Snippiness 2.0

[MXLRplus]

Are you sure about that? The rest of your post makes that assertion very difficult to believe.

Yes I'm sure. Now stop cutting across my lawn dang kids.

 

[Nickage87]

I suggest you stick with the units used throughout the world instead of making up your own.

I suggest you keep your suggestion to yourself. I am not going to explain unit details, everyone understands the reference.

 

[jbcarioca]

If you approach the Service Center with courtesy and respect then the probability of a positive outcome increases. If your approach is to use emotional outbursts to force your way then you will rarely achieve the outcome you are seeking.

That is true. Of course you must actually own a Tesla in order to do that. The OP probably does not own one, else he might explain what his problems are. Most likely his problem is that he has no Tesla Model X and wants one.

 

[gigawatt1010]

That is true. Of course you must actually own a Tesla in order to do that. The OP probably does not own one, else he might explain what his problems are. Most likely his problem is that he has no Tesla Model X and wants one.

Agree.

 

[Dan Wang]

Highway18, I don’t know why you disagree. It’s a fact.

 

[SammichLover]

Uber was definitely wrong. Tesla, however, are quite likely directly caused more deaths (by possibly saving many more at the same time, as many would argue). This is complicated.

LOL, the FUD imaginings runs deep with you.

 

[SammichLover]

I understand that you want to feel good for your FSD purchase, it is fine )

I feel Ok for my FSD purchase. Just for different reasons.

...and with that vapid non-sequitur you're waving a mea culpa flag, in a trying to save face way, that that linked post of yours was pretty dumb?

 

[SammichLover]

Haha. This is funny. As I explained earlier (a few pages back), Tesla is playing FOMO game by increasing FSD prices (they will only go up, probably 100,000$ even). Only real competition can fix that. Which is not on the horizon. So I guess we’are stuck with Tesla games for quite some time. At that point, being FSD owner, I don’t care. I don’t need FSD. I have it, yes. But will not buy it in a future Tesla. For me this is really a toy, not an actual product. And quite expensive one. And the one I will keep playing for as long as I keep my current M3.

So are you summoning up the the courage to acknowledge your post was really dumb, then? Or does your pride still stand in the way?

As for FOMO and price rises. Uh, "setting a higher price for better features, when there's no competition" is inherently FOMO, now?

Yet another term you don't actually grasp.

 

[run-the-joules]

Y’all wanna quit flirting with each other so we can get back to concentrating on how Tesla is screwing everyone?

 

[SergeyUser]

So are you summoning up the the courage to acknowledge your post was really dumb, then? Or does your pride still stand in the way?

As for FOMO and price rises. Uh, "setting a higher price for better features, when there's no competition" is inherently FOMO, now?

Yet another term you don't actually grasp.

I call it FOMO because of Tesla is not saying what *exactly* will FSD be comprised of. Just “much better”. If Tesla listed exact features, it would be fine. Not just “autosteer on city streets”. This is very ambigous.

And No, my message is still not “dumb” to me.

 

[SammichLover]

I call it FOMO because of Tesla is not saying what *exactly* will FSD be comprised of. Just “much better”. If Tesla listed exact features, it be fine. Not just “autosteer on city streets”. This is very ambigous.

So making sure not to overpromise the short-term, because frankly they don't know yet exactly what they'll be able to do and how it'll appear to the user?

Yeah, you've got just as strong a grasp on FOMO as "feature complete". LOL

And No, my message is still not “dumb” to me.

You should probably stop arguing against it and pretending you never made it, then.

 

[SammichLover]

Is this a serious question? Maybe I should have just said “it sucks” instead of putting a number to it. Does that make you feel better?

It is a very serious question. I'm trying to understand if you live in some sort of weird bubble of Posted Limit errors, you've got a curious oddball methodology (that plus #1 could get you to 40% in parts of West Texas, for example), or you're just making up a BS number driven by some vague collection of feels.

Given your response the smart money is #3, meaning roughly zippo credibility. At least "it sucks" would be more honestly subjective.

 

[SergeyUser]

So making sure not to overpromise the short-term, because frankly they don't know yet exactly what they'll be able to do and how it'll appear to the user?

So being vague is a proper way to not over-promise, this is what you are saying in a nutshell?

 

[pdx_m3s]

It is a very serious question. I'm trying to understand if you live in some sort of weird bubble of Posted Limit errors, you've got a curious oddball methodology (that plus #1 could get you to 40% in parts of West Texas, for example), or you're just making up a BS number driven by some vague collection of feels.

Given your response the smart money is #3, meaning roughly zippo credibility. At least "it sucks" would be more honestly subjective.

OK man. I am not going to argue with you. You clearly have way more time to argue FSD than most here.

 

[SammichLover]

OK man. I am not going to argue with you. You clearly have way more time to argue FSD than most here.

Good choice. Thank you. Glad you’ll not further waste our time, because that’s what my question was really about.

“Are you here to contribute to understanding or are you wasting our time with nonsense ranting drivel?”

 

[SammichLover]

To answer some basic questions like:
1. Will car be able to make turns on intersections in a city?
2. Will car attempt to avoid potholes?
3. Drive in non-GPS environments like underground parking garages?

*facepalm*

Not even asking about timeline, sure......Somethink like that.

With no timeline? Oh that's not vague. /s ROLF

 

[Mtnrunner]

MX, thank you for your lecture, but you more or less backed up my statement. eBikes are not considered motorcycles legally. My point is, they should be. They have no place on trails that do not already allow motorized vehicles. There is zero difference between a "motorized cycle" that uses a battery and one that uses an ICE. That is simply common sense. Mopeds have been around for about a century I believe, and they are not allowed on trails even though they can be limited to 20mph easily. There is no logical or operational difference between a moped and an ebike. It's just marketing and lobbying smoke and mirrors.

Things like whether an ebike pollutes more or less than whatever else, or whether a handicapped person needs one, or whether some overweight person will be deprived of a cheated bike ride up some hill are irrelevant, the only question is whether motorized bikes should have access to trails that are reserved for non-motorized traffic -- they should not in my opinion. I don't expect to sway you or any other ebike fan but I'm OK with that.

And your I’ll informed opinion is duly noted. Jees, Tesla owners can be full of it too apparently. Have ever ridden a pedal assist bike? Have you ever seen one? Do you bike at all? Guessing no on all counts.

 

[Mtnrunner]

You're not only an arrogant turd, you're dead wrong on all counts. gfy.

Totally compelling arguments. The GFY was especially poignant. I suppose I’ll need to re-evaluate my opinion on this matter /facepalm

 

[Batt Car]

Wow. They should give people an IQ test before giving out a drivers license, let alone sell someone a high tech car like a Tesla. Stupid people deserve less. Someone show this guy the short bus.

 

[SammichLover]

there's really no right or wrong opinion.

Here's the thing, when an opinion is laid out with an irrational chain of thought and underpinned by inaccurate claims of fact, as yours was, it isn't so much "wrong" as it is just garbage.

Please keep outlining facts or specific features of the car,

You should actually read my post? The whole thing. Multiple corrections of fact, trying to sort out the irrational mess you made stringing (and not stringing) those erroneous facts together, relevant facts you missed/disregarded/forgot about/didn't know/didn't fit what you wanted to believe. Plenty of substance there in my post, as opposed to your post here that just complains about me not doing something that I actually did.

You ignoring it doesn't mean I didn't do it, nor does my single sentence summation at the end about what a HORRIBLE, misguided mess your post was.

P.S. Double Bad Fail for using "Tesla fanboy".