I'm feeling lucky -- trimmed some speculative shares (i.e., non-core holdings) at $202.50. Not quite the tippy-top, but close enough. Now, just need to time redeploying that capital back in.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm feeling lucky -- trimmed some speculative shares (i.e., non-core holdings) at $202.50. Not quite the tippy-top, but close enough. Now, just need to time redeploying that capital back in.
Probably long-dated call / LEAPS, and probably not until after the earnings call. The IV is placing a huge premium on calls right now that I expect will moderate after the ER. Of course, I may be missing out on some big upside after the ER, but I still have a substantial long position. I'm happy to hear clever ideas from others, though.
Probably long-dated call / LEAPS, and probably not until after the earnings call. The IV is placing a huge premium on calls right now that I expect will moderate after the ER. Of course, I may be missing out on some big upside after the ER, but I still have a substantial long position. I'm happy to hear clever ideas from others, though.
I haven't done anything further out than march lately the iv is way too high right now. I'm planning on selling half my near term before the ER if we go much higher than this. If we don't then just selling 1/4. Then after the iv collapses the next day I want to move most of my short term to long term. I hope that's a good strategy. I'm still a noob at options so we shall see.
I sold 1/3 of my Feb22 165s and 170s today when we topped $202. That was my break even point. I will be watching pre ER, if we spike up to over 206 (arbitrary number) before ER 1/3 more will go. I have no basis for this plan. But I am someone that has to have a plan.
I have several deep ITM Jan15 LEAPS and my core stock holding that I plan on keeping unless a very negative catalyst occurs.
Besides, I need to do my taxes and I think the government is going to be looking for some money from me
I honestly don't think there will be much of a drop due to this story... the shorts are running out of ammo. Remember the adapter "recall" news that came out after the stock jumped ~$15 after NAIAS? It did basically nothing... if anything it reinforced the superiority of Tesla over how other manufacturers do recalls. This fire didn't have anything to do with the Tesla since it was apparently untouched by the fire (the electrical parts and battery anyway)... it could have been faulty wiring, arson, or maybe the ICE that was parked next to it.
The thing is though, it has already been repeated once and the general public is not going to call to confirm it like people here have. And people tend to panic quickly. I do agree with you though and it's obvious that the article is very poorly written. It's just that some people might panic and cascading through some tight stops could happen.
The thing is though, it has already been repeated once and the general public is not going to call to confirm it like people here have. And people tend to panic quickly. I do agree with you though and it's obvious that the article is very poorly written. It's just that some people might panic and cascading through some tight stops could happen.
The fact that Tesla offered to cover costs, and that the owner refused are both a little puzzling. The former implies either a ridiculous level of customer service... or some sense of possibly contributing to the problem. The latter could be any of. "No, don't be silly, it's my fault. No, you've already done enough for me, and by the way, the car is awesome. No, there was minimal damage. Or, more ominously, No way, Jose, I'll see you in court. Or: No way, I'm not going to be bought off, I'm going to the media with this."
Would love to know the full story. Until there's a little more clarity, I'm guessing we'll be off $10+ tomorrow. (and I hereby rename myself Irrational Pessimist.)
The fact that Tesla offered to cover costs, and that the owner refused are both a little puzzling. The former implies either a ridiculous level of customer service... or some sense of possibly contributing to the problem. The latter could be any of. "No, don't be silly, it's my fault. No, you've already done enough for me, and by the way, the car is awesome. No, there was minimal damage. Or, more ominously, No way, Jose, I'll see you in court. Or: No way, I'm not going to be bought off, I'm going to the media with this."
Would love to know the full story. Until there's a little more clarity, I'm guessing we'll be off $10+ tomorrow. (and I hereby rename myself Irrational Pessimist.)
The thing is though, it has already been repeated once and the general public is not going to call to confirm it like people here have. And people tend to panic quickly. I do agree with you though and it's obvious that the article is very poorly written. It's just that some people might panic and cascading through some tight stops could happen.