I actually haven't followed the Aramco IPO, not even 1% of what's out there on it. I try to avoid conspiracy theory stuff like the plague.
I simply don't subscribe to the idea that Saudi Arabia is trying to boost oil prices so that it can IPO Aramco. My analysis leads me to believe that oil prices would have increased throughout the remainder of the decade, regardless of whether November 2016 production cuts happened or not.
I think production cuts (and OPEC) serve to prevent extreme drops in oil prices (for example, sub-$40 oil throughout 2016/17), which if not prevented, would lead to extreme spikes just a few years later. Some say, and I agree, that substantial underinvestment in long-cycle oil production throughout the late 90's is what led to the large price spikes of 2007/08.
The damage sub-$50 oil prices did to long-cycle oil investments over the last three years is already historic (just look at the insanely depressed valuation multiples of offshore drillers), and I'm worried about where oil prices will be in 2019/20 and through 2025.
Wall Street plowed money to U.S. shale solely based on wellhead costs, only to find out that shale is in fact unprofitable when full-cycle costs (i.e. land lease, G&A, etc) are considered. The tide, however, is now turning as investors face the reality of very high decline rates of shale plays.
Upcoming increase in oil prices is the primary reason why I think even Tesla is underestimating the future demand for its products, and why I believe today's Manga news are positive:
Tesla Might Team With Magna For Model 3 Production In Europe