You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As I posted here:A flight instructor teaches Tesla Autopilot, in a critical flight situation (the autopilot is flying an approach to landing, close to the ground), airline pilots monitor the performance of the autopilot with great vigilance and remain ready to take over in a moment's notice if the operation is not progressing properly. Thus, "Autopilot" remains an appropriate word for describing Tesla's system. Consumers Report fails to understand that even in a modern jetliner, autopilot operations sometimes fail and the autopilot needs to be carefully monitored during critical situations (such as on approach and close to the ground). Consumers' Report is incorrect in criticizing Tesla for using the word "Autopilot" because CR really doesn't understand the need to monitor an autopilot's performance in aircraft.
New York utility turns to DERs to avoid $11.8M substation upgrade
This is the sort of opportunity that a combined Tesla Energy - SolarCity could really go into. A utility wants a DER alternative to a $11.8M substation upgrade. Think of the substation as a microgrid. Tesla brings in a combination of Powerpacks and behind the meter solar and Powerwalls. All systems within the substation communicate and coordinate to manage peak loads on the substation, voltage regulation, and backup with islanding capability. The utility gets an aggregated interface to the microgrid. Problem solved at minimal cost to utility and all ratepayers.
As I posted here:A flight instructor teaches Tesla Autopilot, in a critical flight situation (the autopilot is flying an approach to landing, close to the ground), airline pilots monitor the performance of the autopilot with great vigilance and remain ready to take over in a moment's notice if the operation is not progressing properly. Thus, "Autopilot" remains an appropriate word for describing Tesla's system. Consumers Report fails to understand that even in a modern jetliner, autopilot operations sometimes fail and the autopilot needs to be carefully monitored during critical situations (such as on approach and close to the ground). Consumers' Report is incorrect in criticizing Tesla for using the word "Autopilot" because CR really doesn't understand the need to monitor an autopilot's performance in aircraft.
hmmm. ok. Like a somewhat DRIP. a few free shares. a 1 time opportunity.I presume so that if the merger goes through at the bottom end of the deal, you still end up with your 100 TSLA at the end of the day.
Sure that works too. It depends on how much cash you want to take out. I was thinking that it would be nice to hold the expected gain as cash because that gives you other trading options about how to deploy that cash, while not fundamentally changing your longtermTesla-SolarCity position. For example, if the price of either stock was attacked and became a buying opportunity, you'd have the cash to do that.@jhm am curious, why not sell the 100 TSLA and get 860 shares SCTY? as more or less even trade? (or ~92-93 shares TSLA and 820 SCTY) (i usually DCA equities)
As I posted here:A flight instructor teaches Tesla Autopilot, in a critical flight situation (the autopilot is flying an approach to landing, close to the ground), airline pilots monitor the performance of the autopilot with great vigilance and remain ready to take over in a moment's notice if the operation is not progressing properly. Thus, "Autopilot" remains an appropriate word for describing Tesla's system. Consumer Reports fails to understand that even in a modern jetliner, autopilot operations sometimes fail and the autopilot needs to be carefully monitored during critical situations (such as on approach and close to the ground). Consumer Reports is incorrect in criticizing Tesla for using the word "Autopilot" because CR really doesn't understand the need to monitor an autopilot's performance in aircraft.
While true, it was still a poor name choice because the general public does not have this understanding. Unfortunately, people choose to believe the wrong meaning for words when used in the wrong context and, over time, that becomes the accepted understanding of the word. See also how the word 'troll' gets thrown around this tread. Most people using that word don't know what 'troll' really means in the context of an online community.
So what's with the whack back down to neutral and subsequent flat ??
2/10. Would not read again. We know what a troll is and we do know how the the term "auto pilot" has been used for decades in the airline industry.
You do, the average public does not. The average poster in this thread is far more educated than the average person.
Last weekend, I tried being an Uber driver on Saturday out of curiosity. I did 3 drives with 4 passengers in the Phoenix area. None of them had any idea what car I was driving (Model S). 3 of them asked me about it. I explained it was a Tesla and electric with no gasoline. One woman asked me who makes Tesla... Ford?
That was 4 days ago in Phoenix.
The terms virtual power plant, microgrid and nanogrid are all interrelated. I think the key difference is in the basic problem one is focused on. If power generation is the primary issue, then VPP is your aggregated solution. If net power consumption is your concern, nanogrid is the word. If managing a local grid and enabling islanding, then microgrid. But in reality all these perspectives overlap. You can use aggregated nanogrids to form a virtual microgrid or power plant. Whatever you call it. Tesla Energy wants to be smack in the middle of it.this kinda sounds like a VPP (Virtual Power Plant) nice little info here which includes Tesla and Powerwalls How utilities can prepare for the invasion of the Virtual Power Plants
Please don't think that the average US citizen, from Arizona or otherwise, is in any way representative of the average global TSLA investor or Tesla owner. Because that's what matters here and now isn't it? What does the average Tesla owner know and understand? What does the average TSLA investor know and understand?
No, I think here Takata is actually the bigger loser than auto makers (they got to bear the cost, I guess).
Please don't think that the average US citizen, from Arizona or otherwise, is in any way representative of the average global TSLA investor or Tesla owner. Because that's what matters here and now isn't it? What does the average Tesla owner know and understand? What does the average TSLA investor know and understand?
I'm not talking about investors. I'm talking about the public and news reporters. People that are not Tesla or TSLA owners and probably don't understand that AutoPilot does not mean the car fully drives itself. That is EXACTLY what people think when they hear the term AutoPilot. I've been asked about my car driving itself multiple times. I've had people say it would be great for going out drinking and not having to get a taxi or uber, just get in the back seat and let the car drive home, etc. People, on average, do not know what AutoPilot really means.
It's not. They don't own any of the data they scrape and most of the auto manufacturers they work with restrict commingling their data with other auto makers so they can't aggregate their data. As the semi crash and the sighting of the Tesla with Lidar show, there is likely a hybrid sensor/Lidar solution for autonomous driving, leaving Mobileye with some cheap sensors and algorithms. Way overrated.In this point of view, MBLY seems like a better investment than Tesla, doesn't it?