dk10438
Member
I didn't acknowledge your single example because it was so asinine. Every Tesla car has a window so it doesn't need to be listed. It's part of the base configuration so when it's already part of the MVPA. Options are obviously optional and the purchaser can add them to the base if they want to pay additional money.Yes, you did ignore every example I cited.
>MVPA lists the car and all the additional options which cost additional money and if you didn't pay for the options, they don't belong to you.
This is legally incorrect. MVPA lists the car as you purschased it, but does not list all options. For example, your window glass isn't on there. Delivery is a 2-way street, which is why you should inspect and insist Tesla fix the many things they screw up, and Tesla should inspect and make sure they've priced their product appropriately and delivered what they thought they were selling. Tesla's poor QC is why you're having trouble defending their mistakes.
here's another example for you: If you believe what you're claiming, you believe Tesla can legally steal Autopilot from every 2014 Autopilot equipped car in existence, as well as from months of 2015 autopilott equipped cars. Why? Because nobody knew what Autopilot was. Tesla didn't put it on the MVPA; they were trying to sell inventory cars and didn't have Autopilot ready so it wasn't mentioned or listed. Making it perfectly legal to steal right now, right?
Why is it legal for Tesla to steal Autopilot from every 2014 Model S ever made? Because it wasn't on the MVPA like you claim?
I would never let Tesla file my Taxes and I don't recommend you do it either; they are not trustworthy and would probably screw up your finances even worse than you've already suggested you believe they already will.
Since you believe the MVPA is non binding and the configuration of the car as it leaves the lot now belongs to the purchaser, I'd like to know your thoughts on this. Say the purchaser elected to have option "X" enabled. He's so excited about the car he doesn't check to see if it's turned on. Several months he realizes option X isn't enabled. This is the reverse of what we've been arguing. Are you saying the purchaser isn't entitled to option X cuz he forgot to test it before delivery and now it's tough crap? By your argument, the car left the lot and both the purchaser and seller agreed to the sale so he's not entitled to option X or the money he paid for it.