You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also rolled 02/23 220 -P to 04/19 220 -P for 4.5.Sold 03/28 215CC for 5.
Wasn't expecting it to hit just yet cause it was 0.4 above the bid.
What do you show for probabilities for next Friday?
What do you show for probabilities for next Friday?
If it break 500 why would it stop at 505? CPI? Seem too hot...Today, looks like SPY is controlling, trying to break 500. I'm waiting for it to test it again and then sell calls for next week at 205
For TSLA or overall?Did we come to a conclusion on whether max pain matters or not?
Not quite 196.5 but the RSI did touch 70. The first time it touched 70 on the hourly timeframe from a bottom, TSLA always pulled back and consolidated for a few days.it was a simple retest of the falling wedge. At this stage, gap ups don't hold unless some substantial news causes it, which today none did. Needs time to build up momentum before more impulsive PA can develop. The 1h RSI is 56.8 now. 1st the 15m RSI reaches 70 (196 last week), then it fell some more before a stronger bounce, then the 1H RSI reaches 70 (should happen around 196 this week), then the consolidation begins. At least that's the scenario I'm looking for.
View attachment 1016181
i have mp raw data since 2021, dunno what to analyze yetI’m surprised with this type of available data that @Yoona hasn’t already done something like this as at least as a back test thought exercise to test their internal H200’s. ;-)
Guess that 1-1.3% of max pain no longer hold true? Was thinking of the same but Tesla been straying quite far from MP lately. Maybe just for Tesla but not sure how it hold off for other stocks.For TSLA or overall?
Overall, no question it matters, it’s just a function of how much, how often and random direct events or lack of event predictability.
Before there was NVDA, before there was TSLA (the original Mac daddy of derivative manipulation) there was AAPL. Over several years more than a decade ago i found that I could sell ever increasingly narrow IC within 1-1.3% of max pain closing price for regular expirations. This was long before 0DTE and even weekly expirations. Seasonal events like earnings, WWDC, even CES could impact things so I stayed away from those event horizons. But, it was a winning strategy WELL above 60% (I won’t put the actual number out there).
I’m surprised with this type of available data that @Yoona hasn’t already done something like this as at least as a back test thought exercise to test their internal H200’s. ;-)
But coming spot on or so close with such regularity is something that the machines certainly see, and take advantage of. Remember, being “the house” pretty much means you’re a seller or a seller more than half of the time.
Yeah, it’s not that it’s always 1-1.3 (and that reference was for AAPL) but that the predictability of the delta from MP on the closing Friday was predictable within that range. And again, that was AAPL. and frankly back at those times that WAS the difference between the MP target and the closing price. but for TSLA, now, what we’ve seen is an UNDERSHOOT of MP, but it’s been a predictable undershoot within X%.. Will one get an OVERSHOOT at some point - for sure. but the forward looking predictability is highly correlated if not causelated (that’s not a word)Guess that 1-1.3% of max pain no longer hold true? Was thinking of the same but Tesla been straying quite far from MP lately. Maybe just for Tesla but not sure how it hold off for other stocks.
MM would have would have seen it miles aways and wouldnt make it that easy for the sellers now......IMO.
MM ARE THE SELLERS.Guess that 1-1.3% of max pain no longer hold true? Was thinking of the same but Tesla been straying quite far from MP lately. Maybe just for Tesla but not sure how it hold off for other stocks.
MM would have would have seen it miles aways and wouldnt make it that easy for the sellers now......IMO.
It’s not a fix though, it’s a derivative of the derivatives..No need to directly "fix" the SP and introduce more risks.