Yep, oil investors tend to lust after military drama to boost the price of oil.
But this too is a good opportunity to see how unprecedented oil storage capacity moderates the impact of military strife.
Suppose a military conflict were to shut down 3 or 4 mb/d of oil supply. The spot price of oil would jump up to $50 or more. This would motivate producers to drill faster. This accelerated drilling would bring more supply to market a year later. The storage investors will soak up the price boost in the short run. 3 billion barrels in storage drawn down 3 mb/d is sufficient for 1000 days. This is plenty time for oil producers to bring an extra 3 mb/d of supply to market. There is really no need for the price of oil to go back to $100 unless the futures market goes haywire and places $100 spot price in contango with futures rising to $160 or so. This was the sort of situation that drove the price of oil to $147 in 2008, but it also lead to a monumental price crash within a year. So producers really should not lust after that kind of price action. It is better just to recognize that a 3 billion barrel inventory gives producers about 3 years to bring add 3mb/d of supply to market. The military catalyst that triggered the whole thing could also resolve in that time frame too.
Obviously the market is going to go through whatever craziness that it will. The question for investors is how to play that. I suspect that oil storage hedge investors stand to make the most money off this enormous glut. They buy up cheap inventory and lock in profitable futures. If the price of oil in 2.25 years is still $30, but you sold a $43 contract, you're making money even while the rest of the industry is still going bankrupt. If some sort of military disruption drives oil over $100 spot and futures jump to $200, you lock in that future price and store oil. Volatility in the market is actually your friend.
One other thing I would add is that as oil producers default and go bankrupt, banks will wind up owning oil wells. Banks are smart enough to work through the financial option of placing the output of these wells into storage and they've got the financial means to do so. They know that this surplus supply needs to be taken out of the market for a few years. Indeed, one of the better workouts for an oil producer in default is for the bank to take produced inventory in lieu of payments and place that inventory into storage. The oil industry might not like this because they would prefer other oil producers to capitulate so they can get back to making lots of money. Massive storage minimizes capitulation and dampens future opportunities for surviving producers. So producers might not like the banks putting inventory away into storage, but banks will prefer not to take massive losses on bad loans and are incredibly patient making boring money.