about both how bad it is in Germany and why it's that way.

The rest of NATO was fairly complacent putting Europe's defense on the back burner to a large degree, though nobody was as bad as Germany. This war has stirred all of NATO into action and rearming is a high priority for many nations now.

And my Hebrew is non-existent... :cool:

But allegedly...

One Israeli media 'outlet' claims that two countries are buying about ~200+ Merkava 2 and 3 tanks no longer in use by the Israeli Armed Forces. One of those countries is allegedly a European country. The tank has never been exported before, and this could be some kind of Ukrainian purchase, or two other countries that are buying them and then sending them to Ukraine.

A google translate:

The cost is expected to be tens of millions of dollars, or a few hundred thousand euros per tank – therefore rather cheap compared to various Western tanks. The Merkava Mark 2 has a 105 mm main cannon and the Merkava Mark 3 has a 120 mm (main cannon).

The Merkava is also unique in its design in that it has the engine at the front, which leads to higher survivability for the crew who, in addition to frontal armor, also have an engine between them and the enemy. The drive wheels are therefore located at the front as on an IFV [?]. In addition, there is a modular compartment with a rear door behind the turret, which can either be used as an extended ammunition magazine, to accommodate some troops or for evacuation of wounded from the battlefield.

The Merkava tank is [allegedly] widely considered to have the best crew survivability in the world. A contributing factor is that the rear doors can be used for evacuation backwards if the tank is knocked out.

It's however not certain that these tanks are intended for battle in Ukraine. It could also be that some other European country quickly needs to replace the tanks they have sent to Ukraine.


I didn't know Israel had any retired Merkervas. I know they have a lot of M60s in reserve. Pulling those out, rehabbing them, and giving them to Ukraine would have helped the Ukrainians.

The low cost of these tanks tells me that they are being sold as a kind of gift. I strongly suspect they could be going to Ukraine.