dgpcolorado
high altitude member
And Tesla calls grey (or gray) "Midnight Silver"! Huh? At least the now-discontinued "Titanium" had a cool name.... I don't think Grey is.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And Tesla calls grey (or gray) "Midnight Silver"! Huh? At least the now-discontinued "Titanium" had a cool name.... I don't think Grey is.
Right now we are just trying to keep Tableau operational. Only Big Earl can update right now as I'm traveling and have been unable to get it working after doing an update on my laptop.Here's another strange idea for badges in the game:
What about an "Anti-leader" badge? It would be a calculation, which off the top I realize may be difficult in the current environment. But as we said in my previous position, you get what you pay for and I'm just here to throw spaghetti at the wall.
The calc would look at the North American leader, currently Plus EV, and compare his sites visited to all the other NA game participants. Ones that are duplicated aren't counted for the other competitors. What does count are sites that they have visited that the leader hasn't. The competitor with the most unique sites they've visited that the leader hasn't is the anti-leader.
Example: Leader visited A, B, C, D, E
Competitor 1 visited, A, C, E
Competitor 2 visited B, C, X
Count for C1 = 0 and Count for C2 = 1. Competitor 2 is the anti-leader.
Why - Kind of encourages all competitors to get out and grab the new sites that come up since that's most likely what the current leaders don't have.
And it's kind of fun that your score isn't entirely determined by your effort; it'll change when the leaders get out and about again.
But I realize the inherent difficulty in the calculation as the leader may change and the filter needs to be applied to all participants. You could also do it for Europe.
Again, it's just an idea so no agita intended for offering it up.
Wait, Plus EV's NOT the leader in Europe too?What about an "Anti-leader" badge?
The calc would look at the North American leader, currently Plus EV, and compare his sites visited
You could also do it for Europe.
Whenever - or never. Only wanted to document it for posterity.Right now we are just trying to keep Tableau operational. Only Big Earl can update right now as I'm traveling and have been unable to get it working after doing an update on my laptop.
Without doing the calculations, looking at @PLUS EV 's unvisited map I'm pretty sure it is @Bredo globally and @Bighorn US/Canada. @JSergeant had a shot at US/Canada if he had cleared the northeast before moving to the northwest.Here's another strange idea for badges in the game:
What about an "Anti-leader" badge? It would be a calculation, which off the top I realize may be difficult in the current environment. But as we said in my previous position, you get what you pay for and I'm just here to throw spaghetti at the wall.
The calc would look at the North American leader, currently Plus EV, and compare his sites visited to all the other NA game participants. Ones that are duplicated aren't counted for the other competitors. What does count are sites that they have visited that the leader hasn't. The competitor with the most unique sites they've visited that the leader hasn't is the anti-leader.
Example: Leader visited A, B, C, D, E
Competitor 1 visited, A, C, E
Competitor 2 visited B, C, X
Count for C1 = 0 and Count for C2 = 1. Competitor 2 is the anti-leader.
Why - Kind of encourages all competitors to get out and grab the new sites that come up since that's most likely what the current leaders don't have.
And it's kind of fun that your score isn't entirely determined by your effort; it'll change when the leaders get out and about again.
But I realize the inherent difficulty in the calculation as the leader may change and the filter needs to be applied to all participants. You could also do it for Europe.
Again, it's just an idea so no agita intended for offering it up.
I'm confused by your use of unvisited in your comment if you're just trying to identify the leaders or commenting on the logic.Without doing the calculations, looking at @PLUS EV 's unvisited map I'm pretty sure it is @Bredo globally and @Bighorn US/Canada. @JSergeant had a shot at US/Canada if he had cleared the northeast before moving to the northwest.
I think he meant that Bighorn has visited the most of my unvisiteds. I haven't looked into it but that definitely seems plausible. It also would not surprise me if it were someone in the northeast like tes-s or TDreamer, because most of my unvisited superchargers are currently in the northeast (as previously stated).I'm confused by your use of unvisited in your comment if you're just trying to identify the leaders or commenting on the logic.
If logic, then you're not comparing the "unvisited" for the leader against everyone else, you're comparing the visited, then looking at the count of what another competitor has visited that the leader hasn't.
And at least according to the badges on the leaderboard, it is Plus for NA and Bredo for Europe.
You could do global, but I'm not sure it makes sense because we don't have many intercontinental competitors.
Bredo | 252 |
StefanSarzio | 173 |
S-19910 | 166 |
Elon Bear | 161 |
simonsmidt | 84 |
busaman | 61 |
tes-s | 47 |
Bighorn | 45 |
Big Earl | 43 |
Thinkje | 40 |
JSergeant | 39 |
Tdreamer | 39 |
theflyer | 35 |
PhillyGal | 22 |
Camelroel | 21 |
Half Dollar Bill | 20 |
benswing | 19 |
YYZ-IAD | 17 |
Only Trons | 15 |
StephenBrown2 | 13 |
smithg13 | 12 |
Monsoon | 11 |
David99 | 10 |
Yes, landscape is changing fast! Here is US/Canada as of now. Everyone with visits to over 30 of @PLUS EV 's unvisited. Not surprisingly, it is the top competitors who have been to the northeast recently.I can see why you rushed the data to press. But seriously, nice response to the query.
Really? That's so kind. My usual descriptors are generally much more unflattering.beloved Half Dollar Bill