You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Guess based on how the team is betting - we need either Oppenhiemer or Sky is Falling.From DMP on X:
Reaction to ER
GOOD=$221.21/$223.85
GREAT=$229.60
EXPLOSIVE=$237.99
OPPENHEIMER=$248.36/$252.68
NEUTRAL=$214.09/$209.28/$205.38
BAD=$200.55/194.07
TERRIBLE=$182.55/$177.25
SKY IS FALLING=$168.45/$166.93
More people are betting that we go up after ER and the worse is over.Very little put buying coming in for TSLA, anyone else notice that?
Put IV is higher than call for same % OTM.Very little put buying coming in for TSLA, anyone else notice that?
No - FSD is nowhere near close. Its not about having one drive without interventions - but being able to drive for months, if not years without an intervention.make me very cautious about having any CC's below a strike price that I'm truly comfortable getting my shares called away. If Tesla has its' OpenAI moment in the next quarter or two or Wall St decides to flip the script and view Tesla as a AI play, things could run very fast.
For the flow readers I guess this means MM are not expecting TSLA to go up and more likely to go down instead (prices are raised for desirable things and lowered for less desirable)?Put IV is higher than call for same % OTM.
Conspiracy theories aside ... prices depend on buyers / sellers. If one MM tries to play "cute" other MMs will pounce on it.For the flow readers I guess this means MM are not expecting TSLA to go up and more likely to go down instead (prices are raised for desirable things and lowered for less desirable)?
To say FSD is nowhere close when V12 is just rolling out with a completely new architecture that in theory, should advance exponentially faster than the legacy architecture that we've seen for the past 2-3 years is premature IMO.No - FSD is nowhere near close. Its not about having one drive without interventions - but being able to drive for months, if not years without an intervention.
That doesn't mean Wall St will suddenly not wake up one day and think FSD is "solved". Then we'll have a Hetrz/NACS moment ...
There you have it - the reason some might push up the price. I'm in the "show me" category ... but who knows how many are in the excited category on Wall St ?!To say FSD is nowhere close when V12 is just rolling out with a completely new architecture that in theory, should advance exponentially faster than the legacy architecture that we've seen for the past 2-3 years is premature IMO.
How do you get a large % of customers to baby something and monitor closely and pay $200 a month ? Most customers don't care that this is bleeding edge. They want to text, eat, play games ... that is when they will pay $200 a month.It's about when FSD gets good enough that the average consumer is willing to pay $200/month for it or Tesla gets aggressive with adoption by lowering subscription monthly cost.
Understandable and cautious behaviour.I'm in the "show me" category ...
This is why PFOF is worth as much as it is. I could win every auction at Christies if everyone had a little bubble above their head that showed their highest price.Video worth a watch (30 seconds). Relevant to this week:
“Place your entries where the masses place their stops.” —David Paul
Absolutely - thats why I sit out on ER weeks (though I'm thinking of selling 15% OTM options tomorrow before market close).Every ER there's a chance of a surprise, especially after the stock got hammered. That's why I'm holding off on selling calls into tomorrow's ER.
Yeah, thank Dog I was only buying shares and LEAPs back then, made an absolute killing...Understandable and cautious behaviour.
That said, when the stock rallies, it doesn't give warning signs ahead of time. It just goes. Q1 2020 ER comes to mind, nobody saw that coming.
Every ER there's a chance of a surprise, especially after the stock got hammered. That's why I'm holding off on selling calls into tomorrow's ER.
(But I do realise a crazy rally is unlikely since there aren't many
possible surprises. Only improved margins due to lower COGS can provide the necessary jolt IMO)
I'm with you on the "show me" category. But it's very pertinent to look for signs and clues because when Tesla does in fact "show us", the stock will be on a massive rocket higher. I will say....it's very hard to actually try and judge progress because of certain Twitter FSD users that always overhypeThere you have it - the reason some might push up the price. I'm in the "show me" category ... but who knows how many are in the excited category on Wall St ?!
I think there's an an in between crowd. Because you're talking about the consumer base that wants Robotaxi level FSD.How do you get a large % of customers to baby something and monitor closely and pay $200 a month ? Most customers don't care that this is bleeding edge. They want to text, eat, play games ... that is when they will pay $200 a month.
But there is a crowd between what FSD currently is and that Robotaxi crowd. Take a Uber driver. Let's say Tesla can get V12 FSD intervention rates down to rare cases, essentially one intervention per week or one intervention per every 3 days for a high frequency user. At that level of performance, an Uber driver would probably be willing to pay $200/monthly for the comfort and safety of using FSD.
Anyways, what I'm talking about is FSD just getting good enough to materially increase monthly subscription adoption and start a curve for it. Because then it allows Tesla to boast in its earnings 'X' number of monthly subscribers and then show materially QoQ rate adoption increase.
I would like to see some of those studies and evidence of Teslas crashing more because AP is now so much better.The counter-point (and it has been discussed to death elsewhere-and there's tons of studies/evidence on this- and further talk on it belongs elsewhere)- the nearer to 0 intervention, without BEING 0 intervention, an automated system gets, the greater the odds the human stops paying sufficient attention and an accident happens. And while it would still be the humans "fault" that's not traditionally how the narrative on this stuff has gone.
I'd also argue Uber drivers margins are already quite thin so an extra $200/mo is a bit of a lift for them for just L2 ADAS.