nativewolf
Active Member
Uk’s Sunak headed to DC to talk some sense into Biden
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very much begs the question: Where do they run to?Ben Hodges thinks there is the possibility that Russia's troops could just cut and run when the offensive starts. Between the troops having minimal training, poor morale, and the lack of commanders at the battlefield level, I think there is a good chance of this happening.
sVery much begs the question: Where do they run to?
If Ukraine cuts them off, they are stuck on what is essentially a complex peninsula which Ukraine will be slowly shutting down. Russia won't evacuate deserters, I doubt even to prosecute them. There are going to be potentially thousands of Russian soldiers looting the Ukrainian countryside.
Ben Hodges also predicted that Ukraine would leave the Kerch Bridge intact until shortly after the war is over. Again, this is what they did in Kherson. They did not totally cut off Russia's escape route. Russians do not like being encircled. They had many bad experiences with it in WW2.Very much begs the question: Where do they run to?
If Ukraine cuts them off, they are stuck on what is essentially a complex peninsula which Ukraine will be slowly shutting down. Russia won't evacuate deserters, I doubt even to prosecute them. There are going to be potentially thousands of Russian soldiers looting the Ukrainian countryside.
Could be for many tactical reasons. Send cheap drones and force them to use expensive anti air defences. Gather intel about where their anti air is located to avoid them/take them out in future actual strikes. See if it's worth sending more expensive rockets/drones, to attempt to take out Putin or other high value targets. Gather images to find new targets. Force Russia to move around troops as a part of Ukraine's shaping operations.According to Denys Davydov the drone attack on Moscow the drones had no explosives. The few that got through just crashed into a mostly affluent elites neighborhood. It may have just been to show that Moscow can be targeted if someone wants to.
I think this is a good call. But... they can nuke the RR and one side of the bridge. They just need 1/2 of the driving span to walk back to RussiaBen Hodges also predicted that Ukraine would leave the Kerch Bridge intact until shortly after the war is over. Again, this is what they did in Kherson. They did not totally cut off Russia's escape route. Russians do not like being encircled. They had many bad experiences with it in WW2.
SunTzu would say always leave a path of escape because if given a path men will flee. If cornered they may fight to the death. You may hunt and kill the fleeing at your leisure. So, it is an old old adageI think this is a good call. But... they can nuke the RR and one side of the bridge. They just need 1/2 of the driving span to walk back to Russia
Very much begs the question: Where do they run to?
If Ukraine cuts them off, they are stuck on what is essentially a complex peninsula which Ukraine will be slowly shutting down. Russia won't evacuate deserters, I doubt even to prosecute them. There are going to be potentially thousands of Russian soldiers looting the Ukrainian countryside.
Don't make the mistake of others and think that you'll pin or discombobulate the russians to such an extent that that they collapse. They did not collapse in Kherson and they stabalized the front in Kremenia. They turned that 30 mile column stuck outside of Kiev around in 1 day and were back to safety in that 1 day. The southern commanders are the best, the defenses the best organized. Ukraine is, I am sure, counting on slogging the whole way. They are ruthless, determined and have very low rates of desertion/surrender compared to the folks the USA has been fighting post Vietnam. They are also adapting and the leader has bet the nation on this mis adventure.
s
Could be for many tactical reasons. Send cheap drones and force them to use expensive anti air defences. Gather intel about where their anti air is located to avoid them/take them out in future actual strikes. See if it's worth sending more expensive rockets/drones, to attempt to take out Putin or other high value targets. Gather images to find new targets. Force Russia to move around troops as a part of Ukraine's shaping operations.
One major thing that has changed during the war is that Ukraine has set up it's own drone manufacturing operations and they are gathering more and more experiences both in how to use drones in wars but also how to manufacture drones. Russia are not standing still either, but they have a lot of disadvantages with not getting support from the west, sanctions on electronics, losing lots of their high skilled labour who fled the country etc. I expected Ukraine to gain an advantage in drone warfare the longer the war progresses and I think we have been seeing the effects of this over the last months.
Does Ukraine have small drones with that sort of range and still able to carry a decent payload? People bring up the example of the Iranian drone attacks on Kyiv, but Kyiv is much closer to Russian occupied territory and Belarus, so they can be launched at much closer range. Moscow however is much further from the Ukrainian border.Could be for many tactical reasons. Send cheap drones and force them to use expensive anti air defences. Gather intel about where their anti air is located to avoid them/take them out in future actual strikes. See if it's worth sending more expensive rockets/drones, to attempt to take out Putin or other high value targets. Gather images to find new targets. Force Russia to move around troops as a part of Ukraine's shaping operations.
One major thing that has changed during the war is that Ukraine has set up it's own drone manufacturing operations and they are gathering more and more experiences both in how to use drones in wars but also how to manufacture drones. Russia are not standing still either, but they have a lot of disadvantages with not getting support from the west, sanctions on electronics, losing lots of their high skilled labour who fled the country etc. I expected Ukraine to gain an advantage in drone warfare the longer the war progresses and I think we have been seeing the effects of this over the last months.
Does Ukraine have small drones with that sort of range and still able to carry a decent payload? People bring up the example of the Iranian drone attacks on Kyiv, but Kyiv is much closer to Russian occupied territory and Belarus, so they can be launched at much closer range. Moscow however is much further from the Ukrainian border.
It could also be possible these were launched from within Russia, so that would suggest that either there are Russian sympathizers, Ukraine has the ability to penetrate deep into Russian territory undetected (the recent border incursion at Belgrod was not such an example as it was very public), or this is a very 4D chess false flag by Russia (as others pointed out this time official Russian sources were downplaying the attack, which does not match how false flags are usually done, as usually they are overblown to maximize the ultimate goal, much like the flag pole incident, which was made a much bigger deal of even though the effect was much less).
Medvedev seems to have gone off the rails even worse than Putin. All the same, if any third country were involved in any war just to a fraction of the involvement of the US and the UK in the Ukrainian/Russian war, then the US and the UK would see that third country and its representatives as legitimate military targets.Not sure I see the point of his threat. If Russia attacks UK Gov’t officials, doesn't that invoke NATO response?
Not sure I see the point of his threat. If Russia attacks UK Gov’t officials, doesn't that invoke NATO response?
By all accounts Russia is moving mobile reserves from Kremenia to Bahkmut but they ALSO stripped the north to send units south. The attacks on the troop concentrations in Marioupul were units being stripped from Kremenia and sent to the south. NOT the reverse. Russia is reinforcing the south which is EXACTLY what it seems Ukraine wants them to do ..exactly as happened in Kherson. Prediction: Units in south will not break and run. They are the best commanded and leadership will matter. They never broke and ran in Kherson and I don't think they will there, not at first. Some estimates have the south with 150k soldiers. Russia will have a problem concentrating a reserve to reinforce defensive lines with armor but you can bet this will not be a cakewalk.Many may surrender. If the situation in Russia begins to destabilize, the army will need every person they can, even ship the deserters they can catch back to Russia to put down rebellions.
In any case if the Russian troops are fleeing, they aren't manning the defenses giving the Ukrainians free reign to roll up the territory.
The Russians are digging a lot of trenches in the south and they have probably laid a lot of mines, but their positioning of dragon's teeth is pathetically bad. They have also stripped out a number of their best units in the south to send them to Bakhmut. More units are moving now from the south to Belgorod.
The Russians were only able to stabilize Kremina because the Ukrainians ran out of supplies to keep the offensive going.
The Russians have had some successes and they have learned some things, but they have had many more screw ups than successes and their rate of learning and adapting is way worse than Ukraine which has adapted very fast.
Though the latest is that it appears the drones originated from within Russia. Russia has a resistance movement that is circulating underground. I think they were behind the attack on the Kremlin too.
Ukraine will not target Putin. International law prohibits targeting the leader of another country.
What I don’t understand is how can these drones fly unmolested from Ukraine territory.Could be for many tactical reasons. Send cheap drones and force them to use expensive anti air defences. Gather intel about where their anti air is located to avoid them/take them out in future actual strikes. See if it's worth sending more expensive rockets/drones, to attempt to take out Putin or other high value targets. Gather images to find new targets. Force Russia to move around troops as a part of Ukraine's shaping operations.
One major thing that has changed during the war is that Ukraine has set up it's own drone manufacturing operations and they are gathering more and more experiences both in how to use drones in wars but also how to manufacture drones. Russia are not standing still either, but they have a lot of disadvantages with not getting support from the west, sanctions on electronics, losing lots of their high skilled labour who fled the country etc. I expected Ukraine to gain an advantage in drone warfare the longer the war progresses and I think we have been seeing the effects of this over the last months.
What I don’t understand is how can these drones fly unmolested from Ukraine territory.
If not a false flag op, then IMO these had to have been launched from some point inside Russian territory by anti Kremlin sympathizers.