Isn't it that capacity comes before the ramp and parts come as needed (X month forecast)?
Last reply on this not to de-rail the thread, but I wasn't talking production capacity, but actual units produced.
I remember this from the model 3 ramp and what I've read about it in Elon's biographies: if you want to produce X numbers of cars per week at a certain timeline, you have to be sure the supply chain(s) will be at level X by then. Trying to time this is why "manufacturing is excruciatingly difficult" (Elon) but for first ramps you have to assume somethings will go wrong with some suppliers and therefore you need them to output X amount of parts a certain time BEFORE your planned production date.
The next-gen pilot line is being designed as we speak at Giga Tesla. They will "produce" test vehicles at very low numbers in the coming 6-12 months and keep improving the manufacturing line, with the end goal of it being largely automated, extremely fast, extremely robust, and easy to copy. By then (or soon after) the Giga Mexico outward shell should be completed, and the line will be copied there (possibly multiple lines), AND in Giga Berlin and Shanghai. The next-gen vehicle will ramp unlike anything we've seen yet with Tesla (at 4 locations), and a mere 18 months can mean the difference between 10/week and 20.000/week.
The timing of all this (start of S-curve) is debatable, but by Q1 2026 we should see production of the next-gen car at multiple locations already. Tick tok tick tok.
To bring it back on topic: right now I'm not LEAP-minded since I can see enough scenarios where the stock stays rangebound ($150-300) for a year.
If by end of 2024 or early 2025 the SP has not exceeded $250-$300 I think I'll build a LEAP position with expiration JAN2027, due to the considerations above. FSD and Bots are pipedreams in the eyes of most institutional investors, but a new car model at ASP $X, profit margins of Y% and a production goal of Z-million units = share price boost.