You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks pretty close to the press kit specs for Standard Range @ 155 miles in 30 minutes (his timestamp is in the bottom left corner)
V3 Superchargers will help all cars in busy environments by allowing dedicated charging up to the max amperage the car requests. Whether the SR battery will accept more than the 145kW output of a V2 Supercharger is not yet confirmed. ORBW will definitely help either way.Will the improved v2 charging and the new v3 charging help the SR+ at all then? I guess the on-route battery heating will help a bit, but apart from that?
V3 Superchargers will help all cars in busy environments by allowing dedicated charging up to the max amperage the car requests. Whether the SR battery will accept more than the 145kW output of a V2 Supercharger is not yet confirmed. ORBW will definitely help either way.
Does this M3 have the update that would allow the increased charging speed? The LR was capped about 120KW before if I’m not mistaken.
Looks pretty close to the press kit specs for Standard Range @ 155 miles in 30 minutes (his timestamp is in the bottom left corner)
At a very high level, the battery charge rate is limited by three things:Are you confident that the SR+ will accept even the 145 kW of the v2? And if so - based on what, since many seem to suggest it will not even reach 120 kW?
Traveling at a leisurely pace, plan to use 5kWh to get from Tehachapi to Mojave. That's about 10% for an SR+. If you have less than ~15% when you get to Tehachapi, I recommend stopping at the ChargePoint J1772 station in Tehachapi for a few minutes to make sure you can get to Mojave.
Something like: 230 / 211 / 194 miHow much range do you expect a SR+ to get going 70/75/80 mph?
If I go 75 tops with cruise control I should make Mojave (180mi) easy then.Something like: 230 / 211 / 194 mi
Ignoring weather and 3000’ elevation gain.If I go 75 tops with cruise control I should make Mojave (180mi) easy then.
Yes, SR charging at 145kW is ~50% higher c-rate than LR charging at 145kW. Therefore more amps into each cell, more heat output on a per cell basis, and more "stress". Also SR would have more restrictive battery temperature requirements to charge at that rate.Wouldn’t that put more stress on the sr+ cells?
With more corroborating reports like this, it's certainly seems that the current SR charge profile is limited to 102 kW.Drove (SR+) pretty hard for an hour or so, around 140km/h. Got it down to 19%. Plugged into supercharger and max was briefly 102kW.
Ambient temp was around 15 Celsius.
Charge went pretty much the same as that vid.
Yes, SR charging at 145kW is ~50% higher c-rate than LR charging at 145kW. Therefore more amps into each cell, more heat output on a per cell basis, and more "stress". Also SR would have more restrictive battery temperature requirements to charge at that rate.
With more corroborating reports like this, it's certainly seems that the current SR charge profile is limited to 102 kW.
I don't know why it's only 102kW now, so I'm not sure if it would keep the same 85% of 145kW with an updated charging profile. But probably not as 145kW is stall limitation not a car limit.Thanks for the answer.
I guess 102 kW would already be more than 67% percent of the 120 kW (85% actually).
But, following your line of thought, why would SR+ be capped at 102 kW now and not just accepting 120 kW?
And why dont you think that it will just keep the current percentage and charge at 85% of the 145 kW on the v2?
Are there no reports from any SR+ owners with the v2 update yet? Has it not been widely rolled out yet?
Not that it matters yet, but I have a trip planned and my route will have me supercharging at 10% after driving 170 miles next weekend. First time at a supercharger so I will be recording. SW ver 2019.8.5