stealthology
Member
Agree. The much larger issue is how many S+X are delivered. The mix matters, but MUCH less. any X>0 will do for most market reaction scenarios. Everyone knows the volume is in 2016, so as long as the story is "The X is ramping" the number doesn't matter much. As Elon said, with an exponential curve a little bit of shift in the X axis really affects the area under the curve (paraphrasing). I think people understand this. The other thing the market will care about, that we don't even talk about any more is EPS. If the capex spending is down, it will quiet the "cash burn" narrative which is keeping a lid on the stock price.
Thank you for your thoughts. Didn't Tesla basically tell Credit Suisse earlier this month that its "gross margins are disappointing and below what the company thinks they can be" (link)? Tesla did sandwich that bit of info right after re-stating that they expect to reach several hundred X's/week sometime in Dec, that they "should hit their 17K delivery forecast for Q4", and that they expect the S to reach top market-share position in Europe for the first time in its price segment.
Was Tesla potentially getting us ready for a lower EPS for Q4? I'm sure that costs in Q4 were pretty decent to get ready for the X. From the last Q3 call, Elon said cash-flow positive is their aspiration in Q1-- which is probably when they'll have less CapEx for sure and much more sales with the X ramp-up. Anyone have thoughts on this?