dhanson865
Well-Known Member
Like I said, no evidence they are being used in production...
Yeah, that’s what I was referring to when I said we had anecdotal evidence for lasers being used.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like I said, no evidence they are being used in production...
Yeah, that’s what I was referring to when I said we had anecdotal evidence for lasers being used.
Right, I don't think we have confirmation that Starlink is even using the laser links in production right now, although there is anecdotal evidence here and there.
Rx power levels vs obstructions and line of sight aren't ideal. Uplink power is also an issue for direct to Starlink Satellites.Now that's interesting. Satellite capability in mobile phones would perform better than cel towers if it utilized Starlink, no more need for tower coverage and such a phone would work pretty much anywhere with satellite coverage overhead. Which in time will be the entire world for Starlink.
Very interesting...wouldn't really impact Tesla stock much though, its more SpaceX related.
Yep, it seems like it could work out great. T-Mobile could provide ground stations at sites it currently has a cell tower/Internet connection with just some additional equipment being installed, and Starlink could provide backhaul for remote cell towers that can't easily get an Internet connection. (Maybe it will help with the congestion some users are experiencing where there isn't enough ground station capacity for the number of Starlink Dishys in the area.)T-Mobile bought out my old provider Sprint and things seem better.
Starlink backhaul direct to cell towers would allow better cellular coverage pretty much everywhere. And potentially exit nodes for Starlink where the towers are on the terrestrial backbone.
There was a previous Starship/Starlink presentation where Elon called out behind the sceens talks with cellular providers.
Yep, it seems like it could work out great. T-Mobile could provide ground stations at sites it currently has a cell tower/Internet connection with just some additional equipment being installed, and Starlink could provide backhaul for remote cell towers that can't easily get an Internet connection. (Maybe it will help with the congestion some users are experiencing where there isn't enough ground station capacity for the number of Starlink Dishys in the area.)
It will be interesting to see the details they release.
Baffling. Starlink has made a huge difference in my life since we got it a year and a half ago. Hope this doesn't result in degraded service.Backlash from the FCC commissioner:
View attachment 844637
View attachment 844638
View attachment 844639
If I were betting, I would bet that SpaceX / T-mobile announce that Starlink will provide cell-tower backhaul for very remote locations, allowing T-mobile to expand their footprint much further.
I don't expect a sat phone, someone would have found that in FCC testing filings, and frankly the antenna requirements to make a good sat phone mean that you aren't getting a slim and pretty phone.
NOTE - before anyone jumps on the "there isn't enough bandwidth to backhaul cell towers" - I'm speaking ONLY of remote locations, not towers that have access to good fiber (which will always be superior to LEO satellites).
Could use fiber connected cell towers as endpoints also, increasing the space to terrestrial bandwidth.
Phone - tower - sat (laser link relay if needed) - tower - backbone
Absolutely. Basically, many many more ground stations. Although these become somewhat less valuable in the future when sat to sat lasers are in place (except for the final hop to terrestrial).
More and more Starlink customers lining up.